St Luke's Anglican Church

Call Directions Website Contact the place of worship

St Luke's Anglican Church Welcome to St. Luke's Anglican Church in Amherst, NH! We would love to have you join us for worship! Please send any inquiries via messenger!

This is the house of God; everyone is welcome to join with us in worship and fellowship. If you are a visitor, we greet you in the Name of the Lord. If you are seeking a church home, we invite you to join our parish family. Our church is part of the Anglican Church in America (a member of the worldwide Traditional Anglican Communion), which stands in the unbroken continuity of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic church of our Lord Jesus Christ. Our faith is based on the eternal Word of God as found holy Scripture and Catholic Tradition as taught by the seven ecumenical councils of the undivided Church of the first millennium A.D.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1728287581989093&set=a.232889321528934
10/27/2026

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1728287581989093&set=a.232889321528934

Have you ever stopped to think about the fact that children apparently really liked Jesus?

Like...actually liked Him.

And I have questions.

Because children, especially little children, are not exactly known for their ability to pretend they enjoy being around someone. If they don't like you, there's a pretty decent chance you're going to find out. They might hide behind their mom, start crying, or just stare at you like you've personally offended them by existing. And if they DO like you, there's a pretty decent chance you're going to find that out too. Usually when they decide you're now their best friend and need to know absolutely everything about the rock they found yesterday. Which they may or may not still have in their pocket. Along with three other rocks, a dead bug, and something sticky that nobody wants to identify.

But children were being brought to Jesus. And in Mark 10:13-16, when the disciples tried to stop people from bringing their children to Him, Jesus was actually indignant. He told them to let the children come to Him, and then He took those children in His arms and blessed them. Which makes me wonder what exactly the disciples thought was going to happen. Did they think Jesus was too busy? That children were somehow beneath His attention? That the Son of God had more important things to do than deal with a toddler who had probably just discovered that dirt was edible?

Now, I realize Scripture doesn't give us a detailed account of Jesus interacting with children. We don't know if He made funny faces, laughed at their antics, or patiently listened while a four-year-old explained something that started with a sheep, somehow involved a rock, and eventually turned into a story about what their brother did yesterday. And then, just when Jesus thought the story was finished, the child probably would have remembered another extremely important detail that required starting the entire explanation over again. But I really do wonder what those interactions looked like. Because Jesus was fully God, but He was also fully human. And being human includes things like smiling, laughing, and enjoying being around people.

I'm not suggesting Jesus was making cross-eyed faces at children behind the Pharisees' backs or teaching Peter how to burp the alphabet. Although now I'm picturing Peter attempting to burp the alphabet, getting approximately four letters into it, and Jesus having to explain why this was not an appropriate addition to the ministry. And then James and John probably arguing over which one of them could do it better. Because if there's one thing the disciples demonstrated repeatedly, it's that being personally selected by Jesus did not automatically eliminate their ability to behave like a bunch of unsupervised boys.

But seriously. Do we sometimes picture Jesus as being so serious that we forget He was someone people actually wanted to be around? He wasn't some distant religious figure who couldn't be bothered with children because He had more important things to do. He was the Son of God, with an entire world to save, and He still made time to hold little kids. And I somehow doubt every single one of those children was freshly bathed, perfectly behaved, and politely waiting for their turn. These were actual children. Some were probably squirming, some were probably talking when someone else was talking, and at least one was probably trying to figure out whether Jesus' sandals were interesting enough to investigate.

And here's something that makes me smile. In Matthew 18:3, Jesus told His disciples that unless they turned and became like children, they would never enter the kingdom of heaven. Not that children needed to become more like the disciples. The disciples needed to become more like children. Which, considering some of the things those disciples managed to say and do, is probably a good thing. These were people who managed to get into arguments about which one of them was the greatest. Meanwhile, Jesus was using a child to explain what greatness in His kingdom actually looked like. I wonder if any of the disciples were standing there thinking that this conversation had taken a rather unfortunate turn.

Obviously, Jesus wasn't telling us to become immature. He was teaching about humility and the kind of dependence and trust that children can demonstrate so naturally. But I wonder how often we complicate our relationship with God because we've convinced ourselves that being serious is somehow the same thing as being holy. As though the closer we get to God, the less we're supposed to smile. Jesus could confront sin, challenge religious leaders, teach profound truths, and still be approachable enough that people wanted Him to hold their babies. Those things aren't contradictory. You can be reverent without looking like someone just informed you that the church potluck ran out of dessert before you got through the line.

And I would love to know what made those children comfortable around Him. Did He kneel down to their level? Did He smile when they came running up? Did He ask them questions? Did He laugh? Did some little kid ever interrupt Him to announce something completely unrelated to the conversation, like the fact that their uncle had a donkey? Scripture doesn't tell us, and I'm not going to pretend it does. But I do know that when the disciples decided the children were an interruption, Jesus disagreed. The children weren't getting in the way of His ministry. They were part of His ministry.

And maybe that's worth remembering when we think about what it means to be Christlike. Because if our version of following Jesus makes us so stern, unapproachable, and concerned about appearances that children are afraid to come near us, I wonder if we've missed something rather important. I'm not suggesting we need to turn every church service into a three-ring circus or that children should be allowed to swing from the light fixtures. Although I suspect some of them would consider that a fantastic improvement to the worship experience. I'm just saying that sometimes we seem more concerned about whether children are acting like little adults than whether we're showing them what the love of Jesus actually looks like.

Jesus was holy. Completely, perfectly holy. And children were welcome in His arms. I don't know exactly how He acted around them, but I sure wish I could have watched Him for five minutes. I would love to see His facial expressions, hear the tone of His voice, and watch how He responded to whatever completely unpredictable things those children said and did. Because children have an incredible ability to ask questions that make absolutely no sense and somehow require a theological explanation at the same time.

Something tells me we might learn a whole lot about Jesus that doesn't quite fit the stern expression we've gotten used to imagining on His face.

And maybe we'd also learn that being Christlike doesn't require us to walk around looking like we've just bitten into a lemon.

After all, the children were welcome.

And Jesus was the one who wanted them there.

10/22/2026

Samuel



SAMUEL WAS A COMBINATION PROPHET, judge, and one-man band. When the old curmudgeon wasn't out in the field trying to fight off the Philistine guerrillas, he was riding his circuit trying to keep the tribes of Israel honest, and when he wasn't doing that, he was giving them hell for cheating on Yahweh every time a new fertility god showed up with a come-hither look in his eye. When he reached retirement age, he might have turned things over to his sons, but they were a bunch of crooks who sold justice to the highest bidder, and the Israelites said maybe he'd better get them a king instead. They'd never had one before, but they felt the time had come. Samuel threw a fit.



He said there was only one king worth the time of day, and Yahweh was his name. He also told them kings were a bad lot from the word go and didn't spare them a single sordid detail. They were always either drafting you into their armies or strong-arming you into taking care of their farms. They took your daughters and put them to work in their kitchens and perfume factories. They filled their barns with your livestock and got you to slave for them till you dropped in your tracks. What was more, if the Israelites chose a king, Yahweh would wash his hands of them and good riddance. Samuel had it on the highest authority. But the Israelites insisted, and since Samuel didn't have the pep he'd once had, he finally gave in.



The king he dug up for them was a tall drink of water named Saul. He was too handsome for his own good, had a rich father, and when it came to religion tended to go off the deep end. Samuel had him in for a meal and, after explaining the job to him, anointed him with holy oil against his better judgment and made him the first king Israel ever had. He regretted this action till the day he died, and even in his grave the memory of it never gave him a moment's peace.



1 Samuel 8-11



-Originally published in Peculiar Treasures and later in Beyond Words

A huge thank you to our beloved organist and parishioner, Jill Slocum for her hard work and dedication to St. Luke’s par...
10/20/2026

A huge thank you to our beloved organist and parishioner, Jill Slocum for her hard work and dedication to St. Luke’s parish. Jill will be moving and leaving us and we are so sad, but so excited for her and this next chapter of life. Thank you again for your incredible musical talent and help with every aspect of parish life. We will miss you!

10/18/2026
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1712710123546839&set=a.232889328195600
10/13/2026

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1712710123546839&set=a.232889328195600

Imagine being a young girl standing along the banks of the Nile River, watching your baby brother float away in a basket. You know why he is there. You know what Pharaoh has commanded. Every Hebrew baby boy is supposed to be thrown into the Nile, and your mother has spent three months hiding this little boy because she refuses to surrender him to that command. But babies have a rather inconvenient habit of making noise, and eventually hiding him has become impossible. So your mother has taken a basket, coated it with bitumen and pitch to make it waterproof, placed her baby inside, and set it among the reeds along the riverbank. And now you are standing at a distance, watching. You cannot know what is going to happen next. You cannot know that the little boy in that basket will someday stand before Pharaoh himself and demand that he release the Israelites from slavery. You cannot know about the plagues, the Passover, the Red Sea, or Mount Sinai. All you know is that your baby brother is in a basket in a river, and somebody needs to make sure he is all right.

And then Pharaoh's daughter comes down to bathe.

Try to imagine what must have gone through Miriam's mind when she saw the daughter of the very man who had ordered her brother's death approaching that basket. This could go terribly wrong. Pharaoh's daughter could have obeyed her father's command. Instead, she opens the basket, sees the crying baby, recognizes that he is one of the Hebrew children, and has compassion on him. And Miriam, who has been watching from a distance, suddenly steps forward with a suggestion that is either remarkably courageous, remarkably clever, or quite possibly both. She asks, "Shall I go and call you a nurse from the Hebrew women to nurse the child for you?" (Exodus 2:7). Pharaoh's daughter agrees, and Miriam goes directly to their mother. Think about that for a moment. The mother who had placed her baby in the river because she could no longer safely hide him is now being summoned to nurse her own son, under the protection of Pharaoh's daughter, and she will even be paid for doing it. God has taken the command intended to destroy this child and, through a young girl's quick thinking and a princess's compassion, arranged for him to be cared for by his own mother.

We are not told exactly how old Miriam was at the time, and Exodus does not even give us her name in this scene. She is simply the child's sister. But what an extraordinary introduction to a woman who will eventually become one of the most recognizable female figures in Israel's history. She is observant, courageous, willing to act, and apparently quite capable of thinking on her feet when the situation demands it. And perhaps one of the most remarkable things about this moment is that Miriam has absolutely no idea how significant her actions will become. She is not standing beside the Nile thinking about her place in biblical history. She is watching her brother. She is doing what needs to be done in the moment directly in front of her. And God is working through those ordinary, courageous actions in ways she cannot possibly understand.

Now move forward approximately eighty years.

That little boy from the basket has grown up, fled Egypt, spent decades in Midian, encountered God at the burning bush, and returned to confront Pharaoh. The plagues have devastated Egypt. The Israelites have finally been released from slavery, only to find themselves trapped between the Red Sea and the Egyptian army pursuing them. And then God does something that no human being could have accomplished. He parts the waters. Israel walks through on dry ground, and when the Egyptian army follows, the waters return. The army that had pursued them is destroyed, and the people who had spent generations enslaved in Egypt are standing on the opposite shore, alive and free.

And there is Miriam.

Exodus 15 identifies her as a prophetess, the sister of Aaron. She takes a tambourine in her hand, and the women follow her with tambourines and dancing. Then she leads them in praise: "Sing to the LORD, for he has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider he has thrown into the sea" (Exodus 15:21).

Can you picture that scene? The sound of tambourines. The women dancing. The celebration of people who have just witnessed something beyond anything they could have imagined. These are women who had lived under slavery, who had raised children under Pharaoh's oppression, who had known fear, suffering, and uncertainty. And now they are standing on the shore of the Red Sea, praising the God who has delivered them. Miriam is not simply standing somewhere in the crowd. She is leading them. The young girl who once stood beside the Nile watching over her brother is now a woman standing beside another body of water, leading the daughters of Israel in worship.

There is something beautiful about those two scenes. At the Nile, Miriam watched as her brother was placed into the water, uncertain whether he would survive. At the Red Sea, she watched as God brought an entire nation safely through the water. The little girl who had once helped preserve the life of one child is now celebrating the deliverance God accomplished through that same child decades later. And in both scenes, the focus ultimately belongs to God. Miriam did not save Moses by her own power, and Moses did not part the Red Sea by his own power. God was the One working through them. God was the One preserving His people. God was the One accomplishing what no human being could do.

But Miriam's story does not end with tambourines and dancing.

And this is where her story becomes considerably more uncomfortable, because Scripture does not give us carefully polished biographies of people who never made mistakes. It gives us real people. People who trusted God and sometimes struggled to trust Him. People who demonstrated extraordinary courage and later made terrible decisions. People who could lead others in worship and still allow pride, jealousy, or resentment to grow in their own hearts. And Miriam, for all the remarkable things we have already seen, was no exception.

In Numbers 12, Miriam and Aaron speak against Moses because of the Cush*te woman he had married. And there is something important about how this account begins, because we need to be careful not to soften Miriam's responsibility simply because we admire the woman she had been. In the original Hebrew, although both Miriam and Aaron are named, the verb translated "spoke" is feminine singular. That is an unusual grammatical detail, and many scholars understand it as suggesting that Miriam may have been the one who initiated the complaint. We cannot say with absolute certainty that she started it, but the wording certainly places her in the foreground. Miriam was not simply an innocent bystander who happened to be standing next to Aaron while he complained about their brother. She was actively involved, and Scripture makes no attempt to excuse her.

The complaint begins with Moses' Cush*te wife, but it quickly becomes apparent that there is something else going on. Miriam and Aaron ask, "Has the LORD indeed spoken only through Moses? Has he not spoken through us also?" (Numbers 12:2). And there it is. Miriam was a prophetess. Aaron was the high priest. Both had been given important responsibilities among God's people. In fact, centuries later, God Himself would remind Israel that He had sent Moses, Aaron, and Miriam before them (Micah 6:4). They were not imagining that God had worked through them. He really had. They were not wrong to recognize that they had been given significant roles. The problem was that they were now using those legitimate roles as justification for questioning the distinct authority God had given Moses.

And I wonder how often we do something similar. Not necessarily by openly challenging somebody, but by looking at what God has given another person and quietly beginning to question why He has not given us the same thing. We can be perfectly content with our responsibilities until we start comparing them with somebody else's. Suddenly the things we once considered privileges begin to feel insufficient. We start measuring importance by visibility, influence, recognition, or authority, as though God's ability to use one person somehow diminishes His ability to use another. Miriam had been there at the Nile. She had been there at the Red Sea. She had been recognized as a prophetess and entrusted with leadership among God's people. But somewhere along the way, she began questioning why Moses held a position she did not.

And God heard her.

That is one of those little statements in Scripture that deserves more attention than we sometimes give it. Miriam and Aaron were speaking about Moses, but God was listening. And God was not particularly pleased with what He heard.

He summons Moses, Aaron, and Miriam to the tent of meeting. Imagine standing there as the pillar of cloud descends and the Lord calls Aaron and Miriam forward. God explains that while He may communicate with prophets through visions and dreams, His relationship with Moses is different. Moses has been entrusted with a unique responsibility, and God speaks with him in a uniquely direct way. Then God asks, "Why then were you not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?" (Numbers 12:8).

That question should stop us for a moment. Because Miriam and Aaron were not merely expressing an opinion about their brother. They were challenging an appointment God Himself had made. Moses had not simply decided that he would like to be in charge of several hundred thousand people wandering through the wilderness. In fact, if you remember the burning bush, Moses had spent a considerable amount of time explaining to God why he was probably not the best person for the job. God had called him anyway. And now Miriam and Aaron were questioning why God had given him an authority that He had not given them.

Then the cloud departs.

Aaron turns toward Miriam and sees that she has been struck with a severe skin condition described in the text as leprous, white as snow. Interestingly, Aaron is not struck in the same way, even though he participated in the complaint. Scripture does not explain every reason for that distinction, and we should not pretend that it does. But Miriam's prominent role in the complaint, followed by the judgment that falls upon her, makes it impossible to dismiss her responsibility. God had given her a remarkable calling, but that calling did not place her above correction. Her courage at the Nile did not excuse her behavior in the wilderness. Her leadership at the Red Sea did not give her permission to challenge whatever God had established.

And then something remarkable happens.

Aaron immediately acknowledges their sin and appeals to Moses. And Moses, the very brother they had been speaking against, cries out to God on Miriam's behalf: "O God, please heal her—please" (Numbers 12:13).

There is something particularly moving about that moment. Moses does not use the opportunity to remind Miriam that she should have respected him. He does not celebrate the fact that God has publicly defended his authority. He does not stand there demanding an apology before he will intervene. He prays for his sister. The same sister who had once stood beside the Nile watching over him is now the one in need of help, and Moses immediately asks God to heal her.

But God's response also makes something clear. Forgiveness and restoration do not necessarily mean that consequences disappear. Miriam is required to remain outside the camp for seven days. God uses the comparison of a father publicly expressing displeasure toward his daughter to explain the period of shame she must bear. Miriam had challenged the authority God established, and now she would experience a public period of disgrace and separation before being allowed to return.

And then Numbers tells us something easy to overlook.

The people did not move on until Miriam was brought back.

An entire nation waited. The woman who had once led Israel's women in celebration was now outside the camp, separated from the people, while they waited for her restoration. We are not told what Miriam thought during those seven days. We are not told whether she and Moses had a conversation afterward, or what she said when she finally returned. Scripture does not give us those details, and we do not need to invent them. What we do know is that she was brought back, and Israel continued its journey.

And I think that matters just as much as the judgment itself.

Because Miriam's failure in Numbers 12 did not erase what God had done through her in Exodus 2 or Exodus 15. Her courage at the Nile was real. Her leadership at the Red Sea was real. Her calling as a prophetess was real. And her sin was real, too. Scripture allows all of those things to be true at the same time. It does not pretend that a person who has been used by God is incapable of falling into pride, and it does not pretend that one terrible failure means every faithful thing that came before it was meaningless. Miriam was held accountable for what she had done, but she was also restored to the community.

And perhaps that is something we need to remember when looking at the lives of people in Scripture, and when looking at people around us. We have a tendency to want our biblical characters to fit neatly into categories. The faithful ones. The foolish ones. The courageous ones. The ones who made terrible decisions. Except human beings have a rather inconvenient habit of being more complicated than that. Miriam could be courageous and prideful. She could be a prophetess and still be wrong. She could lead people in worship and later need to be corrected by the very God she worshiped. And God did not need to pretend her sin was insignificant in order to show her mercy.

Eventually, in Numbers 20, we are told that Miriam died at Kadesh and was buried there. There is no elaborate description of her final moments. No record of one last speech. Just the simple statement that Miriam died. And yet, centuries later, when God reminded Israel of His faithfulness in bringing them out of Egypt, He included Miriam alongside Moses and Aaron. Her failure had not erased her place in the story of what God had done.

I keep coming back to that little girl standing beside the Nile. She had no title. No position of authority. No audience. No understanding of what her brother would someday become. She simply saw what needed to be done and stepped forward. And God used her. Decades later, she stood beside the Red Sea with a tambourine in her hand, leading women in praise because she had witnessed the extraordinary power of the God who had delivered them. And God used her there, too.

But when she began questioning why her brother had been given something different, she lost sight of something she had once understood so clearly.

The story was never about which of them was the most important. It was about the God who had called them.

And that is perhaps the greatest lesson Miriam leaves us. God does not need everyone to have the same responsibilities. He does not need everyone to stand in front of the crowd, hold the staff, speak to Pharaoh, or lead an entire nation. He calls different people to different purposes, and the significance of those purposes is not determined by how impressive they appear to everyone else. The girl watching a basket in the reeds was being faithful. The woman leading worship beside the sea was being faithful. And the woman challenging her brother in the wilderness needed to remember that faithfulness also means accepting the authority and responsibilities God has established, even when they are not the ones we would have chosen for ourselves.

Miriam did not need to become Moses to matter. God had already given her a place in His plan. A remarkable place. A place that included preserving her brother's life, witnessing the deliverance of Israel, and leading God's people in praise. But she needed to remember that being called by God did not mean she could dictate how God should call someone else.

And perhaps the most striking thing about her story is that the same God who worked through her courage also confronted her pride. He did not overlook her sin because of her past faithfulness, and He did not erase her past faithfulness because of her sin. He held her accountable, allowed her to be restored, and continued carrying out His purposes.

The little girl at the Nile did not need to know the future to be faithful in the present. The woman at the Red Sea did not need to be the one who parted the waters to rejoice in what God had done.

And the woman who challenged Moses needed to remember what both of those earlier moments had already demonstrated.

She had never needed to be the one holding the staff.

She simply needed to trust the One who parted the sea.

Address

3 Limbo Lane
Amherst, NH
03031

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when St Luke's Anglican Church posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to St Luke's Anglican Church:

Shortcuts

Share

Nearby places of worship