Avadhutashram

Avadhutashram The Avadhutashram is a peaceful religious hindu place headquarters of Prabhuji Mission

The Avadhutashram is the residence of Prabhuji and the headquarters of the Prabhuji Mission, located in the Catskill Mountains in New York State, USA. The Prabhuji Ashram, spread over 47 acres of forest and creeks, is home to different species of birds. This rural area with its clean air serves as a natural refuge for a wide variety of flora and fauna. It is a place that promotes harmony and integration between body, mind, and soul.

"Sometimes I am asked a question that, although understandable, rests on a fundamental misunderstanding: ‘Are you enligh...
05/22/2025

"Sometimes I am asked a question that, although understandable, rests on a fundamental misunderstanding: ‘Are you enlightened?’ or ‘Are you an enlightened person?’ The question presupposes that enlightenment is a state that can be possessed by a subject, like someone who obtains a merit or reaches a higher category. However, if we accept the term “enlightenment,” it should be understood not as a personal achievement, but as radical disillusionment. It is not an inner achievement that the “separate self” can display, but the collapse of the very idea of an “autonomous self” that must or can achieve something.
When someone declares themselves enlightened, they have not awakened: they have constructed a new fiction around their ideal image. It is the ego that utters the phrase “I have awakened,” but genuine awakening consists precisely in seeing that this “I” was an illusory structure, sustained by the habit of self-assertion and the fear of dissolution. At the moment of awakening—if such a moment is possible—the urgency to define oneself, to defend oneself, to validate oneself vanishes. What once seemed essential loses all weight, as when at dawn the contours of dreams dissolve and there is no longer any need to flee or hold on. It is not a matter of denying subjective experience or rejecting ordinary forms of identity. It is about understanding that suffering finds its most constant root in the assumption that there is an autonomous, fixed, and central self. Enlightenment, in this sense, is not an extraordinary experience, but a lucid perception of what has always been so. It does not burst in with fanfare. It arrives without an owner, without an argument, without affirmation.
When that structure falls, an idealized version of oneself does not emerge. The real appears, in its elemental nakedness. Air, light, and minimal gestures appear, without the need to attribute transcendent meaning to them. The one who has awakened is not the one who accumulates answers. It is the one who no longer needs to hide behind justifications. Language ceases to be a shield. It becomes seeing silence.
The question is not who has awakened, but how much illusion remains to be let go. To seek enlightenment as a form of exceptionality is to remain trapped in the logic of the self. Awakening, if it occurs, does not confer superiority. It frees one from the suffering that arises from identifying with an image that was never stable. No one awakens to become something different. One awakens to stop fearing what one is when one has stopped pretending.
Like bamboo, which does not know it is hollow, but allows the wind to pass through. Like the mountain, which does not know it is high, but transforms with its presence. So too, consciousness does not need to proclaim itself enlightened. It is enough that it stops casting a shadow.
Rūmī, in his luminous poetry, whispers it with the sweetness of one who has seen:
“Come out of yourself, as water comes out of a spring. What you seek, you already are.”
The essential is not in achieving something. Nothing needs to be added to what already is. There is no further state to which we must ascend. What we are does not need to be perfected: it only needs to be remembered. When the representation of a self that acts to assert itself ceases, there is no superior individual left. What remains is life, as it is: open, silent, irreducible.
And that, without embellishment, is enough."

Prabhuji

"There is a moment—not always obvious, but decisive—when the compulsion to accumulate weakens and the need to understand...
05/22/2025

"There is a moment—not always obvious, but decisive—when the compulsion to accumulate weakens and the need to understand imposes itself with silent force. The desire remains, but its orientation is transformed. It ceases to be driven by quantity and begins to seek direction. It no longer aspires to excess, but to truth. This vital inflection does not usually manifest itself with spectacular gestures or fireworks. It bursts into the ordinary: into the emptiness that follows a goal achieved, into the unease that follows a meaningless celebration, into the fatigue that cannot be explained by physical exertion alone. In this unscheduled interruption, a question arises that, although it has no definite form, demands an answer.
My friend, the search for meaning does not consist of avoiding suffering or idealizing joy. It implies, first and foremost, a willingness to listen. Listening not in the passive sense, but as an act of radical attention to that which has been buried by the demands of others, unconscious repetitions, and narratives that one has accepted without having chosen them. As Søren Kierkegaard points out, truth is not imposed from outside; it is appropriated through existential internalization. Authenticity, then, is not equivalent to arbitrary self-assertion. It is a form of responsibility to what has been clearly and lucidly recognized as true.
In a historical context marked by acceleration, simulation, and the imperative of visibility, choosing an authentic life is an act of resistance. It is not a matter of ideological opposition, but of silent fidelity to a truth that does not need to be justified. Rejecting prefabricated scripts requires the courage to declare, “This does not represent me.” But it also requires accepting, “This commits me, even if it makes me uncomfortable.” As Friedrich Nietzsche wrote, “He who has a why to live can bear almost any how.” However, that why is not inherited: it must be discovered and chosen or elected. Meaning is not achieved like solving an equation. It is cultivated, as Zen master Dōgen observes, in the way one walks, eats, speaks, and works. It does not require heroic gestures. It dwells in consistency without witnesses, in words that do not betray, in silent decisions. In this mode of presence, time ceases to push forward. It begins to unfold as a livable space. Heidegger put it precisely: it is not a matter of occupying time, but of “dwelling” in it from being.
Authenticity is not about being right or obtaining external validation. It is about reconciling oneself with what one has become. It is not about belonging to all environments, but about finding a place where it is not necessary to pretend. Laozi teaches that “the wise man does not show off, and therefore shines; he does not justify himself, and therefore convinces.” Authenticity does not seek applause. It generates silence. And in a world saturated with noise, that silence is the unmistakable sign of a presence that does not need to impose itself.
Seeking meaning is not a luxury reserved for exceptional moments. It is a structural necessity of existence. Living authentically is not an occasional privilege. It is a constant demand. It requires decision, renunciation, and vigilance. And when you fail, start again. And when you lose your direction, stop. Sometimes, it is enough to stop running away from silence to begin to see. As Simone Weil said, “Attention, taken in its highest sense, is the purest form of generosity.”
And then, without artifice or effort, life begins to reflect soberly who one is. And in that discreet correspondence between being and living, time ceases to be a race. It becomes a dwelling place."

Prabhuji

"I do not accept ideologies, whatever ‘ism’ they may be and whatever they may be called, because any thought that is con...
05/21/2025

"I do not accept ideologies, whatever ‘ism’ they may be and whatever they may be called, because any thought that is confined to a doctrinal system abdicates its most demanding task: to understand without distorting and to judge without resorting to automatic patterns. All ideology operates through a conceptual reductionism that impoverishes the complexity of reality. In its quest for coherence, it simplifies the multiple and eliminates what does not fit into its pre-existing categories. Isaiah Berlin observed that closed systems of ideas sacrifice the plurality of human values for the sake of artificial consistency, which limits the capacity for discernment and restricts open-mindedness.
This impoverishment is accompanied by a normative dogmatism that presents its principles as self-evident truths, thus closing off any possibility of critical review. Karl Popper argued that falsifiability is the criterion that distinguishes rational knowledge from dogma. Similarly, thought that renounces the possibility of being refuted ceases to be thought and becomes doctrine.
Ideology does not describe the world: it shapes it discursively to generate adherence. Its use of language responds to a strategic rather than a cognitive function. Confucius already warned in the Lún Yǔ:

“If names are not correct, language is not adequate; if language is not adequate, actions are not carried out.”

Semantic manipulation not only corrupts discourse, it also distorts the action that derives from it.
All ideology eliminates singularity in favor of categories that are functional to the collective narrative. No individual can be reduced to an identity assigned by their position in a narrative system. Emmanuel Levinas asserted that the other cannot be understood as part of a whole, since their otherness transcends any conceptual structure. A similar insight is found in the Dhammapada:

“No being is identical to another; each must walk their own path.”

By subordinating the individual to an abstraction, ideology erases their concrete uniqueness. Added to this is the inhibition of self-criticism. Every ideological “ism” contains mechanisms that neutralize internal examination and exclude dissent. Michel Foucault showed how regimes of truth are intertwined with structures of power that legitimize certain discourses and silence others. In such an environment, thought is not questioned: it is reproduced. Ideology is not born of the desire to understand, but of the will to influence. Its purpose is not knowledge, but effectiveness. This subordination of thought to extra-theatrical ends betrays its original vocation. Nagarjuna, from the Madhyamaka philosophy, warned that “wisdom is not directed at an object or a utility; its nature is the emptiness of clinging.” Thinking implies stripping oneself of all self-interested uses of knowledge.
I do not reject ideologies out of moral neutrality, but out of fidelity to a more demanding form of rationality. Philosophy begins where dogma ends, not because it offers greater certainties, but because it keeps questions open. Therefore, instead of adhering to closed systems, I cultivate a questioning attitude, conscious, as Socrates pointed out, that “I only know that I know nothing,” and convinced, with Zhuangzi, that “the wise man is not attached to any form, for all forms are transitory.”

Prabhuji

“Life is not an object; it is a process. It is not ”something" that can be possessed, nor is it a goal to be achieved. I...
05/21/2025

“Life is not an object; it is a process. It is not ”something" that can be possessed, nor is it a goal to be achieved. It does not present itself as a fixed point on the horizon of existence, nor as an achievement attainable through will or calculation. Life manifests itself in the flow of time, moment by moment, like a flower that opens without witnesses, like a sky that requires no interpretation. To try to capture it or take possession of it is to exclude oneself from its unfolding.
The meaning of life is not achieved through effort. Effort can refine the ego, discipline it, or make it more functional within a given normative framework. It can construct a more acceptable or effective image of the subject. But it does not lead to the essential. What transcends—whether conceived as fulfillment, consciousness, divinity, or revelation—is not conquered, not obtained: it is received. It only appears when the tension to achieve it ceases. It is not the result of will, but the effect of an opening.
From this perspective, the attitude promoted by the Zen tradition is based on suspending all internal compulsion. It is not a renunciation understood as resignation, but a lucid surrender to the present. It is not the renunciation of the defeated but the surrender of the lover. There is no need to ascend, overcome, improve or conquer. It is enough to simply be. The here and now, when inhabited without expectation, without projection or desire for change, are enough. Inhabiting the moment only requires observation. It is not about correcting or judging. Authentic observation does not produce judgments or classifications. It does not determine what is good or bad. Judging interrupts the gaze, turning experience into interpretation. Instead, the witness remains: contemplating without appropriation, without interference, without intention. Observing as the sky observes the clouds. This form of undirected attention—unattached to purpose, free of moralism—generates a silent clarity. From this lucidity arises an understanding that does not aspire to change the world, but to inhabit it. In this understanding, the ordinary reveals itself as truly extraordinary. Eating, walking, talking, drinking, breathing, or looking are not means to achieve something else: they are the place where totality unfolds. There is no other state to reach. What is presented, as it is, is enough. It is not necessary to transform oneself into something else. It is not necessary to reach a higher state. The subject, in its present form, is whole. There is no urgency. There is no demand. The desire to construct a complex spirituality through techniques and methods is nothing more than a form of evasion. The essential is not found elsewhere: it is already here.
Therefore, it is enough to stop. To breathe. And allow the door to open.
Because it has never been closed."

Prabhuji

"Meditation does not admit gradations, scales, or hierarchical categories. It is not a sequential process or a step-by-s...
05/20/2025

"Meditation does not admit gradations, scales, or hierarchical categories. It is not a sequential process or a step-by-step ascent, as if climbing rungs on a linear ladder. Its unfolding does not respond to a quantifiable progression, since its essential core—enlightenment—cannot be measured. Its presence cannot be measured out: either it has been revealed, or it remains absent. Its quality is absolute, not relative. A single clear vision is enough to radically alter the structure of consciousness, just as a spark is enough to consume the night, or a drop can contain the form of the ocean. However, although enlightenment is not fragmented into degrees, it can mature over time. The initial light does not increase by accumulation, but it can spread, pe*****te more delicately, reach areas of being not yet integrated. This expansion does not imply a transformation of the essence, but a deepening of its radiance. Like wine, whose substance remains constant but gains body, density, and harmony with age, consciousness also acquires texture, stability, and depth as the state of presence becomes more consolidated. The parallel is eloquent. Newly made wine is authentic. It is already wine. It does not need to prove anything to be legitimate. But wine that has been left to rest in silence, without alteration or haste, acquires an internal complexity that distinguishes it. Its aroma becomes more subtle, its impact more lasting, its presence more rounded. Nothing is added to it: everything has emerged from what it already was, but without interference. In the same way, meditation, once it has taken place, is complete in itself. It does not need to develop to be valid. However, when it is intertwined with everyday actions, when it pe*****tes language, perception, and breathing, it becomes more stable, more silent, more real. Not as a result of a voluntary action, but because the subject has learned not to obstruct it.
Time does not create it, but it can clarify its presence. Comparison and judgment are frequent obstacles on this path. Measuring experience, competing with others, or seeking inner recognition is tantamount to abandoning the very essence of the practice. To meditate is to be. To be with increasing simplicity.
Being with increasing totality. Everything else—understanding, stillness, discernment—arises unforced, like fruit ripening or rain falling: without calculation, without will to dominate, without haste.
Enlightenment is not cultivated by accumulation nor achieved by effort. It is allowed. It does not require perfection, it requires availability. Where the mind ceases its inertia, and where the heart stops searching, the essential unfolds naturally. What should concern us is not reaching a higher state, but learning to remain available. Because in the silence of that availability, truth finds space to reveal itself in fullness."

Prabhuji

"La meditación no admite gradaciones, escalas ni categorías jerárquicas. No es un proceso secuencial ni una ascensión po...
05/20/2025

"La meditación no admite gradaciones, escalas ni categorías jerárquicas. No es un proceso secuencial ni una ascensión por etapas, como si se tratara de subir peldaños en una estructura lineal. Su despliegue no responde a una progresión cuantificable, ya que su núcleo esencial —la iluminación— no admite medida alguna. Su presencia no puede ser dosificada: o se ha revelado, o permanece ausente. Su cualidad es absoluta, no relativa. Una sola visión clara basta para alterar radicalmente la estructura de la conciencia, del mismo modo en que una chispa basta para consumir la noche, o una gota puede contener la forma del océano. No obstante, aunque la iluminación no se fragmenta en grados, puede madurar en el tiempo. La luz inicial no se incrementa por acumulación, pero puede extenderse, penetrar con mayor delicadeza, alcanzar zonas del ser aún no integradas. Esta expansión no implica transformación de la esencia, sino profundización de su irradiación. Como el vino, cuya sustancia permanece constante, pero que gana cuerpo, densidad y armonía con los años, la conciencia también adquiere textura, estabilidad y profundidad a medida que el estado de presencia se consolida. El paralelismo es elocuente. El vino recién elaborado es auténtico. Ya es vino. No necesita probar nada para ser legítimo. Pero el que ha reposado en silencio, sin alteración ni apuro, adquiere una complejidad interna que lo distingue. Su aroma se hace más sutil, su impacto más duradero, su presencia más redonda. No se le añade nada: todo ha emergido desde lo que ya era, pero sin interferencias. Del mismo modo, la meditación, una vez acontecida, se halla completa en sí misma. No necesita desarrollarse para validarse. Sin embargo, cuando se entrelaza con los actos cotidianos, cuando penetra el lenguaje, la percepción, la respiración, se vuelve más estable, más silenciosa, más real. No como resultado de una acción voluntaria, sino porque el sujeto ha aprendido a no obstruirla. El tiempo no la crea, pero sí puede clarificar su presencia.
La comparación y el juicio son obstáculos frecuentes en este camino. Medir la experiencia, competir con otros, o buscar reconocimientos interiores equivale a abandonar la esencia misma de la práctica. Meditar es estar. Estar cada vez con mayor simplicidad. Estar cada vez con más totalidad. Todo lo demás —comprensión, quietud, discernimiento— surge de forma no forzada, como maduran los frutos o cae la lluvia: sin cálculo, sin voluntad de dominio, sin prisa.
La iluminación no se cultiva por acumulación ni se alcanza por esfuerzo. Se permite. No requiere perfección, requiere disponibilidad. Allí donde la mente cesa su inercia, y donde el corazón deja de buscar, lo esencial se despliega con naturalidad. Lo que debe preocuparnos no es alcanzar un estado superior, sino aprender a permanecer disponibles. Porque en el silencio de esa disponibilidad, la verdad encuentra espacio para revelarse en plenitud."

Prabhuji

"The bond between men and women cannot be properly understood if it is reduced to emotional factors, cultural conditioni...
05/20/2025

"The bond between men and women cannot be properly understood if it is reduced to emotional factors, cultural conditioning, or functional patterns. At its root, it refers to an ontological structure from which human beings are constituted as living relationships. Such a relationship is not generated by aggregation, nor is it explained by utility. Rather, it manifests a fundamental openness to otherness, inscribed in the very condition of being a person.
Edith Stein warned that sexual difference does not imply opposition or hierarchy. It represents a concrete manifestation of the mutual gift that shapes the relational vocation of the person. From this perspective, the masculine and the feminine are not sociological categories, but integrated dimensions of the act of personal being, which only attain their truth in relationship.
Martin Buber conceived this structure as a dialogical event in which the self is constituted in relation to an irreducible you. Authentic encounter does not seek to absorb or reflect the other, but to welcome them in their unique presence.
Emmanuel Levinas developed this intuition by pointing out that the other does not present itself as an object of knowledge, but as a face that challenges and summons. This ethical demand precedes all theoretical elaboration, and its origin cannot be thematized without betraying its meaning. Meditation, understood as a way of life ordered toward interiority, allows for a non-instrumental openness to this presence.
Loving without lucid attention degenerates into repetition and conflict. Meditating without loving openness leads to sterile confinement. Only in the convergence of both dimensions is a fruitful reciprocity configured, where each preserves their uniqueness without closing themselves off to the other. There is no symbiosis or subordination. There is welcome.
Xavier Zubiri, from a phenomenology of affect, affirmed that human beings are not subjects facing objects, but realities that are affected by other realities in their being. The other does not appear as data or representation, but as a presence that imposes itself in its own way of being. In the relationship between man and woman, this manifestation takes on a particular intensity: it simultaneously involves the body, language, desire, and meaning.
The unity thus conceived does not respond to an ideal of fusion or an attempt at domination. It takes shape as an existential anticipation of a reconciled way of living. The other no longer appears as an obstacle or a mirror, but as a silent witness to a truth that is not elaborated, but revealed. This type of communion cannot be improvised. It requires sustained silence, ethical attention, and fidelity to the center from which being offers itself.
When love is embodied in lucidity, and meditation opens itself to concrete otherness, a form of communion emerges that is not based on time or necessity, but on the shared recognition of a truth that precedes both. This truth is not the property of anyone, but can be found in unity that respects difference. Where this unity occurs, a higher form of humanity is revealed, defined not by the affirmation of the self, but by the willingness to be transformed in relationship."

Prabhuji

"There is no need to rush the process or anticipate its outcome. The essential is already within you. You are not incomp...
05/19/2025

"There is no need to rush the process or anticipate its outcome. The essential is already within you. You are not incomplete: you are potential waiting to be realized, not a deficit to be corrected. The seed does not design the tree it will become. Its entire future morphology—leaves, flowers, fruits—is contained in its original architecture. It does not project: it allows the unfolding to happen. Likewise, human beings do not construct their destiny through individual will, but rather accompany a direction inherent in their most intimate structure. They do not need external intervention, but rather internal conditions that favor development: sustained attention, watchful silence, non-reactive receptivity. Organic growth does not obey commands or require instructions: it emerges from within if the environment allows it. Attempting to guide the process of individuation through closed doctrines or prescriptive rituals interferes with its flow. It introduces dissonance between what is implied and what is imposed. It fragments the continuity of becoming. Consciousness cannot expand if it is subjected to fixed forms. It is the ratio universalis—not private intention—that legitimately guides us. As the Stoics affirmed, the logos spermatikós structures from within, without violence.
Human beings are not born as finished, complete entities. They are an opening, an ontological orientation in progress. At their core lies a tendency that aspires to a mode of existence beyond the restrictions of the egoic nature. This transformation does not require inherited beliefs or imposed renunciations. It does not demand external regulations or institutional validation. It requires a willingness to let this internal dynamic act without interruption.
Any demand for guarantees prevents transition. If the seed needed certainty before breaking its shell, it would remain inert. If the bird avoided leaving the egg for fear of the unknown, it would remain motionless. Growth is incompatible with the search for absolute security. It requires exposure to risk, passage through uncertainty, renunciation of the known. Transformation implies vulnerability, but without it, no expansion is possible. Those who wait for infallible promises become paralyzed. The only authentic certainty is the possibility that dwells within you. To be realized, this potential requires deliberate openness and suspension of control.

ὁ δὲ θεὸς παιδὶ ἐοικώς, παίζων πεσσεύων· παιδὸς ἡ βασιληίη.

“God is like a child playing dice; sovereignty belongs to the child.”

(Heraclitus, fr. DK 52)

The divine does not act as the engineer of a predetermined order. It does not execute a plan or impose an external purpose. It behaves like a free player who creates without calculation. Heraclitus introduces here an image that destabilizes all metaphysics of predictability: the sacred operates without rigidity, through a structuring spontaneity that needs no justification.
Entering into this logic requires abandoning the pretense of mastery and assuming a lucid surrender. Remaining attached to the shell of personal convictions prevents flight. Freedom does not emerge from control, but from trust in an orientation vaster than the autonomous self.

Ἐγγὺς ἐστὶν ὁ λόγος, ὁν ἀνθρώποι διατελοῦσιν ἀγνοοῦντες.

“The Logos is near, but men continually ignore it.”

(Heraclitus, fr. DK 72)

Truth is neither distant nor inaccessible. It dwells in immediacy, but becomes indiscernible when proof is demanded, when prior certainty is desired. The accumulation of knowledge does not guarantee access. Openness, on the other hand, does make it possible. Only those who abandon resistance mature. Only those who yield to this silent dynamic attain a broader state of being.
No agonizing effort or compulsive asceticism is required. It is enough to allow that original structure to express itself without interference. Transformation does not come from voluntaristic imposition, but from lucid consent. It is not achieved through confrontation, but through availability. Nature is sufficient. Trust in it's knowledge.

Prabhuji

"In certain states of meditative contemplation, the impulse to withdraw from the world emerges. This movement does not e...
05/19/2025

"In certain states of meditative contemplation, the impulse to withdraw from the world emerges. This movement does not express escape, but rather the need to confront one's own consciousness without external interference. The inclination toward solitude is not a mistake. It is misleading to interpret it as a rejection of others or as a sign of opposition between connection and interiority. Radical autonomy has no basis. Subjectivity is always constituted in reference to others: we are born into a community, we share symbolic systems, and we participate in interpersonal emotional networks.
Martin Buber argues that the “I” is only constituted in the encounter with a “you.” The subject is not a closed monad, but a node of relationships that takes on meaning in reciprocity (cf. Ich und Du, 1923).
Internalization does not require the breaking of ties. Voluntary isolation is not a condition for self-knowledge. It is not necessary to exclude the other, but rather to silence the ego's pretensions.
For Jean-Luc Marion, the subject is not a source of giving, but a receptacle for the gift that exceeds him. In the experience of love and contemplation, an ontological passivity of the self is revealed (Étant donné, 1997).
Those who reach a certain existential maturity understand that inner life and openness to others are not mutually exclusive spheres. Both can coexist without cancellation or fusion. Withdrawing from the world under the guise of introspection can become a form of evasion. Similarly, diluting oneself in exteriority without reflexivity leads to a loss of self. Integrating interiority and relationship requires the decentering of the self. Shared life is not opposed to authenticity. Joy does not come from isolation, but from the cessation of self-imposed identity demands.
Nishida Kitarō develops, from the Zen tradition, the notion of “the self as a place of negation,” where the self is not substance, but a function of a radical openness to the other and to nothingness (Zettai mujunteki jikodōitsu, 1932).
Serenity does not require constant reaffirmation of the self. It appears when the need to justify oneself to others or to maintain a defined image of oneself ceases.
It is not the world that must be abandoned, but the narcissistic representation of a self split from the whole. Once this fiction is overcome, reality unfolds as ontological communion.
In such a state, meditation and love are not mutually exclusive. By losing their compulsive nature, both practices reveal a structural unity that transcends all possessive or defensive logic of the self.

Prabhuji

"There is a loneliness that comes from heartbreak, emptiness, distance, loss, absence, or abandonment. But there is anot...
05/19/2025

"There is a loneliness that comes from heartbreak, emptiness, distance, loss, absence, or abandonment. But there is another, more subtle and paradoxical kind that arises at the very heart of true love. One can be deeply in love and still experience a loneliness that is not a lack, but a fulfillment. This loneliness is not the absence of another, but the presence of oneself.
When love reaches a certain depth, it does not become fusion or possession. It transforms into a wide, silent, and living space where the soul can inhabit itself without fear, without noise, and without escape. It is then that one discovers that the most genuine love does not nullify individuality, but rather reveals and sustains it. Authentic love is not a chain or a perpetual promise of companionship. It is a deep ocean surrounding the island that we are. The waves of the other's presence come and go, touch our shores, bathe us, invite us. But they do not drag us away, they do not flood us, they do not nullify us, they do not destroy us. The deeper that sea of love is, the more solid our island becomes. The more firmly rooted we are in being.
True love is not self-forgetfulness, it is rediscovery. It does not ask us to disappear for the other, but to appear in our fullness. It gives us the opportunity to be with the other without ceasing to be with ourselves. It teaches us that only those who know how to be with themselves, without fear and without haste, can truly love without losing themselves. The value of love is not that it distracts us from our loneliness, but that it illuminates it. It offers us the possibility of being seen without ceasing to see ourselves. Of supporting the other without losing our inner balance. Of walking together without blurring our footprints.
That is why, in the most profound and sincere moments of love, an intense, silent, almost sacred loneliness can arise. Not because of the absence of the other, but because in their presence, one returns to oneself with greater clarity. Love, then, is not a refuge from emptiness, but a place where one's own silence is appreciated, where the soul can rest without hiding. And it is precisely this solitude that makes love valuable. Because those who have found in love the space to return to themselves have found the only bond that does not imprison: the one that accompanies without invading, that remains without possessing, that touches without breaking.
When love is true, it does not fill a void, it opens up a world. And in that world, everyone can be themselves, whole and free, under the same shared sky.

Prabhuji

Address

Jamaica, NY

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Avadhutashram posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Avadhutashram:

Shortcuts

Share

Category