What Does The Bible Say?

What Does The Bible Say? Extensive examination of the Scriptures concerning Biblical Truths and Doctrines.

12/04/2024

-A biblical exegesis of (1 Cor. 14)-

What, Who, When, How, and Why…Simple questions that reinforce a biblical understanding of the Gift of the Holy Spirit.
10/20/2024

What, Who, When, How, and Why…

Simple questions that reinforce a biblical understanding of the Gift of the Holy Spirit.

09/08/2024

📖A Biblical Exegesis of Colossians 2:9)📝

The text reads- “For in him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily." Many people of the Oneness persuasion contend that this text teaches that Jesus is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. They define “Godhead” as meaning (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit).

Q: Does this text say or imply that Jesus is the Father and the Holy Spirit? No. The text simply reads that the fullness of deity (Theotetos) dwells in Christ bodily. Christ is "fully God" incarnate (John 1:14). The Son is not ⅓ God, and the Father ⅓ God, and the Holy Spirit ⅓ God. The Father is fully God, The Son is fully God and the Holy Spirit is fully God. Therefore, the Son (Who fully possesses the deity of God) was incarnated - thus, the fullness of deity bodily.

Again, we must note the categorical distinction between "being" and "person."

This text is a reference to "deity" not personage. This text is equivalent to saying (in regard to man) - "In John Doe dwells all the fullness of humanity." Does this imply that humanity is one man (i.e. John Doe) or does it imply that John Doe is fully human? This would actually refute the Oneness position seeing that it attributes deity to the Son of God. It would harmonize with (John 1:1, 1:14) - The Word (who is God) was incarnated. The text is actually declaring that the Son is FULLY GOD (deity).

09/06/2024

Church tonight at Word of TruthHoliness Church. All are welcome, service starts at 7:00pm.

09/05/2024

In the record of (1 John 4:1-3) we read- “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” The statement - “Jesus Christ is come in the flesh” begs the necessary question: Where did He come from? Scripture makes it abundantly clear that the Son “came from heaven” into the world (John 3:13, 6:33-35, 6:38). Christ, the Son Himself declares that a body of flesh was prepared for Him (Heb. 10:5-7). Note, Christ says this to the Father “as He is coming into the world” thus, showing a conversation between Father and Son BEFORE the act of the incarnation itself. This clearly advocates for the literal pre-existence of the Son. Such literal existence is denied by those who adhere to the Oneness persuasion.

Those of the “oneness” persuasion are being influenced by an antichrist spirit. Oneness adherents do not believe that the Son “came in the flesh.” It is stated numerous times in their literature that the Son was merely a “thought, plan, or idea” in the mind of the Father prior to the incarnation. So according to the oneness persuasion, the Son did not have any real or substantial existence before His birth in Bethlehem. They (those of the oneness persuasion) insist that the Father came in the flesh and that the “Son” was nothing more than a body that the Father prepared for His own self. Yet that is not what we find on the pages of the Bible ANYWHERE. John is very clear when he records the words - “And we have seen and do testify that the Father SENT THE SON to be the Savior of the world” (1 John 4:14). Whereas, those of the oneness persuasion would contend that the Father “sent Himself.” John also records in a very plain manner who it was that was manifested in flesh- (1 John 3:8)- “…the Son of God was manifested…”

Logically and from the plain reading of scripture, in order for the Son to be “manifest” in the flesh (come in the flesh), it would necessitate the Son’s existence (literally) before taking on the flesh that He assumed at the incarnation. This is what we find in the record of (1 John 4), and those who reject this record are noted as being under the persuasion of the antichrist.

08/29/2024

There are many irrational misinterpretations of scripture within the Oneness Apostolic (Jesus name) persuasion. One of the very common textual misinterpretations is (John 5:43). The text reads - “I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, you will receive him.”

Those of the “Oneness” persuasion would contend that the Father’s name is (Jesus) based upon the fact that Jesus has “come in His Father’s name.” Let’s test this interpretation in light of (1 Samuel 17:45) in which David uses the same grammatical construction “… I come to you in the name of the LORD” (or, “in the LORD’S name). Q: Does this mean that the Lord’s name is “David?” Of course not.

There is a meaning in regard to the phrase “in the name of” as it is a reference to authority. Christ, The Son, came in the authority of His Father (John 5:43). The Father being a witness of the Son (John 5:37) in which Jesus says - “And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.” Very clearly showing the distinction of the Father and the Son. (John 8:17) Christ states - “Even in your Law it has been written that the testimony of two people is true. I am He who testifies about Myself, and the Father who sent Me testifies about Me.” Christ very honestly uses plain grammar that show very clear distinction between the Father and Himself. If Jesus was wanting to (in some secret fashion) tell us that He is the Father, then this is not the grammar He would have used. Rather, Christ is showing that the Father is one person (who bears witness of the Son), and He (Christ, the Son) is another person who bears witness of Himself.

The name “Jesus” (equivalent to “Joshua”) was the name given to the Son at His incarnation. The Son, whose name is “the Word” (Rev. 19:13), was with the Father in the beginning (one person with another person). The Father prepared a body (Heb. 10:5-7) by which the Son assumed the likeness of mankind (Phil. 2:6-7). The Son - who was existing in the form of God before the incarnation, who being WITH the Father, took upon Himself a body of flesh (John 1:14). The Son “came in the Father’s name” in the sense that He was sent into the world by His Father (John 3:16). To deny this divine relationship between the Father and the Son is to not only reject the true Gospel, but such denial is that of the Antichrist spirit (1 John 2:22-24)

Address

PO Box 1188
Gilbert, WV
25621

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when What Does The Bible Say? posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to What Does The Bible Say?:

Share