06/01/2026
Contemplating today's Gospel: Monday 1 June 2026: Memorial of Saint Justin, Martyr: Monday of the Ninth Week in Ordinary Time: 1st Reading (2Pt 1:2-7); Responsorial Psalm: 90: R/. In you, my God, I place my trust. Gospel text (Mk 12:1-12): Let us recall the context in which Jesus proposes the parable we have just heard. Seeing him teaching in the Temple, "priests, scribes and elders" ask him: "By what authority do you do this? Or who gave you the authority to do it? "(11, 28). At first, Jesus evades the question by asking another, which concerns the origin of the baptism proposed by John - "did it come from heaven or men? "(11, 30). Faced with the hypocritical silence of his interlocutors, Our Lord in turn refuses to answer, considering that he is not accountable to men who claim to lead the people when they are unable to discern the heavenly origin of the Baptist ministry. However, Jesus does not remain for this purpose of not receiving. Through the parable he proposes to them, he will not only answer indirectly to the question posed to him, but he will also prophesy the paradoxical path by which his divine mission will be fulfilled. The scenario imagined by Notre-Seigneur presents a series of striking contrasts. So to begin with, we are surprised by the meticulous care that the owner takes to a vineyard, which he brutally leaves after having "rented it to winemakers". This unexpected turnaround seems to betray an amazing lightness; unless the "trip" is interpreted as a voluntary withdrawal, aimed at leaving all the space for the winemakers. In which case, the unexpected departure would be part of the conditions for a probation: are these workers worthy of the trust that the master places in them by letting them dispose of his property? The answer given by the parable is frankly negative: by hitting the first servant and knocking out the second, they signify their contempt for the owner. Breaking the rental contract, they affirm their autonomy and become masters of the field, refusing to report on their management. Drawn into the spiral of violence, these ungrateful winemakers even go so far as to murder the servant, apparently forgetting that they share the same status as him. This refusal of their condition is fully confirmed by the rest of the story: by killing "the beloved son", it is the position of heir that they try to usurp, as confirmed by their conciliabule: "Let's kill him and the inheritance will be ours! "Surprising reasoning: since when do murderers benefit from their victim's share of inheritance? Only the son is heir; by killing him, it is the Father they aim at; it is from him that they want to get rid of to appropriate his property. If they do not "respect" the son, it is because they ignore the sacredness of the filial relationship. They refuse to see the owner as a father, having locked him in the character of the rival who must be rid of at all costs to enjoy his property independently. This time, however, the measure is full. Having no one left to send, the master of the vine comes himself to execute the just sentence and "perishes the homicidal winemakers". However, he does not recover his property, but "gives the vine to others". It can be assumed that he "gives it in lease" as to the first winemakers, but the story does not specify it. Perhaps it should be heard that these new winemakers, having proven trustworthy, have gone from the status of servants to the filial condition, which they now share with the only and beloved son? Is not this what verses 22-23 of Psalm 118 quoted by Jesus suggest: "The stone which the builders rejected - namely the only Son of the Father - has become the cornerstone" of the house of God whose believers constitute the "living stones" (1 P 2, 5), participating in the faith in the divine filiation of the Lord Jesus Christ. Saint Mark specifies that "the leaders of the Jews had understood that it was for them that Jesus had said this parable"; they therefore recognized themselves in the characters of the homicidal winemakers. But they do not review their murderous projects, without realizing that by their hardening, they precisely confirm the outcome of the story. Lord, open our eyes to our complicity with the spirit of evil, which pushes us to challenge you as a jealous rival. At the heart of this world that boasts and rejoices at having “killed” you, we want to proclaim that you are the living God and the God of life; the Father full of tenderness and mercy, who triumphed over death by resurrecting Jesus, and who offers us to participate in his divine filiation in the Spirit. Also, we want to “approach you Lord, living stone, rejected by men, chosen by God” to attach ourselves to you by living faith and ardent charity.