Analyzing Baha'i Beliefs

Analyzing Baha'i Beliefs Is the Bahá’í World Faith founder the promised return of Jesus of Nazareth?

05/20/2022

In an Internet dialogue Bahá’í Ruhi9 (pseudonym) writes: “I believe Christ’s blood has nothing to do with it [salvation]. I must admit it upsets and angers me that Christians plant their whole faith in Christ on His crucifixion and His resurrection … He didn’t come to die on the cross.”
Actually, Christ did come to die on the cross, fulfilling prophecy and the condition of Leviticus 17:11. Shedding His blood had everything to do with Jesus’ mission. Hebrews 10:28–29 has a stark warning for those who regard Jesus’ blood as less than obligatory and efficacious for salvation: “Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. (29) Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled [figuratively, “to reject with scorn”] the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common [literally, “unholy or unhallowed”] thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace?” (Brackets added).
Jesus and Paul cite the necessity of His suffering and death. Jesus said, “… thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day” (Luke 24:46; emphasis added); Then Paul went in and “…reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and demonstrating that the Christ had to suffer and rise again from the dead … saying, ‘This Jesus whom I preach to you is the Christ’ ” (Acts 17:2–3; emphasis added).
Jesus said His blood is the symbol of the new covenant: “For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for the remission of sins” in Matthew 26:28; as did the writer of Hebrews: “Now may the God of peace who brought up our Lord Jesus from the dead, that great Shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, make you complete in every good work to do His will …” (Hebrews 13:20; emphases added). His blood redeems believers from their sins, removing the enmity between God and man:
• Acts 20:28 ... and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God, which He has purchased with His own blood (brackets and all emphases added).
• Romans 3:24–25 … being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness ...
• Romans 5:9 ... having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him.
• Ephesians 1:7, 2:13 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace. (2:13) … you who were once far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.
• Colossians 1:14,19–20 ... in whom we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins. (19) For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, (20) and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on the earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.
• Hebrews 9:12,14–16, 22 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Most Holy Place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption ... (14) how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God? (15) And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. (16) For where there is a testament, there must also be the death of the testator. (22) ... according to the law almost all things are purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no remission.
• 1Peter 1:2,19 ... elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ. (19) ... with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.
• 1John 1:7 But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin.
• Revelation 1:5 ... Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead ... ruler over the kings of the earth. To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood.
• Revelation 5:9 You are worthy to take the scroll, and to open its seals; for You were slain, and have redeemed us to God by Your blood out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation.
• Revelation 12:11 And they overcame him [Satan] by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, and they did not love their lives to the death.

Let us compare Ruhi9 words about Jesus’ sacrifice with those of Clement of Rome in his Letter to the Corinthians (A.D. 80), a few years after Christ’s death: “Let us look steadfastly to the blood of Christ, and see how precious that blood is to God, which, having been shed for our salvation, has set the grace of repentance before the whole world.”
Polycarp writes in Second Letter to the Philippians (A.D. 135): “For whosoever does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh, is antichrist;” and whosoever does not confess the testimony of the cross, is of the devil; and whosoever perverts the oracles of the Lord to his own lusts, and says that there is neither a resurrection nor a judgment, he is the first-born of Satan ... let us return to the word which has been handed down to us from the beginning; “watching unto prayer.”

03/30/2022

The BWF attempts to downplay the catastrophic events of the Great Tribulation seen in both Testaments of the Bible, including the warnings of Jesus in Matthew 24:21-- “For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be..."

‘Abdu’l-Bahá entirely changes the meaning of the three "woes" of Revelation chapters 9 and 12.

The first "woe" he says is the appearance of Muhammad, and the second "woe" was the coming and death of the Báb; then “This third woe … is the day of the Manifestation of Bahá’u’lláh, the Day of God, and it is near to the day of the appearance of the Báb” (‘Abdu’l-Bahá, Some Answered Questions, p. 56; Shoghi Effendi, God Passes By, p. 92).

The term "woe" literally is: “an expression of grief, deep sorrow, indignation, misfortune or calamity,” whether it is in Greek, Hebrew, or English. It is not a term of optimism, cheerfulness or joy, but of “deep sorrow” or trouble (Daniel 12:1), for God’s wrath is coming on the sinful world. The woes are plagues, bringing death to one-third of mankind (Revelation 9:15).

The third woe is not the coming of someone called Bahá’u’lláh, unless he is the devil⎯ “Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time (Revelation 12:12). And finally the woes surrounding the end time’s prophecies of the great tribulation will be the worst in human history and have nothing to do with the advent of Muhammad, the Báb or Bahá’u’lláh. These woes will lead to a greater holocaust than N**i Germany and will affect the entire world.

This is just another example of the BWF taking a universal biblical term and twisting it to fit its preconceived ideology.

01/17/2022

After leaving Egypt the Israelites turned to “false” gods (Judges 2:11–12). Biblically there is only one “true and living” God (John 17:3), but historically people have worshipped false gods, which were actually demons (Deuteronomy 32:16–17; Psalm 106:37). In 1Corinthians 10:20 Paul wrote that first century non-Jews, which included followers of at least three of the BWF Manifestations (Zoroaster, Buddha, and Krishna), “sacrifice to demons” and not to the true God.

Daniel 2:48; 4:9; 5:11 state Daniel (AKA Belteshazzar), was made “Rab-Mag” Chief of the magi (wise men) in King Nebuchadnezzar’s court circa 580 B.C. Later, when the Medo-Persians conquered the Babylonians, King Darius the Mede, a Zoroastrian worshipper of Ahura Mazda (Bahá’ís claim this is one of many names for the one true God, also called YHWH or Allah), placed his Zoroastrian priests under Daniel’s authority. In direct contradiction to Ahura Mazda being identical with YHWH, after viewing the miracle of Daniel in the lions’ den, Darius states in Daniel 6:26, “I make a decree that in every dominion of my kingdom men must tremble and fear before the God of Daniel. For He is the living God, and steadfast forever; His kingdom is the one which shall not be destroyed, and His dominion shall endure to the end.” To Darius the Zoroastrian god Ahura Mazda was not YHWH, the God of Daniel the Israelite (see vv. 6:16, 20), therefore, according to Paul’s conclusion in 1Corinthians 10:20, Ahura Mazda was a demon.

Some Bahá’í authors argue the magi who visited infant Jesuswere Zoroastrians following the prophecies written by their founder. Many of the magi at the Babylonian and Medo-Persian courts were Zoroastrian priests; others were Chaldean.

Interestingly, Daniel saved their lives since he could interpret the king’s dream while they could not, and with the aid of an angel could seal up the mouths of hungry lions, leading Nebuchadnezzar and Darius to call Daniel’s God “the God of gods” vs. 2:47 and “the living God” 6:26–27. Since Daniel was chief magi for over 50 years, whose Hebrew Bible cites the “star out of Jacob” (Numbers 24:17) and who personally wrote the prophecy relating to the time of the coming of Messiah (Daniel 9:24–26), it seems more than likely the magi were informed by Daniel their leader, rather than Zoroaster. Both Nebuchadnezzar and Darius recognized their gods were not the One True God. were Zoroastrians following the prophecies written by their founder. Many of the magi at the

11/14/2021

The Bible emphatically states Jesus, the Son of God, will return personally to earth, not someone else in His stead. It never mentions a reappearing “Christ-spirit” returning repeatedly through the millennia as multiple Manifestations in a continuous stream of “dispensations.”

The disciples asked Jesus of Nazareth when He would return in Matthew 24:3, 27, 30.

(3) ... as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age? ... (27) For as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be ... (30) Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven ... all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory (emphasis added).

The following verses show it would be Jesus whom the apostles expected and not a Persian aristocrat with His “bounty, the perfections, the character, the qualities and virtues.”

• Mark 8:38 For whosoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.
• John 14:2–3, 28 In My Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. (3) And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also. (28) You have heard Me say to you, ‘I am going away and coming back to you ...’
• Acts 1:11 This same Jesus who was taken up from you into heaven will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven.
• Acts 3:20–21 ... [God] may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before, (21) whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken of by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.
• Philippians 3:20–21 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, (21) who will transform our lowly body that it may be conformed to His glorious body, according to the working by which He is able even to subdue all things to Himself.
• 1 Thessalonians 1:10; 2:19; 4:16–17 (1:10) ... wait for His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, even Jesus who delivers us from the wrath to come. (2:19) For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Is it not even you in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at His coming? (4:16) For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. (4:17) Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air ... we shall always be with the Lord.
• Titus 1:13 Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.
• Hebrews 9:28 ... Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many. To those who eagerly wait for Him He will appear a second time ... for salvation.
• Revelation 22:12–13, 16, 20 And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. (13) I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last. (16) I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star. (20) He who testifies to these things says, ‘Surely I am coming quickly.’ Amen. Even so, come quickly Lord Jesus! (All emphases added).

None of these verses claim a “Christ-spirit” would come, but Jesus Himself will appear a second time (Hebrews 9:28), not a fourth or fourteenth time. The angels in Acts 1:11 claimed the “same Jesus” would return in “the same way” He left—in clouds from the Mount of Olives. Zechariah 14:3–4 state in the end times: “Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as He fights in the day of battle. (4) And in that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which faces Jerusalem on the east … ” (Emphasis added).

Shoghi Effendi and others assert that Ezekiel 43:4–7, which state the “glory of God” will come from the east, points to the second coming as being from Persia (Iran), east of Jerusalem:

"And the glory of the LORD came into the temple by way of the gate, which faces toward the east. The Spirit lifted me up and brought me into the inner court; and behold, the glory of the LORD filled the temple. Then I heard Him speaking to me from the temple, while a man stood beside me. And He said to me, “Son of man, this is the place of My throne and the place of the soles of My feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel forever…”

Baha'i author Hushidar Motlagh blurs a vital point in this verse by replacing “glory of the LORD” with “Bahá’u’lláh” (e.g. “Bahá’u’lláh came up to the temple … Bahá’u’lláh filled the temple …”) and sums up his argument: “Ezekiel’s vision was literally fulfilled when Bahá’u’lláh, the Glory of God, came as an exile from the east, for Persia stands to the east of Israel.” Motlagh misdirects attention from the central idea of vs. 7 that God’s glory will not dwell on Mt. Carmel, as Bahá’ís contend, but will dwell in Jerusalem forever, and only shows the glory comes from the east and will dwell among the Israelites, ignoring the necessity of God’s presence in the Jerusalem temple. Two problems emerge: 1) Bahá’u’lláh never entered Jerusalem’s temple by any gate since it had been destroyed centuries before his birth; 2) Akko, where he spent the last 24 years of his life, is on the Mediterranean Sea coast, northwest of Jerusalem, not east. Bahá’u’lláh had not been east of Jerusalem for nearly a quarter century, and there was no temple extant during his lifetime.

"

09/19/2021

BWF authors claim Jesus came in the station of the Son, then diminish the idea of His being the Son of God by showing Adam, angels, and even Jesus’ followers are also called sons of God, so His title is not exclusive. The difference is Jesus is the only begotten Son (Gk. μονογενής, monogenēs, implying a “unique relationship” no one else has with the Father). John does not use υἱός, huihos ‘son’ of the believer, he reserves that title for the Lord, but he does use τέκνον, teknon ‘child’ as in his Gospel, 1:12; 1 John 3:1–2; Revelation 21:7; (huihos) is a quotation from 2 Samuel 7:14 (LXX). This shows a different relationship between Jesus as the Son by nature and His followers as sons by adoption. This adoption is clearly related to “regeneration” as seen in James 1:18; 1Peter 1:23 and Titus 3:5–6 which states, (5) “… not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, (6) whom He poured out on us abundantly through Christ Jesus our Savior, that having been justified by His grace we should become heirs according to the hope of eternal life (emphases added).”
Jesus is the Son of God by eternal nature (John 1:18; 3:16–18; 1John 4:9), whereas Adam and the others cited are sons either by direct creation or adoption. Jesus existed throughout eternity before His incarnation on earth as the Son of God (Psalm 2:7–12; Proverbs 30:4; John 1:1; Philippians 2:6; 1John 1:2). Some first-century Jews understood Jesus’ claim and attempted to kill Him for making Himself “God” or “equal with God” (John 5:18; 8:59; 10:39).

07/03/2021

In an Internet dialogue with Bahá’í member Don, who had his own Bahá’í -promoting website, I wrote, “The ‘Spirit of truth’ came to Jesus’ apostles on Pentecost at the birth of Christ’s church … The Holy Spirit did come to them as seen in all of Acts 2.” Don’s reply was interesting:

"Why jump from the 'Spirit of Truth' to the 'Holy Spirit?' Could you possibly be confusing 2 things? I think the 'Spirit of Truth' was the Comforter/Paraclete and not the Holy Spirit. In fact, the word ‘Holy’ is not in some of the oldest New Testament manuscripts ... Many scholars feel that the word written 'Paraclete' was altered from the original 'Periklytos.' "

First of all, Muslim and Bahá’í scholars are the ones using this argument. They render Periklytos into Arabic as “Ahmad,” or “Praised One,” supposedly a name for Muhammad as found in Surah 61:6, “And when Jesus son of Mary said, ‘O children of Israel, I am the Apostle of God to you, confirming that which came before me in the Torah, and preaching good news of an apostle to come after me whose name is Ahmad.”

Muslims claim Christians altered this word attempting to eliminate the prophecy about Muhammad. There are more than 5,700 ancient Greek manuscripts or fragments and none of those containing John 14 include the word Periklytos. Many of them were written centuries before Muhammad’s birth. Some Muslims cite the spurious Gospel of Barnabas (A.D. 1588 to 1620), as containing Periklytos. The earliest extant copy, written in Italian, is in the Austrian National Library. It contains quotes from the Qur’an and the thirteenth century Dante’s Divine Comedy. Muslim scholar Cyril Glossé calls it a “Medieval forgery” in his New Encyclopedia of Islam. Further, the Journal of Biblical Apologetics vol. 6, Number 3, p. 44 explains:

"There exists no textual or linguistic evidence to support the notion that the word Periklytos was corrupted to Paracletos. Every ancient manuscript found from 200 C.E. [A.D.] onward contains only the latter. Unlike ancient Hebrew or Arabic, the Greek language has the vowels of a word written out ... the word Periklytos is never once used in either the Old Testament Greek (the Septuagint) or Greek Koine writing of the New Testament."

The Journal also explains the absence of “Holy” in John 14:26 occurs only in one instance, the 5th century Syriac manuscript, yet all Greek manuscripts predating the Syriac by several centuries do contain the word Holy. Quintas Tertullian, 500 years before Muhammad, states it was the “Holy Ghost” who was sent as the “teacher of truth” at Jesus’ request in John 14:26; 15:26.

Bahá’í Don continues: “We also find the masculine he is identified with the Spirit of truth, and not the neuter it that would have been proper for the neutral Greek word for spirit ‘pneu’ma [πνεῦμα].”

But, throughout the Bible, God, a spirit (John 4:24 uses the same Greek word, pneuma,) is constantly referred to as He. The Holy Spirit is also referred to with personal pronouns “He” (John 14:26), “I, Me”(Acts 10:20; 13:2), “Himself, He” (Romans 8:26–27). The Holy Spirit, the Spirit of truth, and God the Father, a spirit, are all referred to in the masculine gender with personal pronouns.

03/07/2021

The BWF declares the Báb’s Proclamation to be a Manifestation of God in 1844 followed by Bahá’u’lláh’s in 1863 fulfill the specifics of Jesus’ promise to return in His glory with all the angels of heaven (Matthew 25:31), while also fulfilling the prophecy given in Daniel 8 by the Angel Gabriel:

Daniel 8:13–14 Then I heard a holy one speaking, and another holy one said to him, “How long will it take for the vision to be fulfilled—the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, the rebellion that causes desolation, and the surrender of the sanctuary and of the host that will be trampled underfoot?” (14) He said to me, “It will take 2,300 evenings and mornings; then the sanctuary will be reconsecrated.”

Many problems arise from the BWF’s forced prophetic interpretation of Daniel 8. The most significant difficulty is the use of date setting by an angel from heaven to claim Bahá’u’lláh fulfills the timing in Daniel 8, as the return of Jesus. Quite simply, Daniel 8 is not about the return of Jesus. Further, Jesus’ own words in Mark 13:32 preclude anyone from date setting: “… not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father …” knows the time of His return (see Matthew 24:36, 42–44, 25:13). As an angel from heaven, Gabriel did not have and could not have the information. Further, in Acts 1:6 the disciples asked Jesus: “Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?” He answered: “It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has put in His own authority,” showing the Father’s privileged position.

Clearly, it is ludicrous for Jesus to state the angels of heaven did not know the time of His second coming 500 years after an angel had told Daniel the precise year. Why didn’t Jesus just say, “Read Daniel 8:13–14 and you will know”? Instead, He said only His Father knows.

Logically stated, it looks like this:
a) Jesus stated the angels of heaven did not know the time of His earthly return.
b) Gabriel is an angel of heaven (Daniel 8:15; Luke 1:19, 28).
c) Therefore, Gabriel did not know the time of Jesus’ return.

Or it could look like this:

a) Only God the Father knows the time of Jesus’ return.
b) Gabriel is an angel and not God the Father.
c) Therefore, the angel Gabriel did not know the time of Jesus’ return.

Since this simple logic contradicts the BWF view, how does the religion answer it? As a further error on the BWF authors’ position, in order to claim Gabriel did know, they alter Gabriel’s angelic nature, claiming Jesus was not talking about Gabriel not knowing. BWF authors maneuver around Mark 13:32, by redefining the problematic word angels to mean human beings and not powerful spirit beings to support their position. Michael Sours writes:
"In the Kitáb-i-Íqán, Bahá’u’lláh explains that by ‘angels’ is meant individuals who 'reinforced by the power of the spirit, have consumed, with the fire of the love of God, all human traits and limitations, and have clothed themselves with the attributes of the most exalted Beings” [and of the Cherubim] ‘Abdu’l-Bahá stated to a small group of Bahá’ís in 1912: “Array yourselves in the perfection of divine virtues. I hope you may be quickened and vivified by the breaths of the Holy Spirit. Then shall ye indeed become the angels of the heaven whom Christ promised would appear in this Day … to gather the harvest of divine planting.”

BWF author Thomas Tai-Seale also writes:

The word “angel” may be better understood as “saint,’’ as is used in Paul’s letters to the Thessalonians. Maybe, then, the angels are the new believers themselves, those who recognize the Promised One when He comes. But if this is so, then we have not been promised a visible fantastic thing [Jesus returning in the clouds with His angels from heaven]. Saints are hard to recognize. Would we recognize a Peter or a Paul if we saw him in our day? Would we quarrel with him if his message was new?

Evidently, the BWF authors and Jesus are talking about two totally different natures of beings. The word angel(s) [Gk. αγγειλος] appears 82 times in the NT and never does it mean humans “consumed with the fire of the love of God.” Every time angels is used, it refers to powerful spirit-being messengers of God who reside in heaven; beings existing before man. Tai-Seale fails to see when Jesus descends from heaven, He will send “all the holy angels” Matthew 25:31 accompanying Him to gather His elect—His saints [Gk. άγιος, hagios]. These beings are not 20,000 to 40,000 Bábí/Bahá’í men massacred by Muslims. Paul, referred to by Tai-Seale, wrote, “… when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels to be glorified in His saints” (2Thessalonians 1:7–10). Angels and saints—both types of beings are cited here.

More about angels in this context is found in Matthew 13:41, 49; 16:27 and 18:10 which states: “Take heed that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you in heaven their angels always see the face of My Father who is in heaven” and Matthew 25:31; 26:53. In Luke 1:19, 26 we read Gabriel is an angel from heaven who stands in the presence of God as is Michael who stands up in Daniel 12 at the time of the great tribulation and leads his angels to fight against Satan and his demonic angels in Revelation 12:7.

Therefore, all the angels (100 million+) come with Jesus from heaven, and call the elect (Gk. ἐκλεκτοὺς, eklektos) who are Jesus’ saints, again showing two different classes of beings. The saints will judge the angels (1 Corinthians 6:2–3). To force its point, the BWF transforms angels into believers on fire for the cause, changing the context of passages such as 2 Thessalonians 1:7–8, “… you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, (8) in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ” (emphasis added).

Paul is not saying, nor was Jesus in Mark 13:32, “that angels signify or can refer to persons living in this world whose lives are completely sanctified,” as Sours states. Jesus said “angels in heaven” and Paul wrote, “… when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels …” positionally and grammatically they are with Him in heaven. The word cherubim (a class of angelic beings) is deleted by Sours without explanation from his quote in Tablet to The Christians. Nowhere does the Bible call human beings “cherubim.”

01/31/2021

According to An Examination of the Bahá’í Webpage:
"Welcome to Prophecy-fulfilled.com" by Bahá’í author Joel Smith.

Position #7) MESSIAH COMES WITH A NEW NAME
Smith writes: "Isaiah next promises that the 'redeemer' will appear with a 'new name.' He wrote: 'I will give them an everlasting name that shall not be cut off.' -Isaiah 56 Again he promises: 'thou shalt be called by a new name which the mouth of the Lord shall name.' -Isaiah 62 And again he warned: 'ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord God shall slay thee and call his servants by another name.' -Isaiah 65"

Glory of God (Bahá’u’lláh’s chosen title) is not a new name since it appears 264 times throughout the OT. In Isaiah 56:4-5 God says that even “eunuchs who keep My Sabbaths, and choose what pleases Me, and hold fast My covenant…I will give them an everlasting name that shall not be cut off.' He is not giving the Messiah a new name here. Isaiah chapter 62 is written about the city of Jerusalem, not the Messiah. In Isaiah 62 we are told:

(1) “For Zion’s sake I will not hold My peace, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not rest, until her righteousness goes forth as brightness, and her salvation as a lamp that burns... (4) the new name for Jerusalem will be Hephzibah, which means ‘My delight is in her’… (6) I have set watchmen on your walls, O Jerusalem; (7) … And till He makes Jerusalem a praise in the earth.”

All one has to do is read in Revelation, especially 19:9–16, to see several of Jesus’ new names: the Lamb; Faithful and True; KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS; the Word of God; and a name which no one knows but He Himself. Nowhere among these names is the conqueror of Revelation 19 called, Bahá’u’lláh’s self-appointed title, which translated means Glory of Allah or Glory of God.

The secret name is one only Jesus knows. The term "glory of God" is found throughout Scripture and is not a new secret name, which no one knows. Judeo-Christian literature often speaks of the glory of God, understood to be the totality of God’s attributes, an amazingly glorious thing indeed. In the Book of Revelation, we are given many names for Jesus Christ as titles:

1:8 Alpha and the Omega 5:5 Lion of Judah; Root of David
1:8 Lord 5:6 Lamb
1:8 Almighty 7:17 Shepherd
1:13 Son of Man 12:10 Christ
1:17 First & Last 19:11 Faithful and True
1:18 He who lives 19:13 The Word of God
2:18 Son of God 19:16 King of kings
3:14 Witness 19:16 Lord of lords
4:11 Creator 22:16 Bright and Morning Star

So, in summation, Jesus the Christ is never called the glory of God in the NT, because He is actually God. But He has many titles given in this testament especially the Book of Revelation. Isaiah 62 verses 1-7 are written about Jerusalem, not the coming of Messiah.

Address

P O Box 2142
Laguna Hills, CA
92654

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Analyzing Baha'i Beliefs posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Analyzing Baha'i Beliefs:

Shortcuts

Share

Category