08/08/2024
Just thinkin’ about liberalism since a new word found itself into my thoughts and vocabulary: meliorism. I have Risa Keene to sincerely thank for that and am sharing her post. The following involves a long, thoughtful, meditative process, so grab your coffee, sit back, and ponder.
Meliorism is the philosophical belief that the world can be made better through human effort. This idea holds that progress is possible and that human actions can lead to improvements in society. It is a key underpinning of both liberalism and democracy, as these ideologies emphasize the capacity for social, economic, and political reforms to enhance human welfare. Understand the words “…to enhance human welfare.” This phrase refers to EVERYONE; not just a few of us. There can be no valid argument against this and to do so is a decidedly anti-democratic and yes, anti-humanistic stance – an indication of obvious prejudicial attitudes no matter how its phrased or by whom. We see it everywhere throughout our society. How can we accept this in today’s world? Meliorism aligns with the liberal view that humans are capable of self-improvement and rational decision-making, and fosters faith in democratic processes, education, and the rule of law as means to achieve societal progress. Is there anything better that this? This is “woke-ness” in practice and, yet, seems to generate fear in others to the point of denigration, scorn and vilification. When we see this, do we fully understand that this helps tear down democratic structures from its foundations up, throughout our society, and to the very bowels of our democratic government? Liberalism is inherently melioristic in its belief that through reason, debate, and reforms, societies can advance toward greater justice and equality. Liberals advocate for policies that expand individual rights, promote social welfare, and encourage economic opportunities. Does this sound destructive to democracy or supportive? Do these strengthen our democratic ideals or destroy them? We all must be the judge and choose the side best suited to our personal philosophy. Take note: liberals often push for policies aimed at reducing inequality and protecting the rights of marginalized groups, reflecting a melioristic belief that society can and should improve for all its members. Should we disagree with this? Of course not if our heart’s are in the “right” place, so-to-speak. Democracy embodies meliorism as liberalism by entrusting citizens with the power to influence governance through voting and civic engagement. This reflects a belief in the capacity of people to make informed choices that lead to societal betterment. Democratic systems are designed to adapt and evolve, enabling continuous improvement through reforms and responsive governance. This adaptability is central to the melioristic (liberal) vision of progress and encourages diverse voices and ideas by fostering innovation and solutions that can address complex social issues, thus embodying the belief in human capacity for improvement. Denigration of this is THE sign of opposition. The antithesis of liberalism as democratic governance is dictatorship or authoritarian governance, which can and has let to totalitarianism and fascism with all degrees in between. But let’s try to be fair and take a look at common arguments and distractions posited against liberalism. 1) Antiliberal factions often accuse liberals of being elitist and out of touch with the average American. They argue that liberal policies prioritize urban, coastal elites over rural and working-class citizens. Is this the way you see it? 2) Some critics claim it promotes moral relativism, suggesting that it undermines traditional values and social norms by advocating for issues such as LGBTQ+ rights, secularism, and multiculturalism. Is this the way you see it?
In reply to these criticisms, note that our Society is evolving. It is opening itself up to review and societal course-corrections - its faults are seen more clearly than ever. When this happens, any democratic society MUST make changes and this means changing the way we look at our “traditional values”. Should these remain ever carved in stone? NO. Change must occur or we stagnate and cannot grow into or meet our democratic ideals but worse is the fact that injustices will never be overcome. Is this want we want? For everything to stay the same? As for “being out of touch “with the average American,” doesn’t that fall into the same category? Who are we to say what the “average” citizen believes or not. Let the democratic process speak for ALL Americans and the outcome will be the viewpoint of the “average American” (you and me).
Let’s face it, antiliberals often portray liberalism as synonymous with big government and excessive regulation, arguing that such policies stifle individual freedom and economic growth.
There is some truth in this, I admit. If societal corrections cannot not be made at the local and state levels, the federal government must step in as a reflection of the democratic process boosted, necessarily, to that level. To right the wrongs of the past and those that currently exist in support of our so-called “traditional values” takes money. We all share in righting those wrongs and we all have the power to make changes to governance through our votes if we feel changes are not being made or have gone too far. WE are the judges of our own destiny – never forget.
There is a critique that liberalism excessively focuses on identity politics, leading to division and a perceived prioritization of minority groups over a unified national identity. Of course this is true…and absolutely necessary if we truly want to overcome the injustices of the past and evolve our humanism on into a much fairer and more democratic America. Let us, therefore, be as liberal as possible, let us embrace meliorism as the true thread running through our democratic ideal as Americans. Let us be proud of being liberal, proud of being “woke”, and proud that we all have a say in our democratic governance. Vote your belief in ourselves as caring individuals with an eye to a better future. Because of resistances to change, it won’t happen as quickly as we want, but it will happen if we continue to live as one humanity, and in peace and with justice for all.