Waken Temple

Call Directions Website Contact the place of worship

Waken Temple Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Waken Temple, Buddhist Temple, El Monte, CA.

漢傳佛法・經典英譯・聞思行持。
「雲上威光」為本寺線上道場；AI 建築意象非寺院實景。
Dharma teachings, translations & practice.
線上道場：
https://www.wakentemple.org/
經典英譯與相關著述：
https://waken.org/
願正法久住，法水長流，普惠十方群生。

【讀典札記｜解深密經 15／18】第一地為什麼叫「極喜」？——〈地波羅蜜多品〉十地的名字，就是十地的功課菩薩十地的名字，初學的人多半先背過一遍：極喜、離垢、發光、焰慧、極難勝、現前、遠行、不動、善慧、法雲。但為什麼第一地叫「極喜」？觀自在菩...
10/24/2026

【讀典札記｜解深密經 15／18】

第一地為什麼叫「極喜」？
——〈地波羅蜜多品〉十地的名字，就是十地的功課

菩薩十地的名字，初學的人多半先背過一遍：極喜、離垢、發光、焰慧、極難勝、現前、遠行、不動、善慧、法雲。但為什麼第一地叫「極喜」？觀自在菩薩替我們問了。

唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈地波羅蜜多品〉說：

「成就大義，得未曾得出世間心，生大歡喜，是故最初名極喜地。」

〔T16 no. 676，p. 704a14–15〕

依 waken．org 義疏，這一品先講十地由四種清淨、十一分所攝，再逐地釋名。極喜，不是情緒上的高興，而是「成就大義、得未曾得出世間心」之後生起的歡喜——第一次真正見到出世間的心，那份喜是有根據的。接下來每一地的名字，都對應一件做到的事：遠離一切微細犯戒，所以叫離垢；所得三摩地與聞持陀羅尼能為無量智光作依止，所以叫發光；菩提分法燒諸煩惱、慧如火焰，所以叫焰慧；極難的事做到了，所以叫極難勝；觀諸行流轉、無相作意現前，所以叫現前；入無缺無間無相作意、鄰近清淨地，所以叫遠行；於無相得無功用、相中不為煩惱所動，所以叫不動；說法自在、得無過廣慧，所以叫善慧；麁重之身如空、法身圓滿如雲，所以叫法雲。

名字不是頭銜，是履歷。

經文後面還說，十地之外，「第十一說名佛地」；十一地各有二種愚癡及彼麁重為所對治，一共二十二愚、十一麁重。每一地的名字，也是那一地剛剛放下的東西。

把這一段帶回日常，可以觀察三處：我修行中有過「未曾得」的時刻嗎——哪怕很小，是否真的因此生起過歡喜？我追求的「進步」，是名字，還是名字背後那件做到的事？今天是否少了一分犯戒的放逸？遇到困難時，是否多了一分不退的精進？

十地不能被拿來自我定位——「離垢」「遠行」是地名，不是我們今天可以自封的狀態；經文明說這是菩薩從初地到佛地的事，不是修行者的分數表。讀它，是為了知道路有多長、每一步在放下什麼。

願我們的歡喜，都有出世間的根。

延伸閱讀：
waken．org › 譯注 › 漢傳 › 唯識 › 解深密經 › 品七 地波羅蜜多品

#讀典札記 #解深密經

Reading the Saṃdhinirmocana · 15/18

Why Is the First Ground Called “Great Joy”?
— Chapter Seven, the Grounds and the Perfections: the names of the ten grounds are their lessons

Most beginners first memorise the ten bodhisattva grounds as a list: Great Joy, Freedom from Defilement, Radiance, Blazing Wisdom, Most Hard to Conquer, Manifestation, Far Travel, Immovability, Excellent Wisdom, Dharma-Cloud. But why is the first called Great Joy? Avalokiteśvara asks for us.

Chapter Seven of the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, in Xuanzang's Chinese translation, reads in Waken's English rendering:

“Having accomplished the great purpose, having gained the supramundane mind never gained before, there arises great gladness — and so the first is named the Ground of Great Joy.”

[T16 no. 676, p. 704a14–15]

Waken's exposition follows the chapter from the four purities and eleven portions that comprise the grounds into the naming of each. Great Joy is not a mood. It is the gladness that arises on accomplishing the great purpose and gaining, for the first time, a supramundane mind — a joy with a ground under it. Each name that follows answers a thing done: far removed from every subtle breach of discipline, hence Freedom from Defilement; samādhi and dhāraṇī able to support a measureless light of wisdom, hence Radiance; the limbs of awakening burning the afflictions, wisdom like a flame, hence Blazing Wisdom; mastery won in what is hardest, hence Most Hard to Conquer; markless attention now manifest, hence Manifestation; entry into unbroken markless attention bordering the pure grounds, hence Far Travel; effortlessness in the markless, unstirred amid marks, hence Immovability; mastery in teaching and faultless vast wisdom, hence Excellent Wisdom; the body of coarse heaviness vast as space and the Dharma-body full as a cloud, hence Dharma-Cloud.

A name is not a title. It is a record.

The chapter goes on to add that beyond the ten, “the eleventh is called the Buddha-ground,” and that on each of the eleven two forms of ignorance and one coarse heaviness are what is countered — twenty-two and eleven in all. Each ground's name is also what that ground has just set down.

Three places to look: Have I had a “never gained before” moment in practice — however small — and did gladness actually arise? Is the progress I seek a name, or the thing done behind the name? Was there, today, a little less carelessness about the precepts? Meeting difficulty, was there a little more vigour that does not turn back?

The ten grounds are not for self-ranking — “Freedom from Defilement” and “Far Travel” are the names of grounds, not states we may claim for a day. The sūtra is explicit that these are the bodhisattva's grounds from the first to the Buddha-ground, not a practitioner's scorecard. We read them to know how long the road is, and what each step lets go.

May our gladness have supramundane roots.

Further reading:
waken．org › Translations › Han › Yogācāra › Saṃdhinirmocana › Chapter Seven

【讀典札記｜解深密經 14／18】心太浮、心太沉，各該怎麼辦？——〈分別瑜伽品〉止相・舉相・捨相打坐的人大概都遇過這兩種情況：一種是心靜不下來，念頭一個接一個；另一種是心沉下去了，昏昏欲睡。經文給了對應的辦法，還加了第三種：兩邊都沒事的時候...
10/23/2026

【讀典札記｜解深密經 14／18】

心太浮、心太沉，各該怎麼辦？
——〈分別瑜伽品〉止相・舉相・捨相

打坐的人大概都遇過這兩種情況：一種是心靜不下來，念頭一個接一個；另一種是心沉下去了，昏昏欲睡。經文給了對應的辦法，還加了第三種：兩邊都沒事的時候，該做什麼。

唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈分別瑜伽品〉說：

「若心掉舉或恐掉舉時，諸可厭法作意及彼無間心作意，是名止相。若心沈沒或恐沈沒時，諸可欣法作意及彼心相作意，是名舉相。若於一向止道，或於一向觀道，或於雙運轉道，二隨煩惱所染污時，諸無功用作意，及心任運轉中所有作意，是名捨相。」

〔T16 no. 676，p. 699b22–28〕

依 waken．org 義疏，這是圓測所科十八門中的第十一門「止舉捨相差別門」。三個相，是三種調心的手法。掉舉或將要掉舉時，用「止相」：作意可厭之法，讓心收斂；並作意「無間心」——經文前面定義：「緣彼影像心，奢摩他所緣」——讓心回到止的所緣。沈沒或將要沈沒時，用「舉相」：作意可欣之法，讓心振起；並作意「心相」——經文定義：「三摩地所行有分別影像，毘鉢舍那所緣」——讓心在觀境上明利。捨相，依圓測疏，是於止道、觀道或雙運道中離沈掉之後，無功用、任運而轉，不再加力。

校讀說明：捨相一句，玄奘本作「二隨煩惱所染污時」，《瑜伽師地論》卷七十七同；菩提流支異譯作「煩惱不染於心」。本篇對捨相的說明，依圓測離沈掉而任運的釋義；原典文字與解釋層分別保留，不改經文。沈掉未除時，不是捨的時候。

經文裡最細的一個字是「恐」：心還沒掉舉，只是「恐掉舉」，就該先用止相。調心不是等到失控才救，而是在將失未失之間。

把這一段帶回日常，可以觀察三處：我今天的心，偏浮還是偏沉？我對治的方法，是不是用反了——心已經沉了還在壓，心已經浮了還在鼓舞？當心剛好平穩的時候，我能不能什麼都不加，讓它任運？

這三相是止觀中的調心，不能直接拿來當情緒管理的口訣；但它背後的道理——先看方向，再下對治——在哪裡都用得上。

願我們的心，該收時收，該舉時舉，該放時放。

延伸閱讀：
waken．org › 譯注 › 漢傳 › 唯識 › 解深密經 › 品六 分別瑜伽品

#讀典札記 #解深密經

Reading the Saṃdhinirmocana · 14/18

When the Mind Floats, When the Mind Sinks — What Then?
— Chapter Six, the mark of settling, the mark of rousing, the mark of equanimity

Anyone who has sat has met both: a mind that will not settle, thought following thought; and a mind that sinks, drowsy and dim. The sūtra gives a remedy for each, and adds a third: what to do when neither is happening.

Chapter Six of the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, in Xuanzang's Chinese translation, reads in Waken's English rendering:

“When the mind is restless, or when one fears it may become restless, to attend to the various dharmas that may be wearied of, and to attend to that uninterrupted mind — this is called the mark of settling. When the mind sinks low, or when one fears it may sink low, to attend to the various dharmas that may be delighted in, and to attend to that mental mark — this is called the mark of rousing. When, upon the path that is wholly calm, or the path that is wholly insight, or the path of joint operation, one is defiled by those two secondary afflictions, then whatever attention is effortless, and whatever attention there is in the mind's coursing of its own accord — this is called the mark of equanimity.”

[T16 no. 676, p. 699b22–28]

Waken's exposition places this at the eleventh of Woncheuk's eighteen gates. Three marks, three ways of tuning the mind. When restless, or about to be, use settling: attend to what can be wearied of, so the mind draws in, and to the “uninterrupted mind” — defined earlier in the chapter as the mind that takes the image as its object, the object of calm — so it returns to the object of calm. When sinking, or about to, use rousing: attend to what can be delighted in, so the mind lifts, and to the “mental mark” — defined as the image with discrimination engaged in samādhi, the object of insight — so it grows sharp upon the object of insight. Equanimity, as Woncheuk reads it, is for when the path of calm, of insight, or of both together has been freed of sinking and restlessness: effortless attention, letting the mind course of its own accord, adding no further force.

A note on the text: in the clause on equanimity, Xuanzang's translation reads “is defiled by those two secondary afflictions,” and the Yogācārabhūmi, fascicle 77, agrees; Bodhiruci's earlier translation reads “the afflictions do not defile the mind.” This post explains equanimity according to Woncheuk's reading — freedom from sinking and restlessness, then letting the mind run. The wording of the source and the layer of interpretation are kept apart; the quotation is not altered. While sinking or restlessness remains, it is not yet the time for equanimity.

The finest word in the passage is “fears.” The mind has not yet become restless; one only fears it may — and already the mark of settling applies. Tuning the mind is not rescue after loss of control, but adjustment in the moment between.

Three places to look: Today, does my mind lean toward floating or sinking? Is my remedy reversed — pressing down a mind already sunk, cheering on a mind already scattered? When the mind is simply steady, can I add nothing and let it run?

These three marks belong to calm and insight; they are not a formula for managing emotions. But the principle beneath them — see the direction first, then apply the counter — serves anywhere.

May our minds gather when gathering is needed, rise when rising is needed, and rest when rest is needed.

Further reading:
waken．org › Translations › Han › Yogācāra › Saṃdhinirmocana › Chapter Six

【讀典札記｜解深密經 13／18】觀的時候，心看見的是誰？——〈分別瑜伽品〉唯識所現：影像與心無異打坐觀一個影像的時候，觀的心是一邊，被觀的影像是另一邊——這幾乎是每個初學者的預設。慈氏菩薩替我們把這個預設拿到佛面前。唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈...
10/22/2026

【讀典札記｜解深密經 13／18】

觀的時候，心看見的是誰？
——〈分別瑜伽品〉唯識所現：影像與心無異

打坐觀一個影像的時候，觀的心是一邊，被觀的影像是另一邊——這幾乎是每個初學者的預設。慈氏菩薩替我們把這個預設拿到佛面前。

唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈分別瑜伽品〉說：

「當言無異。何以故？由彼影像唯是識故。善男子！我說識所緣，唯識所現故。」

〔T16 no. 676，p. 698a29–b02〕

依 waken．org 義疏，慈氏問：毘鉢舍那三摩地所行的影像，與此心，有異無異？佛答：無異，因為影像唯是識，「我說識所緣，唯識所現」。慈氏追問：若影像即心，那怎麼是「此心還見此心」？佛說：「此中無有少法能見少法；然即此心如是生時，即有如是影像顯現。」就像善淨的鏡面，看似見到影像，其實是這個識如是生起時，影像便如是顯現，沒有一個另外的能見者。

《攝大乘論》具名引用了這一段；「唯識」這個詞的經源，就在這裡。但要注意經文的範圍：它是在止觀的脈絡裡說的——定中的影像與定心無異——然後才推及於一切：「若諸有情自性而住，緣色等心所行影像，彼與此心亦無異耶？」佛答「亦無異」，只是凡夫「顛倒覺」，不知那些影像也唯是識。

把這一段帶回日常，可以觀察三處：我討厭一個人的時候，心裡那個「他」，是他本人，還是我識上的影像？我以為「我在觀察情緒」，有沒有留意到觀察者和被觀察的情緒，是同一個心的生起？知道了「唯識所現」，我是更有能力轉化影像，還是只是多了一句話來否認別人？

這一段不能被誤讀為「只有我存在」，也不能用來取消因果與對他人的責任；經文說的是「所緣影像」與心無異，不是說別人不存在。但同樣不宜把「唯識所現」縮小成一般的心理投射：圓測疏引世親、無性，說影像與心「無別有體」，這比「情緒影響看法」強得多。它首先是修觀的法；它的義理分量，要到義疏裡讀。

願我們在影像裡，看見顯現它的心。

延伸閱讀：
waken．org › 譯注 › 漢傳 › 唯識 › 解深密經 › 品六 分別瑜伽品

#讀典札記 #解深密經

Reading the Saṃdhinirmocana · 13/18

When Contemplating, Whom Does the Mind See?
— Chapter Six, consciousness-only: the image and the mind are not different

When one contemplates an image in meditation, the observing mind seems to be on one side and the observed image on the other — almost every beginner assumes so. Maitreya brings this assumption before the Buddha on our behalf.

Chapter Six of the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, in Xuanzang's Chinese translation, reads in Waken's English rendering:

“They should be said to be no different. Why so? Because that image is only consciousness. Good son! What I teach as the object of consciousness is only the manifestation of consciousness.”

[T16 no. 676, p. 698a29–b02]

Waken's exposition follows the exchange. Maitreya asks whether the image engaged in the samādhi of insight is different from the mind. The Buddha: not different, for the image is only consciousness; the object of consciousness is only what consciousness manifests. Maitreya presses: if the image is the mind, how does this mind see this mind? The Buddha: here no dharma whatever sees any dharma; rather, when this mind arises thus, such an image appears. Like a clean mirror, which seems to see an image, while in fact the image simply appears as the consciousness arises — there is no separate seer.

The Mahāyāna-saṃgraha quotes this passage by name; the scriptural source of the term “consciousness-only” is here. Note the sūtra's scope, though. It speaks first within calm and insight — the image in samādhi is not different from the mind in samādhi — and only then extends: are the images engaged by the ordinary mind taking forms and the rest as objects also not different? “Also not different,” the Buddha says; it is only that ordinary beings, through a topsy-turvy awareness, fail to know those images as only consciousness.

Three places to look: When I dislike someone, is the “him” in my mind the person, or an image upon my consciousness? When I think “I am observing my emotion,” have I noticed that observer and observed arise as one mind? Knowing “only the manifestation of consciousness,” am I better able to transform the image — or merely armed with one more sentence for dismissing others?

This passage cannot be misread as “only I exist,” nor used to cancel causality and responsibility toward others. It says the object-image is not different from the mind, not that other people do not exist. But neither should “only the manifestation of consciousness” be shrunk to ordinary psychological projection: Woncheuk, citing Vasubandhu and Asvabhāva, says the image has “no separate substance” from the mind — a far stronger claim than “my mood colours what I see.” It is first a method of contemplation; the weight of its doctrine is to be read in the exposition.

May we see, within the image, the mind that manifests it.

Further reading:
waken．org › Translations › Han › Yogācāra › Saṃdhinirmocana › Chapter Six

【讀典札記｜解深密經 12／18】打坐之前，先要站在哪裡？——〈分別瑜伽品〉止觀的依與住，四種所緣很多人問怎麼打坐，很少人問打坐之前要先立在哪裡。慈氏菩薩問的第一句，就是這個。唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈分別瑜伽品〉說：「當知菩薩法假安立，及不捨...
10/21/2026

【讀典札記｜解深密經 12／18】

打坐之前，先要站在哪裡？
——〈分別瑜伽品〉止觀的依與住，四種所緣

很多人問怎麼打坐，很少人問打坐之前要先立在哪裡。慈氏菩薩問的第一句，就是這個。

唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈分別瑜伽品〉說：

「當知菩薩法假安立，及不捨阿耨多羅三藐三菩提願，為依、為住，於大乘中修奢摩他、毘鉢舍那。」

〔T16 no. 676，p. 697c16–18〕

依 waken．org 義疏，這一品從第六品起進入「能觀行」，前五品所觀的境，到這裡要落實成修。慈氏問：菩薩何依何住，於大乘中修止觀？佛答兩樣：法假安立——佛所安立的教法，是止觀的「依」；不捨無上菩提願，是止觀的「住」。一個是教，一個是願。沒有教，止觀無從下手；沒有願，止觀修到安樂處就停了。

接著慈氏問所緣：有分別影像、無分別影像、事邊際、所作成辦，四種所緣境事。佛答：無分別影像是奢摩他所緣，有分別影像是毘鉢舍那所緣，後兩種是俱所緣。止，是心安住於一個不加分別的影像；觀，是心在影像上作有分別的簡擇；修到事邊際，一切所知盡在其中；修到所作成辦，轉依完成。

這一段把止觀的起點講得很老實：不是先有一個神祕的體驗，而是先有教法、先有願。這裡先說的是所緣與用心方式；經文另以「身心輕安」作界線——未得輕安之前的作意，只是「隨順奢摩他勝解相應作意」，不宜把初步安住便稱為已得止觀。

把這一段帶回日常，可以觀察三處：我打坐時，心裡有沒有一個「依」——一段我真正受持的教法？有沒有一個「住」——一個比舒服更大的願？我的「觀」，是在教法上簡擇，還是在自己的想像裡漫遊？

止觀的依住不能省略，不能以為「什麼都不想」就是奢摩他；經文說得清楚，無分別影像仍是一個「所緣」。

願我們先立定依與住，再談坐下來。

延伸閱讀：
waken．org › 譯注 › 漢傳 › 唯識 › 解深密經 › 品六 分別瑜伽品

#讀典札記 #解深密經

Reading the Saṃdhinirmocana · 12/18

Before Sitting, Where Does One Stand?
— Chapter Six, the Yoga of Discernment: the support and abode of calm and insight; the four objects

Many ask how to meditate. Few ask where to stand before meditating. Maitreya's first question is exactly that.

Chapter Six of the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, in Xuanzang's Chinese translation, reads in Waken's English rendering:

“You should know that a bodhisattva relies upon, and abides in, the conventional designation of dharmas, together with the vow not to forsake unsurpassed perfect awakening — these as his support and his abode — and so cultivates calm and insight within the Great Vehicle.”

[T16 no. 676, p. 697c16–18]

With Chapter Six, Waken's exposition notes, the sūtra passes from the object contemplated to the practice that contemplates; what the first five chapters set out as view must now become cultivation. Maitreya asks on what a bodhisattva relies and in what he abides. The Buddha names two things: the provisional establishment of the Dharma — the teaching as taught — is the support; the vow not to forsake supreme awakening is the abode. One is teaching, one is vow. Without teaching, calm and insight have no handle; without vow, they stop at the first comfortable place.

Then Maitreya asks about objects. Four are named: the image with discrimination, the image without discrimination, the limit of things, the accomplishment of what is to be done. The Buddha answers: the image without discrimination is the object of calm; the image with discrimination, the object of insight; the last two are objects of both. Calm is the mind settled on an image without discriminating; insight is the mind examining with discrimination upon the image; at the limit of things, all that can be known is encompassed; at accomplishment, the transformation of the basis is complete.

The passage is honest about where practice begins: not with a mysterious experience, but with teaching and with vow. What is set out here is the object and the way of attending; the sūtra draws a further line at “pliancy of body and mind” — attention before pliancy is attained is only “attention conforming to calm,” so a first settling should not yet be called calm and insight attained.

Three places to look: When I sit, is there a support — a teaching I actually hold? Is there an abode — a vow larger than comfort? Is my “insight” discernment upon the teaching, or wandering in my own imagination?

The support and abode cannot be skipped. “Thinking of nothing” is not calm; the sūtra is explicit that even the image without discrimination is still an object.

May we first settle our support and abode, and then speak of sitting down.

Further reading:
waken．org › Translations › Han › Yogācāra › Saṃdhinirmocana › Chapter Six

【讀典札記｜解深密經 11／18】佛說了三次法輪，哪一次才是了義？——〈無自性相品〉三時判教；虛空喻同一位老師，在不同的時候，對不同的學生，會說不一樣的話。這不是前後矛盾，而是次第。勝義生菩薩在這一品的末尾，替整個佛法的教史做了一次領解。唐...
10/20/2026

【讀典札記｜解深密經 11／18】

佛說了三次法輪，哪一次才是了義？
——〈無自性相品〉三時判教；虛空喻

同一位老師，在不同的時候，對不同的學生，會說不一樣的話。這不是前後矛盾，而是次第。勝義生菩薩在這一品的末尾，替整個佛法的教史做了一次領解。

唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈無自性相品〉，勝義生菩薩白佛言：

「於今第三時中，普為發趣一切乘者，依一切法皆無自性、無生、無滅、本來寂靜、自性涅槃、無自性性，以顯了相轉正法輪。第一甚奇、最為希有。」

〔T16 no. 676，p. 697b04–08〕

依 waken．org 義疏，這是後世所謂「三時判教」的經源，但要留意說者與次第：說這話的是勝義生菩薩，是他對佛所說的領解。經文的順序是：佛說三無自性性，勝義生以毘濕縛藥、熟酥、虛空等譬喻領解，佛印可「如是，如是！汝應受持」；然後勝義生才陳述三時，接著問受持此了義教的功德，佛答以功德。所以「如是，如是」印可的是前面的三無性義與譬喻；三時之說，經文既未另加印可，也未否定。初時在鹿野苑，為發趣聲聞乘者以四諦相轉法輪，「是未了義」；第二時為發趣大乘者，依一切法無自性等「以隱密相」轉法輪，「猶未了義」；第三時普為一切乘者，依三無自性性「以顯了相」轉法輪，「是真了義」。

三時的差別，經文說得具體：對機不同（發趣聲聞乘者、發趣大乘者、一切乘者），所依法義不同（四諦相；一切法無自性等；三無自性性），顯隱不同（隱密相、顯了相）。第二時說「一切法無自性」而不解釋密意，容易被誤讀為「無」；第三時把三無自性性說明白了，所以是了義。這就是前兩篇所讀的內容。要留意：這是本經自己的判教框架；後世以此判攝一切佛教的教史，是再往前走的一步。

勝義生在陳述三時之前，用了四個譬喻說這個了義教的作用，最後一個是虛空：「譬如虛空遍一切處，皆同一味，不障一切所作事業。」了義教遍於一切不了義經中，「皆同一味」，也不妨礙聲聞、獨覺、大乘各自所修。

把這一段帶回日常，可以觀察三處：我有沒有把自己早期聽到的一句法，當成佛法的全部？讀到看似相反的兩段經文，我是急著判一個對錯，還是先問各自對誰說、怎麼說？我所理解的「了義」，有沒有像虛空那樣，容得下別人正在修的事業？

三時判教不能拿來排名教派，也不必淡化成「只是說法方式不同」——經文確實判了了義與未了義。它判的是教的顯隱與了不了，不是修行人的高低。

願我們聽到顯了的話，也不輕看隱密的因緣。

延伸閱讀：
waken．org › 譯注 › 漢傳 › 唯識 › 解深密經 › 品五 無自性相品

#讀典札記 #解深密經

Reading the Saṃdhinirmocana · 11/18

The Buddha Turned the Wheel Three Times — Which Teaching Is Definitive?
— Chapter Five, the three turnings; the simile of empty space

The same teacher, at different times, to different students, says different things. That is not contradiction; it is sequence. At the end of this chapter the bodhisattva Born of the Ultimate Meaning offers his understanding of the whole history of the teaching.

In Chapter Five of the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, translated into Chinese by Xuanzang, the bodhisattva Born of the Ultimate Meaning says to the Buddha, in Waken's English rendering:

“Now, in the present, in the third time, universally for those who set forth in every vehicle, in dependence on the doctrine that all dharmas are without intrinsic nature, without arising, without ceasing, quiescent from the very first, by their own nature in nirvāṇa, by the very absence of intrinsic nature, You turn the wheel of the right Dharma by way of a fully explicit mode of expression. This is the foremost marvel, the most rare of all.”

[T16 no. 676, p. 697b04–08]

Waken's exposition identifies this as the scriptural source of the later “three turnings,” with a caution about speaker and sequence. The speaker is the bodhisattva, offering his understanding. The order in the text is: the Buddha teaches the three non-natures; the bodhisattva shows his understanding through similes — a medicine, clarified butter, empty space; the Buddha confirms, “just so, just so — you should uphold it”; only then does the bodhisattva set out the three times, and next asks about the merit of upholding this teaching, which the Buddha answers. So “just so” confirms the three non-natures and the similes before it; the account of the three times the sūtra neither separately confirms nor denies. In the first time, at the Deer Park, for those setting forth in the śrāvaka vehicle, the wheel was turned by the four truths — of provisional meaning. In the second time, for those setting forth in the Great Vehicle, it was turned on the absence of intrinsic nature, but “in a hidden mode” — still provisional. In the third time, for all vehicles, it is turned on the three non-natures “in a fully explicit mode” — of true definitive meaning.

The three differ in specific ways the text names: in audience (those of the śrāvaka vehicle, of the Great Vehicle, of all vehicles), in what the teaching rests on (the four truths; no intrinsic nature and the rest; the three non-natures), and in mode (hidden, explicit). The second turning says “no intrinsic nature” without unfolding the intent, and is easily misread as “nothing.” The third makes the three non-natures explicit, and is therefore definitive. This is what the last two posts read. Note that this is the sūtra's own interpretive frame; using it to chart the whole history of Buddhist teaching is a further step taken later.

Before setting out the three times, the bodhisattva gives four similes for the working of this definitive teaching; the last is empty space, “which pervades all places, is of one and the same savour, and does not hinder any of the works that are done.” The definitive teaching runs through all provisional sūtras, of one taste, hindering none of the practice of śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, or the Great Vehicle.

Three places to look: Have I taken the first teaching I heard for the whole of the Dharma? Meeting two passages that seem opposed, do I rush to judge, or first ask to whom and how each was spoken? Is the “definitive meaning” I hold as spacious as the sky, with room for what others are practising?

The three turnings are not a ranking of schools; nor should they be watered down to “only a difference of delivery” — the sūtra really does judge teachings provisional or definitive. What it judges is how the teaching was spoken and how fully, not how high the practitioner stands.

May we hear the explicit word without despising the hidden conditions.

Further reading:
waken．org › Translations › Han › Yogācāra › Saṃdhinirmocana › Chapter Five

【讀經札記｜觀經・十六觀 16 下輩生想】最後一觀所說的三種人，臨終所憑的都不是一堂作成的觀：是聞、是念、是稱名。三次退讓。第一次：善知識來不及教他讀經，只「為讚大乘十二部經首題名字」——只讀題目。第二次：讀題目還不夠，「智者復教合掌叉手，...
10/20/2026

【讀經札記｜觀經・十六觀 16 下輩生想】

最後一觀所說的三種人，臨終所憑的都不是一堂作成的觀：是聞、是念、是稱名。

三次退讓。第一次：善知識來不及教他讀經，只「為讚大乘十二部經首題名字」——只讀題目。第二次：讀題目還不夠，「智者復教合掌叉手，稱南無阿彌陀佛」。第三次退到了底：「彼人苦逼不遑念佛。」他不是不願念，是痛到念不出來。於是那句話又往下讓了一階：「汝若不能念彼佛者，應稱歸命無量壽佛。」

從觀到聞，從聞到念，從念到稱。一寸一寸降下去，降到再無可降處，那扇門還開著。

「稱佛名故，於念念中，除八十億劫生死之罪。」上兩品算的是一次除多少，這一品算的是一念除多少。欠得最重的那一位，一念之間所銷的反而最多。

「命終之時見金蓮花，猶如日輪，住其人前。」一朵金蓮花，像太陽。第一觀的日輪，在最後一觀回來了。

前十五觀末尾都有正邪之判，這一觀沒有。經收在「是名下輩生想，名第十六觀」就停住了。

日用省察：念不出來，就稱；稱不出來，門還開著。今天若遇到一個念不出來的人——包括自己——記得那句話還可以再降一階。

依 waken.org 白話譯注：「一寸一寸降下去，降到再無可降處，那扇門還開著。」

▸ 中文影片：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F710R7T37WM
▸ English video：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x8uQPbEWtk
▸ 原典・白話・英譯：https://waken.org/translations/han/jingtu/guanjing/16_xiabei_shengxiang/

經：畺良耶舍譯《佛說觀無量壽佛經》（T12n0365）。

#觀經 #下輩生 #稱名 #讀經札記

━━━━━━━━━━

【Sūtra Notes | Contemplation Sūtra 16 · The Lowest Grade】

The three kinds of person in the last contemplation all rely, at the end of life, on something other than a contemplation brought to completion in a single sitting: on hearing, on recollecting, on uttering the Name.

Three concessions. The first: there is no time to teach him the scriptures, and the good friend only "praises for him the title-names at the head of the twelve divisions of the Great Vehicle scriptures" — only the titles. The second: titles are not enough, and "one who is wise then teaches him further to join his palms and fold his hands, and to utter Namo Amitābha Buddha." The third retreats to the floor: "That person, pressed by pain, has no leisure to recollect the Buddha." Not unwilling; the pain is such that it cannot be got out. And so the sentence gives way one step more: "If you cannot recollect that Buddha, you should utter: entrusting my life to the Buddha of Measureless Life."

From contemplating to hearing, from hearing to recollecting, from recollecting to uttering. It comes down inch by inch, and where there is no further to come down, that door is still open.

"Because he utters the Buddha's name, in thought after thought the offences of eighty koṭis of kalpas of birth-and-death are removed." The grades above reckon how much is removed at one stroke; this one reckons how much at a single thought. The one who owes the most has the most dissolved in the space of one thought.

"At the moment of death he sees a golden lotus, like the disc of the sun, standing before him." A golden lotus like the sun. The sun of the first contemplation returns in the last.

Each of the first fifteen contemplations ends with a judgment of right and wrong. The sixteenth has none. It closes at "this is called the image of birth in the lowest grade," and there it stops.

For daily practice: if recollecting is beyond reach, utter; if uttering is beyond reach, the door is still open. When you meet someone today who cannot manage even that — yourself included — remember the sentence can come down one step more.

From the waken.org study edition: "It comes down inch by inch, and where there is no further to come down, that door is still open."

▸ English video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x8uQPbEWtk
▸ 中文影片: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F710R7T37WM
▸ Canonical text · plain reading · English: https://waken.org/translations/han/jingtu/guanjing/16_xiabei_shengxiang/

Sūtra: The Sūtra on Contemplating the Buddha of Measureless Life, tr. Kālayaśas (T12n0365). English quotations follow the waken.org study edition.

【讀典札記｜解深密經 10／18】既然只有一乘，為什麼還分三乘？——〈無自性相品〉一乘密意與種性差別讀大乘經，常會遇到兩句看似相反的話：有時說「唯有一乘」，有時又細分聲聞、獨覺、菩薩三種種性。哪一句是真的？唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈無自性相品〉...
10/19/2026

【讀典札記｜解深密經 10／18】

既然只有一乘，為什麼還分三乘？
——〈無自性相品〉一乘密意與種性差別

讀大乘經，常會遇到兩句看似相反的話：有時說「唯有一乘」，有時又細分聲聞、獨覺、菩薩三種種性。哪一句是真的？

唐玄奘譯《解深密經》〈無自性相品〉說：

「一切聲聞、獨覺、菩薩，皆共此一妙清淨道，皆同此一究竟清淨，更無第二。我依此故，密意說言：『唯有一乘。』」

〔T16 no. 676，p. 695a17–20〕

依 waken．org 義疏，佛在這裡用的仍然是「密意」的講法。一乘，是就道與果說的：無論哪一種種性的有情，都由同一條道、同一行迹，證得無上安隱涅槃，「更無第二」。但經文緊接著補一句：「非於一切有情界中，無有種種有情種性，或鈍根性、或中根性、或利根性有情差別。」一乘不否認差別。依 waken．org 義疏，本段是就三乘所共的清淨之道與究竟清淨，密意說一乘；並不因此抹平三乘種性，也不抹平如來法身功德與二乘解脫身的差別——第十七篇會讀到那一段。

接下來經文談到「一向趣寂」的聲聞種性，說佛「終不能令當坐道場證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」，又談到迴向菩提的聲聞，由如來方便引導，佛「亦異門說為菩薩」。這些段落在後世引起了很多爭論；經文自己的態度，是把種性差別如實記下，而把一乘放在「密意」裡說。

把這一段帶回日常，可以觀察三處：看到有人修行的方式和我不同，我是先判高下，還是先承認根性有別？我對自己的期許，是「同一究竟清淨」，還是「我這種人就這樣了」？「一乘」在我口中，是尊重，還是另一種「只有我這條路對」？

這一段不能被簡化成「人人平等所以沒有差別」，也不能被簡化成「種性是定的所以不必努力」；經文兩邊都說了，兩邊都要讀。

願我們走各自的路，不離同一清淨之道。

延伸閱讀：
waken．org › 譯注 › 漢傳 › 唯識 › 解深密經 › 品五 無自性相品

#讀典札記 #解深密經

Reading the Saṃdhinirmocana · 10/18

If There Is Only One Vehicle, Why Speak of Three?
— Chapter Five, the hidden intent of the One Vehicle and the distinction of lineages

Reading Mahāyāna sūtras one keeps meeting two sentences that seem to pull apart: sometimes “there is but one vehicle,” sometimes a careful division into śrāvaka, pratyekabuddha, and bodhisattva lineages. Which is true?

Chapter Five of the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, in Xuanzang's Chinese translation, reads in Waken's English rendering:

“All śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and bodhisattvas alike share this one wondrous and pure path, and alike come home to this one ultimate purity — there is no second. It is upon this reason that I have, by hidden intent, said: ‘There is but One Vehicle.’”

[T16 no. 676, p. 695a17–20]

Waken's exposition notes that the Buddha is again speaking by “hidden intent.” One Vehicle is said of the path and the fruit: beings of every lineage, by this same path and course, realize the supreme nirvāṇa of ease, and there is no second. But the sūtra immediately adds: this is not to say that within the realm of beings there are no manifold lineages, no beings of dull, middling, or sharp faculties. The One Vehicle does not deny difference. Waken's exposition reads the passage as saying “One Vehicle,” by hidden intent, of the pure path and ultimate purity common to all three vehicles — without flattening the three lineages, and without erasing the difference between the Tathāgata's Dharma-body with its qualities and the liberation-body of the two vehicles, which post 17 will read.

The chapter goes on to speak of śrāvakas who “tend only toward quiescence,” who will not sit at the seat of awakening and realize supreme bodhi, and of śrāvakas who turn toward bodhi, whom the Buddha “by another teaching” calls bodhisattvas. These passages were much debated later. The sūtra's own stance is to record the distinction of lineages as it stands, and to place the One Vehicle within hidden intent.

Three places to look: When someone practises differently from me, do I rank first, or first acknowledge a difference of faculties? Is what I expect of myself “the one ultimate purity,” or “people like me end up like this”? In my mouth, is “One Vehicle” respect — or another way of saying only my road is right?

This passage cannot be flattened into “all are equal, so there is no difference,” nor into “lineage is fixed, so effort is pointless.” The sūtra says both, and both must be read.

May we each walk our own road, without leaving the one pure path.

Further reading:
waken．org › Translations › Han › Yogācāra › Saṃdhinirmocana › Chapter Five

【讀經札記｜觀經・十六觀 15 中輩生想】上輩所憑的是三種心。中輩所憑的是戒——而最後一位，連戒也沒有。「若有眾生受持五戒，持八戒齋，修行諸戒，不造五逆，無眾過惡。」一句觀想沒有，一句誦經也沒有，列的全是戒。戒說完，經隨即轉了一個方向：「以...
10/19/2026

【讀經札記｜觀經・十六觀 15 中輩生想】

上輩所憑的是三種心。中輩所憑的是戒——而最後一位，連戒也沒有。

「若有眾生受持五戒，持八戒齋，修行諸戒，不造五逆，無眾過惡。」一句觀想沒有，一句誦經也沒有，列的全是戒。戒說完，經隨即轉了一個方向：「以此善根，迴向願求生於西方極樂世界。」戒是所修，迴向是所向。少了後面那一步，前面那些不通到那裡去。

「若一日一夜持八戒齋，若一日一夜持沙彌戒，若一日一夜持具足戒，威儀無缺。」三個「若」字並列，任取其一。時間可以短到一日一夜，而在那一日一夜裡，「威儀無缺」四個字沒有降。

「若有善男子、善女人，孝養父母，行世仁義。」戒沒有，經沒有，觀沒有，連想去那裡的念頭也沒有。臨終才第一次聽見這件事——「聞此事已，尋即命終。譬如壯士屈伸臂頃，即生西方極樂世界。」活了一輩子不曾聽過的事，臨終聽了這一遍。

日用省察：一日一夜的戒算數，但那一日一夜要「威儀無缺」。今天給自己一件小事，小到一天就能做完，然後做到沒有缺。

依 waken.org 白話譯注：「他一生走的是哪一條路，最後來接他的就是哪一路人。」

▸ 中文影片：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGg6I9bHmMQ
▸ English video：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znAuM7M3w-Q
▸ 原典・白話・英譯：https://waken.org/translations/han/jingtu/guanjing/15_zhongbei_shengxiang/

經：畺良耶舍譯《佛說觀無量壽佛經》（T12n0365）。

#觀經 #中輩生 #持戒 #讀經札記

━━━━━━━━━━

【Sūtra Notes | Contemplation Sūtra 15 · The Middle Grade】

What the highest grade relied on was three kinds of mind. What the middle grade relies on is the precepts — and the last of them has not even the precepts.

"If there are sentient beings who receive and hold the five precepts, who keep the eight-precept fast, who cultivate the various precepts, who commit none of the five heinous acts and are without faults and evils." Not one line about forming images, not one about reciting scriptures. All precepts. And at once the sūtra turns them in a direction: "With roots of good such as these they dedicate and direct them, vowing to seek birth in the world of Ultimate Bliss in the West." The precepts are what is cultivated; the dedicating is where it is aimed. Without that second step, the first does not run through.

"If for one day and one night they keep the eight-precept fast, or for one day and one night keep the śrāmaṇera precepts, or for one day and one night keep the full precepts, with no defect in deportment." Three ifs; take any one. The time may be as short as one day and one night, and within it, "with no defect in deportment" is not lowered.

"If there are good men or good women who are filial and care for father and mother, and who practise the humaneness and rightness of the world." No precepts, no scriptures, no contemplation, not even the thought of going there. Only at the end does he hear of it — "Having heard of this, he straightway ends his life. As in the time a strong man takes to bend and stretch his arm, he is born in the world of Ultimate Bliss in the West." A thing never heard in a lifetime, heard through this once at the end.

For daily practice: one day and one night of precepts counts, but that day must be without defect. Give yourself one small thing today, small enough to finish in a day, and finish it with no gap.

From the waken.org study edition: "Whichever road a person has walked all his life, that is the company that comes at the end to welcome him."

▸ English video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znAuM7M3w-Q
▸ 中文影片: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGg6I9bHmMQ
▸ Canonical text · plain reading · English: https://waken.org/translations/han/jingtu/guanjing/15_zhongbei_shengxiang/

Sūtra: The Sūtra on Contemplating the Buddha of Measureless Life, tr. Kālayaśas (T12n0365). English quotations follow the waken.org study edition.

Address

El Monte, CA

Telephone

(626)4550077

Website

, ,

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Waken Temple posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Waken Temple:

Shortcuts

Share

Category