07/25/2025
🔵FORMER CATHOLIC PRIEST ALBERTO RIVERA in the 1960's predicted that 'glossa lalia' (speaking in tongues) would be the bridge that would bring the 'wayward, pagan' Protestants back to their 'Mother Church,' the Catholic Church. 🟣ALTHOUGH CATHOLICS WERE NOT involved in the Azusa Street Revivals (1906-1909) in Los Angeles, the Spiritualist Churches were. The Spiritualist Church, founded in 1848 by the Fox Sisters, had already planted dozens of 'churches' around Los Angeles. It did not take long for some of the congregants to hear about the 'tongues meetings' going on in an abandoned Methodist church building. They infiltrated the meetings and took over Pastor Seymour's oversight, coaching honest seekers to speak in unknown babblings. 🔵At Notre Dame on Friday, May 28, 1976, approximately 25,000 devotees of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal Movement gathered to hear Archbishop Joseph L. Bernadin of Cincinnati read his approving document while in a heavy downpour. 🟣William J. Seymour, who traveled from Texas to California to eventually pastor the Azusa Street Mission, was hoping to experience what his mentor, Charles F. Parham, had prayed for that the Lord God would restore the gifts of the Spirit, especially the gift of tongues. April 1906, at the Azusa Street Church would be the place where 'speaking in tongues' was experienced as thousands came from around the world to see the 'Pentecostal Revival.' 🔵This renewal invaded almost every branch of Protestantism: Some Methodists, Baptists, Episcopalians, Presbyterians etc., however, by1973 over 50 different Protestant denominations were invaded by this charismatic movement with more than 2,500 clergymen enjoined. 🟣BESIDES THE SPIRITUALISTS' CHURCH building upon the experience of tongues, the MORMON Church, led by their founder, Joseph Smith (1805-1844), introduced tongues into his church about 1833, and eleven years later he reaffirmed it in a declaration of Mormon doctrine. They never claimed a real language but maintained that God would shape the ecstatic utterance into a language. Meetings were advertised as a time of tongues speaking. After the meeting was well started, Smith would call upon an illiterate individual and ask him to stand to his feet and make sounds of some kind and the Lord would make a tongue out of it. 'GLOSSA LALIA' or speaking in unknown tongues had strange bedfellows to begin with. 🔵WESLEYAN-HOLINESS churches like the Wesleyan Methodist and Pilgrim Holiness Church, were born out of the fire while preaching the baptism in the Holy Ghost which came simultaneously with entire sanctification (without the tongues). Acts 15:8, 9 confirms that on the Day of Pentecost the 120 disciples in the Upper Room, who were 'filled with the Holy Ghost,' were definitely experiencing their 'Second Blessing' that Wesley spoke of sometimes. Of course, praying clear through to being sanctified wholly when the Fire fell, all took place in the regenerated disciples in Acts 2:4a, without the tongues. When the Holy Ghost Fire fell upon the disciples purifying their hearts by faith, it was their inner witness that He had come to His temple🟣MOST CATHOLICS AND PENTEOCOSTALS miss the 'comma' in Acts 2:4, 'And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost - COMMA - and began speaking in other languages as the Spirit gave them utterance.' That 'comma' was inserted by the King James translators BECAUSE in the original Greek, 'And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost' was written in the AORIST TENSE, signifying that something took place and was completed in the past. But not only that, but that the AORIST tense always expresses an action simply as past, neither having any connection with time present, nor any reference to another action (like the disciples speaking in tongues), nor any notion of continuance. This means that the baptism in the Holy Ghost was a past action having nothing to do with their speaking in other languages later that morning. WE DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY CATHOLICS & PENTECOSTALS overlook this Greek grammar syntax of Acts 2:4. 🔵BUT THERE'S MORE - The second part of Acts 2:4b, '.....and began to speak with other languages as the Spirit gave to them to utter forth,' (literal translation) is in the IMPERFECT TENSE signifying that the disciples' speaking in foreign languages was something they did and continued to do over and over again. 🟣 'WHERE THE AORIST & IMPERFECT TENSES OCCUR SIDE BY SIDE, AS THEY DO IN ACTS 2:4, 10:46 & 19:6, it is to be assumed that the change from one tense to another is made on purpose and the difference in idea is to be sought.' This grammatical truth PROVES beyond a shadow of a doubt, that their infilling of the Spirit was completed earlier that Pentecost morning, and that when they began to speak one at a time in the mother tongue of the fifteen Jewish nations around 9 a.m., these two actions of the Holy Spirit had absolutely nothing to do with each other. Which means, that the popular doctrine that tongues is the initial evidence of being filled with the Spirit, IS A FALSE DOCTRINE. 🔵THE IMPERFECT TENSE proves that also, that the disciples did not just speak in tongues once, at their infilling, but that Holy Ghost infilling was already completed and a past action of the Spirit, then sometime later they continued to speak with foreign languages, one at a time, as God gave them the gift of speaking in other languages they had not learned before until all in Jerusalem had heard the wonderful works of God 'in their own language.' 🟣TODAY THERE ARE 15 MILLION CATHOLICS who have experienced 'glossa lalia.' Catholics may be devout in their Church and its beliefs, but they trust in their works and their Church to be saved. Therefore, their experience of speaking in tongues to prove they have the Holy Ghost, proves nothing at all except that they have spoken gibberish. 🔵ALBERTO RIVERA WAS GIVEN a prophecy that 'glossa lalia' would bridge the Catholics and the Protestants. How can this happen? The Protestants and even all the Christian churches in Pentecostalism must look at the Charismatic Catholics and accept them because they MUST have the Holy Ghost, because they speak in tongues. 🟣THE FINAL BATTLE BETWEEN who has the Holy Spirit and who doesn't, will come down to EXPERIENCE and PHENOMENON compared to the Word of God and faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ on the cross. THEREFORE, what are the FALSE DOCTINES & DOGMAS & man-made LIES of the Roman Catholic Church? 🔘Here is a short list of their falsities; The Pope is not only infallible, but also the Holy Father, the Vicar, God and Christ on the Earth; His Holiness, the Most Holy Father, The Holy Father, the Sovereign Pontiff including that the Popery was founded first by the apostle Peter by Jesus in Matthew 16:18. Additional lies concern Mary who they say is the 'Spouse of the Spirit,' 'the Mother of God,' was Immaculately conceived; Kept form original sin and personal sin; Queen of heaven; Channel of Grace; Advocate; Mediatrix, Coredemptrix; bodily assumed into glory because she never physically died etc. MORE THAN 20 LIES and beliefs that are not founded upon God's Word. ◼️Why would their leaders do such a thing? For one reason, they do not believe the Holy Bible to be the only inspired book and can glean anything they so desire from their own libraries. The Holy Scriptures are not their final authority but what they desire their millions of followers to believe. 🔵FORMER CATHOLIC PRIEST ALBERTO RIVERA, a controversial Jesuit believed and wrote about how the Catholic Church and Protestants would be brought together through the means of 'glossa lalia' or speaking in tongues. This took place in the 1960s and continues today especially through the Trinitarian Pentecostals. 🔘Most of today's Apostolic Pentecostals came out of the Azusa Street meetings as they denied the Trinity and claimed that 'tongues' was the initial evidence of being filled with the Spirit. THE FALSE DOCTRINES of the modern Charismatic and Pentecostal groups include 'tongues' is THE evidence or sign of being filled with the Holy Ghost; and/or that 'tongues' is optional but needs to be sought to have the anointing in the ministry and in one's personal life; "Praying in tongues' is 'praying in the Spirit' or 'praying in the Holy Ghost,' using Jude 20 & First Cor. 14 which is removing it from each context; 'the Holy Ghost' & 'Tongues' are synonymous; 🔘In Acts 2:38 they believe though Peter didn't say it, he meant that the 'gift of the Holy Ghost' was automatically speaking in tongues; In Isaiah 28:11, 12 these groups misinterpret and/or wrest the meaning and context of the chapter, i. e., that tongues speaking is 'rest and refreshing' to the user; In Acts 2:4b modern groups believe the disciples spoke in 'unknown babblings' in the Upper Room which they believe was the 'noise' heard all over Jerusalem that drew thousands of Jews to the Temple; ALL OF THESE BELIEFS are FALSE. 🔳But there's more. In Mark 16:17, 18 Jesus' supposed words are used to make their belief that 'new tongues' is what all believers will speak in when they believe; SOME PENTECOSTALS believe that Pentecost and the disciples' Upper Room experience of speaking in unknown tongues, was when the disciples were 'Born Again' or Saved; 🔘Many groups believe that all their backsliders need to do is to come back to the altar and speak in some sort of tongues, and through that action, they are back into the fold, using Acts 3:19; Most groups, including both Trinitarian and Apostolic, believe Romans 8:26, 27 are speaking about how the Holy Ghost prays for us in unknown babblings as a prayer language, and in a most powerful way plows through all of Satan's strongholds right into the presence of the Lord. This is nothing more than committing eisegesis. Also, both groups believe in 'progressive sanctification' which is not found in the Scriptures. 🟣TO TOP THIS ALL OFF, the Apostolics believe one must be baptized in 'Jesus Name' only, according to Acts 2:38, and all others who were baptized in the Trinity, are not Saved. That means, even though the Trinitarian Pentecostals speak in unknown babblings as their sign of being Spirit-filled, that, according to the Apostolics, they still are not Saved because of being baptized in the 'wrong formula' and must be baptized again in the correct formular, if they want to go to Heaven, etc. 🔵THEREFORE, these 15+ man-made doctrines that are taken out of the Biblical context or wrested are FALSE DOCTRINES and not the faith once delivered unto the saints. Many of these misnomers are taken from Paul's epistles and changing the original meanings of Paul's words to fit into their own doctrine. LET US PRAY ONE FOR ANOTHER lest we be caught up in erroneous doctrines that will make our soul be eternally lost. ✝️