04/15/2025
2025 APRIL 15: HEATHER COX RICHARDSON
Today, U.S. president Donald J. Trump met in the Oval Office with the president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, along with a number of Cabinet members and White House staff, who answered questions for the press. The meeting appeared to be as staged as Trumpâs February meeting with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky, designed to send a message. At the meeting, Trump and Bukele, who is clearly doing Trumpâs bidding, announced they would not bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia home, defying the U.S. Supreme Court.
Bukele was livestreaming the event on his official X account and wearing a lapel microphone as he and Trump walked into the Oval Office, so Trumpâs pre-meeting private comments were audible in the video Bukele posted. âWe want to do homegrown criminals nextâŚ. The homegrowns.â Trump told Bukele. âYou gotta build about five more places.â Bukele appeared to answer, âYeah, weâve got space.â âAll right,â Trump replied.
Rather than being appalled, the people in the roomâincluding Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Attorney General Pam Bondiâerupted in laughter.
At the meeting, it was clear that Trumpâs team has cooked up a plan to leave Abrego Garcia without legal recourse to his freedom, a plan that looks much like Trumpâs past abuses of the legal system. The White House says the U.S. has no jurisdiction over El Salvador, while Bukele says he has no authority to release a âterroristâ into the U.S. (Abrego Garcia maintains a full-time job, is married to a U.S. citizen, has three children, and has never been charged or convicted of anything.) No one can make Trump arrange for Abrego Garciaâs release, the administration says, because the Constitution gives the president control over foreign affairs.
Marcy Wheeler of Empty Wheel noted that âall the people who should be submitting sworn declarations before [U.S. District Court] Judge Paula Xinis made comments not burdened by oaths or the risk of contempt, rehearsed comments for the cameras.â They falsely claimed that a court had ruled Abrego Garcia was a terrorist, and insisted the whole case was about the presidentâs power to control foreign affairs.
As NPRâs Steven Inskeep put it: âIf I understand this correctly, the US president has launched a trade war against the world, believes he can force the EU and China to meet his terms, is determined to annex Canada and Greenland, but is powerless before the sovereign might of El Salvador. Is that it?â
On April 6, Judge Xinis wrote that âthere were no legal grounds whatsoever for [Abrego Garciaâs] arrest, detention, or removal.⌠Rather, his detention appears wholly lawless.â It is âa clear constitutional violation.â The Supreme Court agreed with Xinis that Abrego Garcia had been illegally removed from the U.S. and must be returned, but warned the judge to be careful of the presidentâs power over foreign affairs.
At the Oval Office meeting, when Trump asked what the Supreme Court ruled, deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller said it had ruled â9â0âŚin our favor,â claiming âthe Supreme Court said that the district court order was unlawful and its main components were reversed 9â0 unanimously.â Legal analyst Chris Geidner of Law Dork called Millerâs statement âdisgusting, lying propaganda.â
He also noted that when the administration filed its required declaration about Abrego Garciaâs case today, it included a link to the Oval Office meeting, thus submitting Millerâs lies about its decision directly to the Supreme Court. Geidner wished the administration's lawyers: âGood luck thereâŚ!â
Legal analyst Harry Litman of Talking Feds wrote: âWhat we all just witnessed had all the earmarks of a criminal conspiracy to deprive Abrego-Garcia of his constitutional rights, as well as an impeachable offense. The fraud scheme was a phony agreement engineered by the US to have Bukele say he lacks power to return Abrego Garcia and he won't do it.â
As Adam Serwer wrote today in The Atlantic, The ârhetorical game the administration is playing, where it pretends it lacks the power to ask for Abrego Garcia to be returned while Bukele pretends he doesnât have the power to return him, is an expression of obvious contempt for the Supreme Courtâand for the rule of law.â
Serwer notes that if the administration actually thought there was enough evidence to convict these men, it could have let the U.S. legal process play out. But Geidner of Law Dork noted that Trumpâs declaration this morning that he wanted to deport âhomegrown criminalsâ suggests that the plan all along has been to be able to get rid of U.S. citizens by creating a âSchroedingerâs boxâ where anyone can be sent but where once they are there the U.S. cannot get them back because they are âin the custody of a foreign sovereign.â
âIf they can get Abrego Garcia out of the box,â Geidner writes, âthe plan does not work.â
On August 12, 2024, in a discussion on billionaire Elon Muskâs X of what Trump insisted were caravans coming across the southern border of the U.S., Trump told Musk that other countries were doing something âbrilliantâ by sending streams of people out of their country. âYou know the caravans are coming in andâŚwhoâs doing this are the heads of the countries. And you would be doing it and so would I, and everyone would say âoh what a terrible thing to say.ââ
He continued: âThe fact is, itâs brilliant for them because they're taking all of their bad people, really bad people andâI hate to say thisâthe reason the numbers are much bigger than you would think is theyâre also taking their nonproductive people. Now these arenât people that will kill youâŚbut these are people that are nonproductive. They are just not productive, I mean, for whatever reason. Theyâre not workers or they donât want to work, or whatever, and these countries are getting rid of nonproductive people in the caravansâŚand theyâre also getting rid of their murderers and their drug dealers and the people that are really brutal peopleâŚ.â
Scholar of authoritarianism Timothy Snyder explained the larger picture: âOn the White Houseâs theory, if they abduct you, get you on a helicopter, get to international waters, shoot you in the head, and drop your co**se into the ocean, that is legal, because it is the conduct of foreign affairs.â He compared it to the Nazisâ practice of pushing Jews into statelessness because â[i]t is easier to move people away from law than it is to move law away from people. Almost all of the killing took place in artificially created stateless zones.â
Yesterday, Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) requested a meeting with Bukele today âto discuss the illegal detention of my constituent, Kilmar Abrego Garcia.â He said that he would travel to El Salvador this week if Abrego Garcia âis not home by midweek.â
Judge Xinis has set the next hearing in Abrego Garciaâs case for tomorrow, April 15, at 4:00 p.m.
Today, Dauphin County Magisterial District Judge Dale Klein denied bail for Cody Balmer, the 38-year-old man charged in connection with the arson attack on the home of Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro on April 13, saying he is a danger to the community. Balmer allegedly set alight beer bottles full of gasoline in the same room in the governor's mansion where, just hours before, the family had held a Passover meal. Shapiro and his wife Lori, their four children, and another family were asleep in the house. Emergency personnel rescued the people and pets, but the historic mansion sustained significant damage.
Balmer said he has a high-school education. He is currently unemployed, does not have any income or savings, and has been living with his parents. Balmer was charged with assault in 2023, allegedly punching both his wife (from whom he is now separated) and their 13-year-old son in the face during an argument. He was due in court this week. His mother says he has mental health issues.
Balmer said he âharbor[ed] hatredâ for Governor Shapiro and would have beaten him with a hammer if he had found him.
Governor Shapiro called it âan attack not just on our family, but on the entire Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaâŚ. This type of violence is not okay. This kind of violence is becoming far too common in our society. And I donât give a damn if itâs coming from one particular side or the other, directed at one particular party or another, or one particular person or another. It is not okay and it has to stop. We have to be better than this. We have a responsibility to all be better.â
â
