10/25/2026
Cary’s Column
LDS vs. Christian Biblical Hermeneutics.
Let’s have a mini seminary course in hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is simply the study of how we interpret Scripture. Comparative Biblical Hermeneutics is a study that seminary students undertake — The study of how each religion interprets Scripture through the lens of their religion. This is very interesting and comes into play for many of us who are former Mormons.
Almost all of us Christians approach Scripture with assumptions shaped by many factors; upbringing, church, traditions, denominations, theological, education, favorite teachers, and past experiences. These factors become our lens every time we read our Bibles. Let me encourage you: Conservative Christian churches — more than any other religion on earth — interpret Scripture with scholarly exegesis. Exegesis is the study of drawing meaning out of the text. This contrasts with eisegesis, where religions put their preconceived meaning into the text. Eisegesis is how cults twist scripture.
I just gave you weeks of seminary study in that last paragraph, lol.
Our biblical mandate for scholarly exegetical study is 2 Timothy 2:15: “Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.”
Whereas the conservative Christian interpretive lens would primarily be scripture/grammar + context + comparing Scripture with Scripture, the Roman Catholic Church lens would add Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium to the Bible, and Mormonism would add additional scripture and continuing revelation to its unique biblical interpretation.
Here are two good examples where the Mormon interpretive lens, misses correctly, handling the word of truth:
1) What the Passage Actually Says.
The LDS Church interprets the New Testament from the King James English translation, not the original Greek text. Because English grammar lets us interpret a sentence in several ways Mormons can easily change the meaning of a biblical text originally written in Greek. A clear example is when Jesus is called “firstborn” as in Colossians 1:15. You may remember that the LDS teaching suggest this means Christ was “born first” in God‘s creation. “Firstborn”, however does not mean born first nor does it even imply birth. The Greek word used is prototakas meaning “priority and pre-eminence.” The LDS church came up with its own doctrine that Christ was born in creation, and uses the biblical word “firstborn” incorrectly, changing what the Bible actually says. Taking a word or a phrase from the King James translation and interpreting it as if the revelation had been given in that language is a dangerous method of study.
2) What the Bible Means in its Immediate Context.
The LDS take on the “two sticks of Judah” passage in Ezekiel 37 which is a clear Example of terrible Eisegesis — putting their preconceived meaning into the text. It reads:
“Again, the word of the Lord came to me saying, “As for you, son of man, take a stick for yourself and write on it: ‘ For Judah, and for the children of Israel, his companions.’ Then take another stick and write on it, “For Joseph, the stick of Ephram and for all the house of Israel, his companions.’ Then join them one to another for yourself into one stick and they will become one in your hand” (vs 15 to 17).
They interpret these two sticks to mean two bodies of scripture that God would bring together in the latter days: the Bible and the Book of Mormon.
This is not only an excellent example of missing what the passage actually means but it is also a humorous one. Christians know the two sticks mean the two kingdoms coming together as one nation. It would be nice if the text would tell us that something like, “Will you not show us what you mean by these?…Surely I will take the children of Israel from among the nations wherever they have gone, and will gather them from every side and bring them into their own land; and I will make them one nation in the land… they shall no longer be two nations, nor shall they ever be divided into two kingdoms again.” Don’t laugh, but this IS what the immediate context says (vs. 18 -22 ). The LDS Church commits terrible eisegesis like this throughout the Bible.
For more examples of LDS interpretation errors, please see my past articles.
Scholarly Christian churches recognize that “All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.”(2 Timothy 3:16). We need to be like the Berean Christians of Acts 17:11 and “examine the Scriptures every day to see what is true.” THIS is good hermeneutics.
From the Ex Mormons For Jesus newsletter, September/October 2026