https://www.facebook.com/102687851116130/posts/146593606725554/

Holy-bible The Kingdom of Heaven, 2109 Harvest Run, Garland, TX (2026)

06/06/2026

ARTICLE 1: JOHN 1:1 — WHOSE WORDS ARE THESE?

When reading any passage of Scripture, the first question should not be:

“How popular is this verse?”

but rather:

“Who is speaking?”

Because the authority of a statement depends on its source.

John 1:1 says:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Now let us examine the source of this statement.

1. Is this a direct statement from God the Father?

No.

The verse does not begin with:

* “The LORD said…”
* “Thus says the LORD…”
* “The word of the LORD came…”

Therefore, it is not a direct quotation from God the Father as found throughout the Law and the Prophets.

2. Is this a direct statement from Jesus?

No.

The text does not say:

“Jesus said…”

Nor is this presented as a direct quotation from Jesus.

It is a narrative statement written by the author.

3. Was this written by the Apostle John?

Possibly.

Church tradition attributes the Gospel to John, but the original manuscript written by John’s own hand no longer exists.

What we possess today are copies preserved through the centuries.

Historically speaking, the most accurate statement is:

“The Gospel has traditionally been attributed to John.”

Absolute proof is not available.

4. What level of authority should John 1:1 have?

If God’s direct words are considered the highest authority,

and Jesus’ direct teachings are considered the next highest authority,

then John 1:1 belongs to a different category:

A testimony or explanation given by the writer.

Therefore, it should not automatically be elevated above the direct words of God or the direct teachings of Jesus.

5. What is “the Word”?

Many people are taught that:

“The Word = Jesus.”

Yet the verse itself does not explicitly say:

“In the beginning was Jesus.”

Instead it says:

“In the beginning was the Word.”

Therefore, the meaning of “the Word” deserves careful examination.

6. Another possible understanding

The Word may not be a personal name.

The Word may represent:

* a role,
* a function,
* a mission,
* a divine office.

A role involving:

* expressing God’s will,
* communicating God’s message,
* revealing God’s purposes,
* speaking on God’s behalf.

7. What does the Old Testament show?

From Genesis to Malachi, God repeatedly used:

* angels,
* prophets,
* messengers,

to communicate His words.

They were not the source of the message.

They were the bearers of the message.

They represented God.

8. Jesus repeatedly pointed to the Father

Jesus said:

“My teaching is not Mine, but His who sent Me.”

“I do nothing on My own authority.”

“I speak just as the Father taught Me.”

These statements consistently direct attention to the Father as the ultimate source of truth.

9. Therefore

According to this interpretation:

The Word is not the source of truth.

God is the source of truth.

The Word is the office through which God’s truth is revealed to creation.

Jesus fulfilled that office perfectly.

He spoke what the Father commanded.

He did what the Father desired.

He revealed the Father to humanity.

10. The most important question

Today many debate:

“Who is the Word?”

But perhaps the more important question is:

“Whose message does the Word deliver?”

If Jesus consistently pointed people back to the Father, then our focus should not merely be on titles and theological debates.

The real question is:

Are we listening to and obeying the words of God?

Because Jesus Himself taught:

“Blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it.”

⸻

ARTICLE 2: THE WORD WAS WITH GOD — WHAT COULD THIS MEAN?

John 1:1 states:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Many readers immediately assume only one possible meaning.

However, another interpretation may be considered.

The Word was WITH God

The verse first says:

“The Word was with God.”

If one being is “with” another, the text appears to distinguish between them.

The Word is presented as being alongside God.

The Word belongs to God.

The Word serves God’s purposes.

The Word exists in God’s presence.

The Word was God

Traditional Christianity generally understands this phrase as declaring the full deity of the Word.

However, some interpreters understand it differently.

According to this view, the phrase may describe the Word as a divine being belonging to the heavenly realm rather than identifying the Word as the Supreme God Himself.

Under this interpretation:

* The Father is the Most High God.
* The Word is with the Most High God.
* The Word belongs to the divine realm.
* The Word acts as God’s representative.
* The Word carries God’s authority.
* The Word communicates God’s will.

The Word as a Divine Office

Under this understanding, “the Word” is not primarily a personal name.

It is a role.

A mission.

A divine office.

A function assigned within God’s plan.

The purpose of this office is:

* to reveal God,
* to communicate God’s will,
* to speak on God’s behalf,
* to carry out God’s purposes.

Jesus and the Office of the Word

Jesus repeatedly declared:

“I can do nothing of Myself.”

“I do not speak on My own authority.”

“My teaching is not Mine.”

These statements show Jesus continually directing people back to the Father as the ultimate source of authority.

According to this interpretation, Jesus perfectly fulfilled the office of the Word.

He became the complete expression of God’s will to mankind.

The Central Message

The main point is not merely to debate titles or theological formulas.

The main point is that:

God revealed Himself through the Word.

And that revelation was fully displayed in Jesus Christ.

Whether one agrees with this interpretation or not, every reader should carefully distinguish between:

1. What the text explicitly states.
2. What is inferred from the text.

Only then can Scripture be studied honestly, carefully, and thoughtfully.

04/16/2026

You are forced to respect an Idol who holds a certain title or position. Or is the respect genuinely earned through that Idol’s own character and actions?
How many people truly respect Kim Jong-un, the Chairman of North Korea? How many people respected the new Supreme Leader of Iran who was recently killed by the United States and Israel? How many people celebrated when they heard the news of his death?
Where was the Catholic boss, Pope Leo XIV (Robert Francis Prevost), when more than 40,000 unarmed Iranians were protesting and were gunned down on the streets by the barbaric extremist Islamic army and police of Iran? Did he open his mouth to criticize those who shot and killed more than 40,000 unarmed civilians? Why didn’t he say even a single word? Does Pope Leo have any mercy or compassion for the more than 40,000 Iranian civilians who were killed by the extremist Islamic regime? Did Mr. António Guterres, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, say anything about this incident? Do you respect these two Idols? Are they worthy of respect?
Christians are being killed and massacred everywhere. Where was Pope Leo XIV (Robert Francis Prevost)? What has he been doing for such a long time that he has not spoken out against it?
Did Pope Leo XIV (Robert Francis Prevost) condemn Russia for invading and killing countless Ukrainian civilians? Russia has killed and buried Ukrainians in many mass graves, including children, women, and the elderly.
In Venezuela for many years, the one-party government has imprisoned and killed many dissidents, while the people live in poverty, scavenging through trash for food. Where was Pope Leo XIV (Robert Francis Prevost) during all that time?
A murderer holds a gun and shoots at civilians. No one speaks up, no man opens his mouth, and no one does anything, allowing the murderer to kill even more people. Still, no one speaks out, and no one does anything.
The gunman then kills even more innocent people. Again, no one speaks up for the unarmed innocent civilians who died. Then someone comes forward to fight the gunman who has already killed so many civilians. Those who had remained silent while witnessing the slaughter of so many people now turn around and criticize the man who came to fight the murderer, using moralistic words: “Calling the man who stops the murderer a warmonger, someone who creates instability.” Many Iranians have expressed their pleas to Mr. Trump, and Mr. Trump responded to the call for help from the unarmed Iranian people. He helped the Iranian people fight against those who were armed and killing them. Pope Leo condemned Mr. Trump. So, is Pope Leo being fair and compassionate toward the Iranian people? Is Pope Leo facilitating the barbaric extremist Islamic regime in Iran? And doesn’t this mean more Iranian people will die? Is Pope Leo being evil? What is going on in Pope Leo’s mind?
What do you think is the character of those who remain silent in the face of 40,000 deaths in Iran?
If the Iranian regime continues to exist, and they successfully develop ballistic missiles with a range of 4,000 km and complete nuclear bombs, what will the world be like? We are working hard every day to build a bright future. But we also have to fight today to prevent terrible things from happening in the future. When an evil person has already killed people — and killed many — if we do not stop him, he will kill even more in the future. Hi**er started by killing a few Jews and people from other groups. When the Hi**er regime became stronger, they massacred far more people.
The war that Mr. Trump and Israel launched against Iran was to kill those who had been holding guns and shooting at the Iranian people. The number of those killed is still far fewer than the number of people they themselves had already killed. The total number of people who deserved to die and were killed is still less than the number of Iranian civilians they had slaughtered. There are still many more who should be killed so that the people can suffer less.
When evil exists, when it has already killed many people, and when it is arming itself with even more powerful weapons to kill even more, and when it openly says “death to America,” how can there be peace? Peace can only come when the evil is destroyed and brought under control. Doesn’t Pope Leo understand this basic truth? Only by killing the evildoer can there be peace. Perhaps Pope Leo was not properly educated, so he doesn’t even understand this basic principle.
Roman Catholic history also records that they participated in many wars under the fancy name of “Crusades,” in which they killed Jews. They themselves appointed the Apostle Peter — who was Jewish — as the first Pope of Catholicism. The Apostle Paul was also Jewish. Yet Catholicism has killed a great many Jews. They waged war against the very nation from which the religion they follow originated. What words do you think best describe this situation?
In the Bible, it teaches: Will the prayers of the unrighteous and the wicked be answered? If an unrighteous person without mercy, a wicked person, prays on your behalf, will it be effective? What are the consequences of walking together, eating at the same table, or participating with the wicked?
The position of Pope Leo is similar to that of the Islamic leader Ali Khamenei in Iran. Both rose to power through internal selection, not through fair elections or public debate before the people. They ascended in an unfair and unequal manner, not based on ability. The way the Catholic Pope rises to power is similar to the way it happens in one-party dictatorships where people live in misery. If Pope Leo XIV wants to prove his biblical competence, I am ready to register for a public debate on the teachings of the Bible. No church doctrines or traditions allowed — only the Bible itself may be used for the debate.
Is Pope Leo XIV (Robert Francis Prevost) someone who needs to be respected, someone worthy of respect, or is he a hypocrite, a scoundrel? Know that this is a question for you to answer and affirm for yourself.

02/12/2026

I. THE ORIGINAL TEXT: WHAT IS “THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL”?

📖 Genesis 2:17

“But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (etz ha-da‘at tov va-ra), you shall not eat…”

1. The Hebrew Keyword
• Da‘at (דַּעַת) = knowledge through experience, grasping authority, determining
• Not merely “knowing information”
• But the authority to define and to judge

📌 Example:
• “Adam knew Eve” = relational union + covenantal authority
• “Knowing good and evil” = determining good and evil, establishing moral standards

👉 Therefore, this is not merely a tree of moral information.

⸻

2. “Good and Evil” Is a Legal Idiom

In Scripture:

📖 Deuteronomy 1:39
“who today have no knowledge of good or evil” = not yet possessing legal discernment

📖 2 Samuel 14:17
“the king discerns good and evil” = judicial authority like a king

👉 “Good and evil” refers to the authority to establish standards, not merely personal morality.

⸻

II. COMMENTARY OF FR. NGUYEN THE THUAN

Fr. Nguyen The Thuan (drawing from the Bible de Jérusalem) clearly understood this point.

1. The Tree Symbolizes God’s Prerogative

“In context, such knowledge is God’s prerogative,
and it is seized through sin.”

📌 Meaning:
• Only God has the authority to:
• define good and evil
• judge right and wrong
• Humans are to live according to His standard, not establish their own.

⸻

2. “Do Not Eat” ≠ Forbidding Knowledge

It forbids seizing authority.

Fr. Thuấn emphasizes:

“It is not a prohibition of intelligence, but a prohibition of moral autonomy — a ban on man placing himself in the position of God.”

👉 This is about authority, not intellectual capacity.

⸻

III. CONNECTION WITH GENESIS 1:2 — “DARKNESS OVER THE DEEP”

📖 Genesis 1:2

“The earth was formless and void…
and darkness was over the face of the deep.”

1. “Darkness” (ḥōšek) Is Not Evil
• No light yet → no order
• No separation → no defined boundaries

👉 Only when God speaks:
• light is created
• order is established
• boundaries are defined

📌 Meaning:

Good and evil exist rightly only when defined by God.

⸻

2. The Tree as a Boundary of Order
• Adam:
• lived in God’s light
• yet did not possess judicial authority
• The tree represented:
• the boundary between obedience and autonomy
• (Autonomy is different from stewardship.)

⸻

IV. WHY DOES EATING THE FRUIT = THE FALL?

📖 Genesis 3:5

“You will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

📌 This is the key verse.

The sin was not:

❌ eating fruit
❌ desiring knowledge

The sin was:

✅ wanting to become the standard in place of God

👉 Humanity:
• no longer asks, “What did God say?”
• but asks, “What do I think is right or wrong?”

⸻

V. CONNECTION WITH JESUS (FINAL CONFIRMATION)

📖 John 5:30

“I can do nothing on My own… I judge only as I hear.”

📖 John 7:16

“My teaching is not Mine, but His who sent Me.”

👉 Jesus did the opposite of Adam:
• He did not establish His own standard
• He always referred everything back to the Father

📌 Therefore:
• Adam = took from the tree of knowing good and evil → fell
• Jesus = refused autonomous authority → righteous

⸻

VI. CONCISE SUMMARY (5 LINES)
1. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil is not about information, but authority.
2. “Knowing good and evil” means the right to define right and wrong — which belongs only to God.
3. The prohibition was against moral autonomy, not against knowledge.
4. The Fall occurred when humanity seized God’s judicial authority.
5. Jesus redeems humanity by fully returning that authority to the Father.

⸻

If you would like, I can also:
• create a one-page visual diagram (clean and precise)
• compare this with 1 Enoch, Job, and Ecclesiastes
• or write a structured comparison: Adam – Jesus – The Law

02/02/2026

WHY DID JESUS ALWAYS ATTRIBUTE EVERYTHING TO “THE COMMANDMENT OF THE FATHER”?
1. Because the Father is the sole source of Law and Truth.
In the entire Old Testament:
• Jehovah speaks
• Jehovah writes, and sends Moses to record it.
• Jehovah establishes covenants
📖 Isaiah 33:22
“For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king…”
👉 The authority to establish commandments is never shared.
Jesus positions Himself as the One sent, so He always refers everything back to the Father.

2. Jesus Himself confirms that He does not originate commandments on His own.
📖 John 12:49–50
“For I have not spoken on My own authority, but the Father who sent Me has Himself given Me a commandment—what to say and what to speak. And I know that His commandment is eternal life…”
📌 Note:
• There is no phrase like “My commandment” in the sense of originating source.
• Everything He teaches is what the Father commanded.
👉 This is the most fundamental reason.

II. DID JESUS GIVE ANY COMMANDMENT OF HIS OWN?
👉 The precise answer is: NO, in the sense that the Father gave it (as originating lawgiver).

1. The “new commandment” was presented by the apostles and the church as a basis for judgment, but it is not a newly originated law.
📖 John 13:34
“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another.”
But:
• The content already existed (Leviticus 19:18 – love your neighbor as yourself)
• “New” refers to the standard or model of living (as I have loved you), not to a new source of law.
📖 John 15:10
“If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love.”
👉 “My commandments” = the Father’s commandments as lived out and exemplified through My life.

2. Jesus never:
• Wrote a new law
• Publicly proclaimed a new table of laws
• Established new penalties
📌 This was intentional, not an oversight.

III. WHY DID JESUS NOT RECORD HIS OWN COMMANDMENTS AS THE FATHER DID?
This is the deepest question. The Bible gives 4 very clear reasons:

1. Because Jesus did not come to establish a new covenant of law.
📖 Matthew 5:17
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”
If He:
• Wrote a new law
• Replaced the old one
→ He would have contradicted Himself.

2. Because He came to fulfill the Law, not to rewrite it.
📖 Romans 10:4
“For Christ is the end [fulfillment / culmination] of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”
👉 “Fulfill” ≠ “rewrite” 👉 “Fulfill” = living out its original true meaning perfectly.

3. Because the new covenant is not written on stone, but on the heart.
📖 Jeremiah 31:33
“I will put My law within them, and I will write it on their hearts…”
📖 Ezekiel 36:26–27
“I will give you a new heart… And I will put My Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in My statutes…”
👉 Jesus’ role:
• Opens the way
• Sets the example
• Gives the Holy Spirit
📌 Not holding a pen to write laws.

4. Because if Jesus had written His own commandments → He would become a “second Adam” in a negative sense.
That is:
• Establishing His own standard of good and evil
• Parallel to the Father
📌 But He never did that.
📖 John 5:19
“The Son can do nothing of His own accord, but only what He sees the Father doing…”

IV. SUMMARY IN 5 VERY PRECISE LINES
1. The Father is the sole source of commandments.
2. Jesus is the Sent One, not the Lawgiver.
3. He “gives commandments” through His life and example, not through written tables.
4. The new covenant does not add laws, but writes the law on the heart.
5. Therefore, Jesus did not record His own commandments—and did not need to.

FINAL STATEMENT (staying true to your line of thought)
The Father gives the Law.
The Son fulfills the Law.
The Holy Spirit writes the Law on the heart.

01/29/2026

BASIC POINTS TO NOTE WHEN READING THE BIBLE

1️⃣ The Core of the Bible Is the Five Books of the Torah (Pentateuch)

The Five Books of the Torah (Genesis → Deuteronomy) are the absolute foundation, because they:
• Record the laws spoken by God the Father
• Establish the standard of holiness
• Define principles of judgment, righteousness, sin, and punishment
• Identify who the holy people are and how they must live

📖 Deuteronomy 4:8

“And what great nation is there that has statutes and judgments so righteous as all this law?”

👉 All other books of the Bible:
• Prophets
• Psalms
• Historical books
• Gospel narratives
• Epistles

➡️ serve to explain, remind, warn, or call people back to the Torah.
No book replaces, corrects, or surpasses the Five Books of Moses.

⸻

2️⃣ “Scripture” According to Jesus and Paul = the Old Testament

According to the definition found within the New Testament itself:

📖 Luke 24:44

“The Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms…”

📖 2 Timothy 3:15–16

“From childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures…”

➡️ When Jesus and Paul spoke of “Scripture,” only one body of writings existed:
👉 THE OLD TESTAMENT

❌ There was no concept of a “New Testament” in the time of Jesus
❌ There was no “new Scripture” issued or written by Jesus

➡️ Therefore:
• “Scripture” must be defined according to Jesus’ understanding
• It cannot be defined according to later church tradition

⸻

3️⃣ Paul’s Words Are Not Equal to the Words of God the Father

📖 1 Corinthians 7:12

“I say this, not the Lord.”

📖 Romans 3:4

“Let God be true, but every man a liar.”

➡️ Paul’s words are:
• Counsel
• Testimony
• Spiritual guidance in specific contexts

❌ They are not:
• Law
• Judicial standards
• Absolute divine decrees

👉 Law comes only from God the Father
👉 Paul’s words have value only when they do not contradict that law

⸻

4️⃣ Jesus Did Not Issue New Laws, Nor Did He Amend the Father’s Law

📖 Matthew 5:17–19

“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law…”

📖 John 7:16

“My teaching is not Mine…”

📖 John 5:19

“The Son can do nothing of Himself…”

➡️ If Jesus had issued new laws:
• They would have been formally recorded
• Publicly proclaimed
• Established as judicial standards

❌ But:
• Jesus did not command that laws be written
• He did not establish a legal code
• He did not alter the Father’s law

📌 The four Gospels:
• Are narrative accounts
• Written by apostles or disciples
• 30–50 years later
• Collected and compiled by the church

➡️ Therefore:
• It cannot be said that Jesus issued laws
• Even less can it be said that He corrected or revised the Father’s law

The law given by God the Father is holy.
The failure of Israel to keep the law does not mean the law itself was incomplete or in need of revision.

⸻

5️⃣ The Law of God the Father Is the Standard of Holiness and Life

📖 Leviticus 18:5

“The one who does them shall live by them.”

📖 Psalm 119:142

“Your law is truth.”

📖 Deuteronomy 6:25

“It will be righteousness for us.”

➡️ The law is:
• Not for debate
• Not for selective obedience
• But to be practiced

👉 Whoever does all that God the Father commands:
• Is counted as righteous
• Will live
• Because His word is true

⸻

6️⃣ Humanity Is Created to Obey, Not to Judge God’s Word

📖 Ecclesiastes 12:13

“Fear God and keep His commandments.”

📖 Romans 9:20

“Who are you, O man, to answer back to God?”

📖 John 8:12

“I am the light of the world.”

➡️ If:
• The word of God the Father is a lamp

Then humanity has only two choices:
1. Walk in the light
2. Walk into darkness

❌ There is no third option:
• To judge
• To downgrade or elevate
• To apply or reject based on era, culture, or location

👉 The creation does not judge the Creator
👉 A sinner has no authority to judge holy words

⸻

🔚 CONCISE CONCLUSION
• The Bible must be read beginning with the Torah
• Truth comes from the words of God the Father
• Jesus confirms and exemplifies obedience
• The apostles testify; they do not legislate
• Humanity is created to hear – believe – and obey

📖 Psalm 119:105

“Your word is a lamp to my feet.”

01/03/2026

Is it permissible to use the day of the resurrection of the Son of God (Lord Jesus) to change the commandment of God the Father (Jehovah God)? Is following a criminal organization a wise choice?
🔴 SHORT AND CONCISE ANSWER
NO, IT IS NOT PERMITTED.
No one—even in the name of Lord Jesus—is allowed to change the commandments of God the Father.
Doing so → commits a very grave sin before God.
I️⃣ IS IT PERMITTED TO CHANGE THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD THE FATHER?
📖 God the Father clearly declared:
“Whatever I command you, be careful to observe it;
you shall not add to it nor take away from it.”
(Deuteronomy 12:32)
“I am Jehovah; I do not change.”
(Malachi 3:6)
👉 The law from God the Father is eternal and does not vary according to any historical event.
II️⃣ DID LORD JESUS PERMIT CHANGING THE COMMANDMENTS?
📖 Direct words of Lord Jesus:
“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law…
until heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law.”
(Matthew 5:17–18)
“Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments… shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.”
(Matthew 5:19)
👉 Lord Jesus did not grant authority to change the law; on the contrary, He confirmed its unchanging value.
III️⃣ IS THERE ANY VERSE WHERE LORD JESUS SAID: “CHANGE THE SABBATH DAY”?
❌ THERE IS NONE.
• There is no verse where Lord Jesus said:
“From now on, abandon the Sabbath day.”
• There is no verse where He said:
“Worship God the Father on the day I (the Son) rose again.”
📖 On the contrary:
“I have kept My Father’s commandments.”
(John 15:10)
👉 If Lord Jesus did not change it, who dares to change it?
IV️⃣ USING THE DAY OF LORD JESUS’ RESURRECTION TO CHANGE THE COMMANDMENT → WHAT SINS DOES IT COMMIT?
🔥 1️⃣ SIN OF ADDING TO GOD’S LAW
📖
“You shall not add to… nor take away.” (Deuteronomy 12:32)
➡️ Arbitrarily setting another day = adding a new law
➡️ This is rebellion against God’s legislative authority
🔥 2️⃣ SIN OF ABOLISHING THE COMMANDMENT
📖
“You make the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition.”
(Mark 7:13)
➡️ Replacing the day God commanded = abolishing the fourth commandment
🔥 3️⃣ SIN OF EXALTING MAN ABOVE GOD
📖
“Cursed is the man who trusts in man.”
(Jeremiah 17:5)
➡️ Trusting community/church more than God’s word = idolizing humans
⸻
🔥 4️⃣ SIN OF USING LORD JESUS’ NAME TO DO WHAT HE NEVER COMMANDED
📖
“You shall not take the name of Jehovah in vain.”
(Exodus 20:7)
➡️ Attributing to Lord Jesus what He never said = misusing the Lord’s name
⸻
V️⃣ CONSEQUENCES & PUNISHMENT ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURE
⚖️ 1️⃣ COUNTED AS DESPISING GOD THE FATHER’S WORD
📖
“Whoever despises the word of Jehovah… that person’s guilt shall be upon him.”
(Numbers 15:31)
⸻
⚖️ 2️⃣ WORSHIP COUNTED AS FUTILE
📖
“Their worship of Me is in vain.”
(Mark 7:7)
➡️ No matter how zealous, God does not accept it.
⸻
⚖️ 3️⃣ JUDGED BY THE WORD SPOKEN—NOT BY TRADITION
📖
“The word that I have spoken will judge him in the last day.”
(John 12:48)
⸻
VI️⃣ FINAL CONCLUSION – ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURE
🔔 No event—not even the resurrection—
is permitted to be used to alter the commandments of God the Father.
• Lord Jesus is glorified through obedience, not by changing the law
• Whoever changes the commandments places themselves in God’s position
• That is a very grave sin
⸻
If you want to continue, the following steps are very important:
• 📌 Examine the entire Bible to see if God the Father ever changed the day of worship
• 📌 Analyze the historical origin of changing the day (not according to Scripture)
• 📌 Point out why many zealous people are still wrong
The historical origin of changing the day of worship (from Sabbath to the first day) according to historical records and Scripture, so you can clearly see: this did NOT originate from the command of God the Father, nor from the words of Lord Jesus.
⸻
I️⃣ AFFIRMATION FIRST – ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURE
🔴 There is not a single verse:
• God the Father saying: “Change the day”
• Lord Jesus saying: “Worship on the day I rose again”
• Lord Jesus authorizing anyone to change the commandments
👉 Therefore, any change must come from humans and history, not from divine revelation.
⸻
II️⃣ HISTORICAL ORIGIN – WHERE DID THE CHANGE OF DAY COME FROM?
1️⃣ EARLY CHURCH (1ST CENTURY) – NO CHANGE YET
📖 Acts of the Apostles shows:
• The apostles kept the Sabbath
• Taught in synagogues on the Sabbath
• Did not establish a new day of worship
👉 1st century:
• Jewish believers: kept Sabbath
• Gentile believers: taught within that framework
➡️ No “Sunday” as a commandment yet
⸻
2️⃣ MAJOR TURNING POINT: SEPARATION FROM JEWS (2ND CENTURY)
📌 Political context:
• After Jewish revolts (AD 70, 132–135)
• Roman Empire hated and persecuted Judaism
• Any group resembling Judaism was suspected
👉 Church gradually wanted to separate from Judaism:
• Avoid Sabbath (Jewish sign)
• Avoid Mosaic law
• Create “non-Jewish” identity
⚠️ This was political-social motive, not spiritual revelation.
⸻
3️⃣ INFLUENCE OF PAGAN CULTURE – “DAY OF THE SUN”
📌 In Rome:
• First day called dies Solis (Day of the Sun)
• Linked to worship of Sun god (Sol Invictus, Mithras)
👉 When Gentile believers became majority:
• This day was familiar
• Easier to accept than Sabbath
⚠️ This was cultural compromise, not Scripture.
⸻
4️⃣ EDICT OF EMPEROR CONSTANTINE (AD 321)
📜 Key historical event
Emperor Constantine issued decree:
“On the venerable day of the Sun, let magistrates and city dwellers rest.”
👉 This was:
• Civil law, not God’s word
• Applied empire-wide
• Served political unity
⚠️ Constantine:
• Not baptized until near death
• Retained pagan mindset
• Used religion to stabilize empire
➡️ Sunday legalized by state, not Scripture.
⸻
5️⃣ CHURCH LATER LEGITIMIZED IT
After state adoption:
• Church theologized the change
• Attached meaning “resurrection”
• Gradually viewed Sabbath as “Judaism”
📌 But:
• Meaning attached later
• No original divine command
⸻
III️⃣ WHAT DID THE CHURCH FATHERS ADMIT?
Many church fathers did not dare claim a command from God, but said:
• “The Church has authority”
• “Apostolic tradition” (without quoting Scripture)
👉 This itself proves:
The change of day has no Scriptural foundation. They are opposing God.
⸻
IV️⃣ EXAMINE BY GOD’S WORD – THEOLOGICAL CONCLUSION
📖 Deuteronomy 12:32
“You shall not add… nor take away.”
📖 Mark 7:7
“Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.”
📖 John 12:48
“The word I spoke will judge him.”
➡️ Changing the day = adding what was not commanded
➡️ Worship based on addition = futile
⸻
V️⃣ FINAL CLEAR CONCLUSION
🔴 Changing the day:
• ❌ Not from God the Father
• ❌ Not from Lord Jesus
• ❌ Not from the apostles
• ✅ From history – politics – human tradition, guided by darkness to oppose God.
⚖️ The issue is not “which day is convenient,”
but: who has authority to establish commandments?
⸻
If you want, the next step is very important:
• 📌 Compare Sabbath in Genesis – Law – Lord Jesus – early church
• 📌 Analyze why many keep tradition yet think they obey
• 📌 Answer difficult question: “What about those who don’t know?”
Which direction do you want to continue?

Holy-bible The Kingdom of Heaven

06/06/2026

04/16/2026

02/12/2026

02/02/2026

01/29/2026

01/03/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category