Presbyterians Protecting Life

Presbyterians Protecting Life Equipping YOU to champion life! Compelled by the gospel, PPL equips Presbyterians to champion human life at every stage.

"Whenever the subject of abortions late in pregnancy comes up, supporters of it fall back on the same fictions. It’s sup...
08/15/2026

"Whenever the subject of abortions late in pregnancy comes up, supporters of it fall back on the same fictions. It’s supposedly rare and happens only when the pregnancy poses severe physical risks to the mother or the baby has severe abnormalities incompatible with life." Read for the truth about late-term abortions and what drives them.

What, after all, was the problem the new law was enacted to address?

"Were they offered medical interventions aside from death? What information were they given about the dire medical circu...
08/13/2026

"Were they offered medical interventions aside from death? What information were they given about the dire medical circumstances? Was that information biased in favor of euthanasia? Were the parents bullied into the death decision by ghoulish doctors who enthusiastically cheer on euthanasia for kids? ... Now, a child in dire need of supportive medical care, comfort and love is no more."

New York’s pro-death community must have celebrated Wednesday when the state’s Medical Aid in Dying law kicked in.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1BFVMHKXnn/
08/13/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1BFVMHKXnn/

The state of Massachusetts has enacted a radical abortion law that allows for a baby to be killed up until the moment of birth. Thanks to the Prioritizing Patient Care Act, medical personnel are legally protected to abort babies beyond 24 weeks gestation upon request.

Governor Maura Healey (D) signed the bill so that every woman in the state can have the “right” to an abortion. “Under prior law, some Massachusetts patients were forced to leave the state to receive care,” according to a press release from Healey’s office.

Healey hosted a press conference on Monday, surrounded by a group of joyful women as she made the announcement that will undoubtedly lead to the death of more children. “Abortion is healthcare” read the sign hung on the podium Healey spoke from. Massachusetts is the tenth state to allow abortion up to birth.

“It’s incomprehensible that even a staunch abortion activist could justify an abortion law as extreme as this one,” Joy Stockbauer, policy analyst for the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand.

Healey vowed that Massachusetts would continue to be a leader in promoting the radical agenda: “And as governor, I promise that no matter what Donald Trump or Republicans in Congress or the Supreme Court does, we’re going to continue to make sure that women and families have access to the health care that they need, right here in Massachusetts,” she pledged.

Stockbauer pointed out that the Bay State already has extremist policies when it comes to abortion.

“Massachusetts already had exceptions on the books to allow abortions based on the physical or mental health of the mother, though there is no situation when an abortion is medically necessary. This new law expands abortion so that a mother doesn’t even need a reason to kill her child — she can have her fully formed, birth-ready child killed in her womb simply because she feels like it. Abortion activists will say that no one has an abortion in the third trimester unless they medically need to. This law exposes that claim for the farce that it is.”

Healey’s press release said that Massachusetts law will reflect the belief that “health care decisions should be made between women and their doctors.”

“That was the argument,” said Dr. Albert Mohler, president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary on his podcast, “The Briefing,” referring to Healey’s line of reasoning. “[But] we just need to note that she [Healey] goes on saying that the justification for this is that there are prenatal, pre-birth diagnoses that are medically devastating that should allow women to terminate a pregnancy.”

Mohler continued that the law opens the floodgates for on-demand abortion.

“You have conditions that are diagnosed late after 24 weeks of pregnancy, and women are deciding on the basis of that fetal diagnosis. They want to go and have an abortion now. We have to say, morally, there are some diagnoses that indicate that the pregnancy itself might not end in a live birth. But the point is here that even as Governor Healy and others claim that as the moral justification, the moral effect goes far beyond this.”

Doctors say that babies born as early as 22 weeks have the capacity to survive with proper care.

“By the third trimester, a mother has been feeling her baby kick and squirm for months. If she shined a flashlight at her belly, the baby may poke that spot in response, which is a favorite game I used to play with my little boy before he was born,” Stockbauer shared. “Let’s be clear on what this abortion law means for Massachusetts: children will be killed on what could have been their birthdays.”

The bill is scheduled to take effect in 90 days.

𝑊𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑛 𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟. 𝑃𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑.

Pray for our friends in South Carolina who mourn this loss of an honorable national leader for life, and a loving big br...
07/13/2026

Pray for our friends in South Carolina who mourn this loss of an honorable national leader for life, and a loving big brother to a sister bereaved of parents.

National Right to Life mourns the sudden passing of Senator Lindsey Graham, a steadfast friend of unborn children and their mothers. His leadership on the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act and the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act gave a voice to children who could not speak for themselves. We honor his years of service and his commitment to protecting innocent human life. We extend our deepest condolences to his family, friends, staff, and the people of South Carolina. May he rest in peace.

"Surely, if the judgment upon those who lead a child astray is as harsh as the millstone lesson Jesus gave (Matthew 18:6...
07/03/2026

"Surely, if the judgment upon those who lead a child astray is as harsh as the millstone lesson Jesus gave (Matthew 18:6), then ponder how marvelous the blessing of helping a young person care about the unborn?" Read more from "The Covenant Nurture of Youth" by Rev. John Hopkins on our blogsite:
(Pexels photo- chris f.)

06/22/2026

One of the greatest spectacles of our times is upon us. The thrill we have all had to wait for four years to relive: The World Cup is on. And I can’t wait to get home this week to live it out with my grandkids for the next month. I grew up of Catalan descent, […]

Wow
06/11/2026

Wow

𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏’𝐒 𝐇𝐇𝐒 𝐃𝐄𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐄𝐒 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐙𝐄𝐍 𝐄𝐌𝐁𝐑𝐘𝐎𝐒 𝐀𝐑𝐄 ‘𝐇𝐔𝐌𝐀𝐍 𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐑𝐄𝐍 𝐃𝐄𝐒𝐄𝐑𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐓𝐎 𝐁𝐄 𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐍’ — 𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐒 𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐃𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐌

More than 1 million embryos created through IVF currently sit frozen in American clinics — many destined to be discarded, donated to destructive experiments, or matched with same-sex couples through a process the Biden administration quietly built to exclude faith-based families. The Trump administration just rewrote the rules.

HHS’s Office of Population Affairs this week issued a revised Notice of Funding Opportunity for the Embryo Adoption Awareness and Services program — a grant program that has existed since 2002. The 2026 NOFO is unambiguous: frozen embryos must be treated as “𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐲.” Those eight words represent a complete policy reversal from the Biden era.

Federal grant funds are now explicitly 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐫𝐲𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, from donating embryos to embryo-destructive research, and from creating new embryos solely for experimentation. Agencies receiving federal dollars must conduct background checks, home visits, and post-placement supervision — and provide open or identified donation so the child can eventually know their biological origins. A senior HHS official told the Daily Signal that recipients must now consider 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥. Under Biden, adult preferences were the governing framework.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐡𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐁𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧. His administration awarded all grants to three secular agencies that matched embryos with same-sex couples, cutting faith-based organizations — the backbone of embryo adoption in America — out entirely. Trump’s 2026 NOFO restores them as integral partners.

Emma Waters, a family policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation focused on reproductive biotechnology, called the revision 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦. Neel Upadhye, founder of Frozen Orphans, said it is 𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘺𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭, 𝘷𝘪𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘩. The program has existed since 2002. The child-protective language and the faith-based restoration are new to this year’s NOFO.

Trump campaigned as the “father of IVF” — a claim that raised pro-life eyebrows. This is his administration’s first move confronting IVF’s hard reality: over a million embryos in frozen storage, most facing destruction or indefinite limbo. He didn’t end IVF. He demanded it treat its children as human beings.

𝐁𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐥𝐮𝐬. 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧.

"In pursuit of privacy and autonomy, removal of in-person dispensing requirements has left women isolated and without th...
06/09/2026

"In pursuit of privacy and autonomy, removal of in-person dispensing requirements has left women isolated and without the patient-doctor relationship, and all the safeguards that provides. When abortion pills are made available online and attainable outside this professional relationship of support, there is no standard of care for the use of this drug. Women are left without knowledge of normal or abnormal side effects, which can lead to disastrous consequences."

Government systems should be designed with care in mind, not weaponized to harm abortion-vulnerable women.

Embracing suffering with true dignity and grace.
06/04/2026

Embracing suffering with true dignity and grace.

Former U.S. Senator and University of Florida president Ben Sasse is facing terminal Stage 4 pancreatic cancer, but his response is drawing attention for its deep Christian faith and hope.

In a reflection on Sasse’s diagnosis, Jim Towey wrote that Sasse views death not as something to fear or control, but as a journey to be lived with dignity, purpose, and trust in God. Towey emphasized that “death and dying aren’t the same,” noting that the process of dying still holds meaning and value.

As debates over assisted su***de continue across the United States, Sasse’s example is being highlighted as a reminder that even in suffering, life remains precious. His witness points to a Christian hope rooted not in escaping pain, but in trusting God through it and looking forward to eternity.

Image: Facebook/SenatorSasse

Read and pray for adding your voice to the need to awaken America to what other nations can attest to and now regret.
06/02/2026

Read and pray for adding your voice to the need to awaken America to what other nations can attest to and now regret.

The Slippery Slope Keeps Slipping

Back in April, a reckless assisted su***de bill looked like it was going to pass and be made British law. Instead, it was shut down by the House of Lords. Then, in May, the Irish parliament rejected an expanded abortion bill by a vote of 85-30. On this side of the Atlantic, things are headed in the opposite direction.

Like all such “mercy” killing laws, Canada’s MAiD was promised as an option only for those facing imminent death and who could consent. Things are long past that and will likely go even further. Recently, a Quebec physician suggested that the nation’s already draconian MAiD program be expanded to include babies. In response, Brandan Tran of Canada’s Campaign Life Coalition said:

“Canadian law currently permits the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for critically ill newborns. This medical practitioner’s proposal goes further. He calls for the calculated killing of an infant. These are patients, babies, who cannot speak, cannot consent, and cannot ask for help. If we cannot draw the line here, I am not sure where medical professionals imagine the line to be.”

Physician-assisted su***de is always sold to the public as a “compassionate” measure, necessary to spare those with no reasonable chance of recovery from unbearable pain and suffering during the last days of their lives. In every context in which it has been made legal, however, assisted su***de has never remained limited to the rare instances for which it was sold.

There are reasons this slope has proven so slippery everywhere it has been made legal. Once it’s decided that certain lives are not worth living, the list of people eligible for assisted su***de inevitably grows. It becomes easier to re-evaluate lives based on some criteria other than intrinsic value, such as convenience or financial costs. It’s a small step indeed from “eligible to die” to “expected to die.”

That’s why, wherever physician-assisted su***de has been legalized, it happens by a series of bait-and-switch claims to the public. “Terminal” illness is often expanded to include “chronic” illnesses and permanent disabilities. In Belgium, the Netherlands, and Canada, even mental illness and depression are considered sufficient justification for su***de. Given this trajectory, it’s only a matter of time before the requirement of an actual illness is dispensed with.

For example, the original promise was that only those certifiably in their right minds could be euthanized. But that was always a lie. Anyone who goes into an American emergency department claiming they want to die would be diagnosed with “suicidal ideation,” admitted, and put on a psych hold. To not do so, in fact, would be medical malpractice. Suicidal ideation is rightly regarded as a symptom of an underlying mental disorder. People with untreated mental illnesses are not allowed to make life-and-death decisions.

Or at least they weren’t. In Oregon, for example, since physician-assisted su***de was legalized, over 96% of people given lethal drugs did not undergo a psychiatric evaluation. This is why, as a “What Would You Say” video on the topic so clearly explained, there’s nothing compassionate about physician-assisted su***de. In fact, it is the exact opposite of compassion, the abdication of a civilized society’s responsibility to offer care to those who need it most when they need it most.

In his book The Thanatos Syndrome, Walker Percy described how a society devolves to the point of thinking that killing patients instead of healing them is compassion. A psychiatrist, Percy wrote of well-trained and exquisitely credentialed doctors who “turn their backs on the oath of Hippocrates and kill millions of old useless people, unborn children, born malformed children, for the good of mankind.” What Percy wrote in 1987 has become reality. Some form of assisted su***de is now legal in 13 states and the District of Columbia.

Like abortion, the legal fight against assisted su***de is only part of the battle. It must become unthinkable to strip away the intrinsic and indelible dignity every human possesses, no matter their life condition. Otherwise, there is no way to stop from sliding down a slope so slippery.

This Breakpoint was co-authored with Roberto Rivera and Dr. Timothy Padgett.

Address

P. O. Box 199061
Indianapolis, IN
46219

Telephone

+13174344558

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Presbyterians Protecting Life posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Presbyterians Protecting Life:

Shortcuts

Share