Leavenworth County Kansans for Life

Leavenworth County Kansans for Life Pro-Life Chapter of Kansans for Life

03/30/2026

Join us for newsletter night on Tuesday, March 31 at 7 pm at Church of the Open Door, 20th and Eisenhower in Leavenworth. Many hands make fast work!

03/13/2026
02/10/2026
02/03/2026

A couple in Florida has sued an in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic after it was discovered that the baby the mother gave birth to had no genetic relation to the couple. Experts say the case highlights the ongoing lack of regulation governing the $5 billion IVF industry and the human dignity violations inherent in the practice.

Tiffany Score and Steven Mills allege in their lawsuit that Score’s uterus was implanted by another patient’s embryo in April 2025 by reproductive endocrinologist Dr. Milton McNichol at the IVF Life, Inc. fertility clinic in Orlando. The couple had previously stored three viable embryos at the facility in 2020. When the couple gave birth to their “beautiful, healthy female child” in December 2025, it was obvious that the baby was a “non-Caucasian child,” unlike the couple. Genetic testing later confirmed that the baby girl had “no genetic relationship” to either Score or Mills.

In January, the couple’s attorney, John Scarola, sent a letter to the clinic “demanding it unite the baby ‘with her genetic parents’ and explain what happened to his clients’ embryos.” As reported by the New York Post, the couple “also fear another person may have been implanted with their embryo and could be pregnant with or raising their child.” In the meantime, the lawsuit notes, Score and Mills formed an “intensely strong emotional bond” with the baby during pregnancy and “have fallen in love with this child.” While the couple says they are willing to raise the child as their own, they still feel obliged to return the baby to her biological parents if they come forward.

The mix-up occurred within an IVF industry that is largely unregulated in the U.S. Currently, there are no legal limits on how many embryos a couple can produce, which has resulted in approximately 1.5 million embryos currently being frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen tanks indefinitely. In addition, it is estimated that 50% of all embryos created in labs for IVF purposes are discarded. With approximately four million being created in the U.S. annually, this means that about two million embryos are killed per year in the U.S. IVF companies now allow parents to pick the s*x, hair color, and eye color (as well as predictions about height, IQ, and disease risk) based on the embryos they produce and discard the rest.

As for Score and Mills’s misplaced embryos and the birth of their unrelated baby, their lawsuit asks for emergency court action “to force the clinic to alert all affected patients, pay for widespread genetic testing, and disclose whether other families may have been impacted by the embryo mix-up.”

But during an emergency hearing held last week, Judge Margaret Schreiber observed that there is little legal precedent in which to allow the case to move forward. “There’s not a lot of Florida law for you all to reach a resolution that will provide the answers that the plaintiffs in this case are seeking, and the protections that the defendants are wanting to ensure remain in place for their clients,” she noted.

Experts like Mary Szoch, who serves as director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, say that IVF unnecessarily drags couples through avoidable heartache and moral quandaries.

“The story of Tiffany Score and Steven Mills suing an IVF business because IVF doctors wrongly implanted someone else’s embryo in her body, resulting in her giving birth to someone else’s child, is horrific,” she told The Washington Stand. “Tiffany and Steven must be constantly worrying that someone — the child’s biological parents — will one day ask for the girl that they have loved and cared for back, and they must also be wondering where their children are.”

“This is one of the major issues with the IVF industry,” Szoch continued. “Once a third party is involved in the procreation of children, there is no way to know that the third party is acting with as much love and care as parents would. How often do ‘mix-ups’ happen? If biological parents happen to locate their son or daughter years down the road when the child is six or seven, do the biological parents still have the right to demand their child back? How often do IVF businesses just use someone else’s s***m or eggs because it’s more profitable to continue the IVF process?”

These are concerns that Dr. David Prentice, a bioethicist and president of the newly launched Science Alliance for Life and Technology (SALT), echoed on Monday’s “Washington Watch.” “IVF itself is a complicated situation,” he told guest host Jody Hice. “First, we’re very thankful this little girl is alive. She’s a survivor. Because with IVF, at most, about 10% of the embryos that are created during the IVF procedure ever make it to live birth. And so, we celebrate the fact that she’s alive. But it’s really a business. It’s an industry. It’s not so much a medical practice as a way to make a lot of embryos, a lot of human beings, and then try to get them to the point of birth, but for an exorbitant price.”

He added, “And she’s also a survivor [because of] the fact that she was frozen as an embryo and then thawed out, transferred to the mother’s womb, and gestated to birth, because up to half of the little ones who are frozen don’t survive that thawing process. So yes,” Prentice said somberly, “this industry is pretty much unregulated. They make a lot of claims about how they will produce a child for these infertile couples, but then they really don’t follow any standard medical practice. … And it really needs a lot of scrutiny and oversight.”

“In an industry where people are legally considered property, offenses against the dignity of the human person automatically take place,” Szoch concluded. “Let’s pray for the day when the dignity of every person is respected, and the IVF industry is held accountable for preying on the good and Godly desire of parents to have children.”

As Szoch and other experts have pointed out, natural conception alternatives to IVF known as restorative reproductive medicine like NaPro, FEMM, and the Billings Ovulation Method are widely available, which look for and treat the underlying causes of infertility.

𝑊𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝐷𝑎𝑛 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑡. 𝑃𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑.

01/27/2026

WOW!

Tens of thousands of people protested abortion at the West Coast Walk for Life in San Francisco this weekend.

01/23/2026

Fellow Lifers-

Due to severe cold and wind with expected snow we are cancelling the annual candlelight vigil due to an abundance of caution and frostbite danger as well as chance of slip and fall.
Please say prayers for the unborn as well as for all stages of life.

Please let your friends and other KFL's and church members know.

Greg Beck
Leavenworth County KFL President

01/23/2026

My uncle’s dream involves the flourishing of the next generation. If we continue to allow Planned Parenthood and the Pro-Abortion movement to destroy our children, the dream can’t survive.

01/06/2026

⚠️ After withholding the data from public view for nearly the entire year, Governor Laura Kelly and the Kansas Department of Health & Environment quietly posted Kansas’ 2024 abortion statistics in the final hours of 2025.

Why was critical public health data withheld for so long -- especially given the shocking increase in abortions performed on minor girls? 📈

Read our full statement: https://kfl.org/kelly-administration-quietly-releases-statistics-in-final-hours-of-2025-raising-major-questions-about-the-shocking-rise-in-abortions-performed-on-minor-girls/

01/06/2026

Tonight’s the night - Tuesday, January 6 Newsletter workshop and we need everyone we can get because many regulars are unable to attend. Planning the Candlelight Vigil as well. Church of the Open Door at 7 pm.

10/15/2025
10/10/2025

Life and death on the line in a Johnson County courtroom

News and analysis by Lucrecia Nold, public policy specialist for the Kansas Catholic Conference

Most politically engaged Kansans are aware of the infamous 2019 Kansas Supreme Court decision called Hodes vs Schmidt. This High Court decision, instigated by the Kansas abortion industry, created a new constitutional “right” to abortion within the state of Kansas.

That ruling meant every legal safeguard protecting women and their preborn children was suddenly and radically “presumed unconstitutional.” Yes, certain laws were still technically in the books, but they had no teeth, and no real strength.

When the Value Them Both amendment vote failed in 2022, the horrific Kansas Supreme Court decision became further entrenched. The abortion industry then did what was predicted (and ignored by the secular press)—they began suing in court for the formal removal of all protections for women and preborn babies.

An attack on healthcare protection for women is exactly what is happening now in a trial playing out in a Johnson County courtroom in a case known as Hodes & Nauser v. Kobach.

Specifically, the abortion industry wants to end the Women’s Right to Know Act (or the WRTK for short), which has been a part of Kansas law since 1997. A legal team hired by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach is trying to save the WRTK. Secular news media coverage of the trial is virtually non-existent.

A LEGACY OF PROTECTING WOMEN

WRTK was first passed to make sure women seeking an abortion could at least receive basic healthcare information about their pregnancy and the abortion option so they could make a fully informed choice.

This healthcare information included the option of receiving a sonogram image to help document their preborn child’s development. WRTK also included a 24-hour waiting period. In recent years, additional provisions to WRTK were passed, including abortion pill reversal information, and an optional questionnaire seeking the reason for an abortion.

Almost a year ago, a Kansas judge stopped all enforcement of the WRTK. Remember, most provisions of the WRTK have been in place informing and protecting Kansas women for 25+ years! The Kansas abortion industry has taken full advantage of this legal imbalance.

Kansas is now the abortion destination of the Midwest, with 60+ abortions taking place each day. This “pause” in enforcing the law (known as a temporary injunction), is now being permanently decided at a trial.

INSIDE THE COURTROOM

One “expert witness” brought by the abortion industry was an abortion doctor who sounded like a woman but looked and dressed like a man and requested “they/them” pronouns be used. The abortion industry also called to the stand a professor of law, the CEO/President of Comprehensive Health & Planned Parenthood Great Plains, a medical sociologist, a researcher and a professor of public health.

These witnesses followed an overarching theme in their testimony: the WRTK prohibits their ability to see patients and perform abortions. The 24-hour waiting period stops “same day” abortions. Signage with abortion pill reversal information distracts, prompts (unwanted) questions, and takes up too much staff time.

One witness was concerned about the WRTK creating abortion stigma and even testified that a ban after 36 weeks gestation (ready to begin labor and give birth) should not be allowed because it would cause a stigma!

There were numerous gasp-worthy comments made by witnesses during the opening days of the trial. Little is left to the imagination about the weight of this trial and its implication on protecting lives of women and their preborn children.

This trial will be decided by one judge. If he sides with the abortion industry, the Kansas Women’s Right to know law will be completely struck down. Women (and their preborn children) from Kansas and other states will be permanently at risk.

The trial will resume Tuesday, October 14, 2025, in the Johnson County Courthouse in Olathe, courtroom 2D at 9:00am. It is not known when a decision will be issued.

ADDITIONAL PERSPECTIVES

To learn more about the trial, we encourage you to check out the following news articles:

Op-Ed: The battle for informed consent: Kansas pro life law under threat- by our friend Brittany Jones of Kansas Family Voice.

Planned Parenthood and abortionists want to end informed consent in Kansas- by our friend Isabella Childs of Live Action.

Address

KFL, P. O. Box 164
Lansing, KS
66043

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Leavenworth County Kansans for Life posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Leavenworth County Kansans for Life:

Share