02/02/2026
Compassion, Justice, and the Danger of Untethered Faith - by Pr. Rennie Kaufmann
Trying to make sense of the arguments for and against ICE, Border Patrol, Immigration Law Enforcement, and more...? This is for you. Think about this -- "Who gets to define compassion, justice, and love -- and by what authority?"
In recent weeks, I’ve watched friends quote Scripture, hymns, post prayers, and images shared with great emotional force -- all in the name of "justice," "compassion," "peacemaking" (from the Gospel reading of the Beatitudes), and being Christ-like. Much of it sounds beautiful. Much of it feels urgent, and much of it, I believe, is sincere. But sincerity is not the same as faithfulness.
What concerns me is not compassion itself. Hey, Christians are commanded to love their neighbor. Right? What concerns me is compassion untethered from truth, empathy severed from repentance, and biblical language repurposed to support conclusions Scripture itself does not teach.
We all see Scriptures misapplied and cherry-picked... and reduced to slogans... (I pulled these from friends' pages and posted videos and memes) such as... “Blessed are the peacemakers”... “He does not heap contempt upon his neighbor”... “Do justice, love mercy, walk humbly”... “When cruelty becomes normal, compassion looks radical”... “Power without compassion walks a crooked trail”...
All of these sound compassionate and even biblical, because some of them are biblical -- at least in part. But when verses are lifted out of their context and flattened into slogans, they stop proclaiming God’s Word and start serving an ideology rather than Biblical truth and faith.
As I preached yesterday, the Beatitudes, for example, are not instructions for how to earn God’s favor. Jesus is not saying, “If you want to be blessed, be a peacemaker.” He is describing what life looks like when God’s reign breaks into a sinful world -- when mercy, meekness, and peace appear because Christ is present.
But so many turn the Beatitudes into moral marching orders. When that's done, unfortunately, it quietly replaces Gospel with Law -- and usually with a Law that no one can clearly define or consistently apply.
A recent message in posts and reels circulating online insists, “Jesus is not neutral. He doesn’t begin with who is right, but with who is hurting. He is loyal to suffering.” There is a crucial truth hidden here -- and a serious error wrapped around it. You see, yes, Jesus is not neutral -->> but He Is also not undefined!
In a video, an Episcopal priest reduces Jesus' baptism by John into a mere being present and standing with suffering humanity. Yes, Jesus stands in the waters of the Jordan with the suffering... but the crucial distinction is missed -- He stands among sinners. And He does not do so merely to demonstrate solidarity with pain and suffering. He shows God's complete, holy intolerance of sin and perfect love for sinners. He enters those waters because they are filled with those who are repentant and confess sin... And it is for those sins that He has come to carry them to the cross and die.
“Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world.” When Scripture shows Jesus among sinners, it is never an end in itself. It is always a step toward the cross.
To say that Jesus prioritizes suffering over truth subtly detaches pain from sin, as though hurt itself were the primary problem. But Scripture teaches otherwise. Suffering exists because sin exists, and Christ does not merely accompany us in our pain -- He calls for repentance as He desires to redeem us from its cause and save us from sin's curse and penalty.
Jesus is not loyal to suffering as such. He is loyal to sinners by fulfilling God’s Law on their behalf. He does not suspend truth to be present -- He brings truth so that mercy can be real.
I read and hear about "compassion" from those who stand against our laws and Law Enforcement. But compassion untethered from truth and Law and Order is not compassion. We are repeatedly told that to support immigration law enforcement, to insist on boundaries, or to affirm the rule of law -->> is “cruel,” “un-Christlike,” or evidence of moral failure. But Biblical compassion does not erase distinctions God Himself makes.
Love has boundaries. Mercy has form. Justice is not defined by feelings or slogans, but by God’s revealed will.
The same Scriptures that command neighbor-love also affirm lawful authority, accountability, and order. To collapse all moral reasoning into “stand with the hurting” is not Christian discernment -- it is sentimentality baptized in religious language.
Empathy detached from truth becomes toxic. It demands perpetual accommodation, refuses judgment of actions, and ultimately protects neither the vulnerable nor the common good.
A recurring refrain I read and hear insists that we should abandon labels -- Republican, Democrat -- and “just be good humans.” Other nice-sounding phrases that go along with this are, “Just be nice”... "Just be kind"... Being nice and kind is not the Gospel and not why Jesus came. He came, not to make people nice and kind, but to make dead people alive! And sometimes being nice, kind, loving, compassionate, etc. is being informed and standing on solid truth... which may lead us to taking a side.
True Christian niceness, kindness, love, and compassion must be tethered to and framed by Biblical truth. Christianity has never taught that morality floats above belief. Faith shapes conscience, and conscience informs action -- including political judgment. Yes, faith informs and frames politics - because politics IS IN GOD'S DOMAIN.
The problem is not that Christians land on different policy conclusions. The problem is pretending faith should remain abstract and cost-free, never pressing us to make hard distinctions or uncomfortable stands. Christian love is not sloppy. Christian justice is not vague. Christian compassion is not allergic to truth.
Folks, we can stand with people while we stand on true Christian principles. We can grieve real suffering. We can reject abuse, name-calling, and cruelty. We can insist on dignity and affirm infinite worth for every human being. We can do all of that without surrendering biblical clarity, without turning Jesus into a mascot for our preferred causes, and without confusing emotional intensity for moral insight.
Yes, standing with people matters, but it only means something when we are first standing on God’s Word. If we do not know God's Word - what we believe and why we believe it -- then we risk transforming Christianity into compassion without redemption, presence without forgiveness, and justice without truth -- which is a faith that comforts but does not save.
Jesus stands in the water -- yes, but He does so with His face already set toward the cross.
Biblical love of neighbor does not pit compassion against law and order. God’s Word holds them together. Law exists not to erase mercy, but to protect the neighbor from chaos, exploitation, and harm. To love the neighbor is not only to feel concern for those who suffer, but also to uphold the structures that restrain evil, preserve peace, and safeguard the vulnerable. A society without law is not more compassionate -- it is more dangerous. True Christian love, therefore, neither worships power nor despises authority, but recognizes both as gifts meant to serve human flourishing under God. We love our neighbor best not by dismantling order in the name of compassion, but by insisting that justice, mercy, and truth walk together.
(In anticipation of some push-back, or clarification, I offer a comment below)