08/12/2026
This is from my friend Shawn Browning--driver par excellent. Regarding what the now-blocked man posted on *my* wall--this is gold, Jerry--gold:
"There is a significant problem with this statement “Messiah always pointed back to Moses and Torah.”
Jesus certainly quoted and affirmed the Torah, but Jesus also explicitly claimed authority greater than Moses and presented Himself as the fulfillment toward which the Law pointed. For example:
Luke 24:44 HCSB
“These are My words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about Me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms must be fulfilled.”
Notice the direction. Jesus isn’t simply pointing people back to Moses. He says Moses points to Him. Even stronger:
John 5:46 HCSB
“For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me.”
Again, the direction of the argument is important:
Moses → Jesus
not
Jesus → Moses as the ultimate authority.
And Jesus establishes a New Covenant:
Luke 22:20 HCSB
“This cup is the new covenant established by My blood; it is shed for you.”
That happens before Paul writes a single epistle.
So the New Covenant is not something Paul invented in order to free Christians from Moses. Jesus Himself explicitly announces the New Covenant.
There’s another problem with the idea that Jesus “never pointed to a Paul or a future teacher.” According to Acts, Jesus Himself chose Paul.
Acts 9:15 HCSB
“Go! For this man is My chosen instrument to take My name to Gentiles, kings, and the Israelites.”
So if one accepts Acts as Scripture, the statement becomes particularly difficult to sustain. Jesus didn’t need to predict during His earthly ministry, “Someday listen to Paul.” The risen Jesus subsequently commissioned Paul Himself.
And this doesn’t require believing that the Church has “replaced Israel.” That’s actually a separate theological question. You can reject replacement theology completely while simultaneously affirming Paul’s apostleship and the New Covenant.
In fact, Paul himself strongly rejects the idea that God simply discarded Israel:
Romans 11:1 HCSB
“I ask, then, has God rejected His people? Absolutely not!”
So there are really two different arguments being blended together in your comment: the continuing role of Israel and the continuing authority of the Mosaic covenant. Those aren’t the same question."
Killer stuff, brother, Thank you