06/18/2026
Parashat Korach
Numbers 16:1-18:32
This week's parasha contains what I think might be the most intentionally miss understood passage in the entire Five (or 7) Books of Moses.
In Numbers 16, we read about Korach's challenge to Moses and Aaron's leadership. The way it is generally interpreted is that Korach tried to usurp the authority of God and of those whom God has chosen to be leaders. It's a quick read, so I suggest you do it for yourself. I'm going to explain why I think it is intentionally miss interpreted.
Anyone who reads Numbers 16 is struck by how Korach's challenge to Moses and Aaron seems decidedly reasonable. In effect, they are rebelling against what is plainly a very undemocratic process of choosing leaders. Indeed, in my opinion, that's exactly what they are doing. However, instead of rewarding their commitment to the democratic process and objection to authoritarianism, the Torah describes them as being wicked and deserving punishment.
Why does God react so negatively to Korach's complaint? Because, in my learned opinion, it was the priests who wrote this part of the Bible. They did not want to relinquish any of their authority to Korach or anyone else. What better way to do that than to tell the story so that it was God who was offended by Korah's challenge.
I imagine some of you are rolling your eyes at my suggestion. But consider this, scholars have long since studied the Bible influenced by the documentary hypothesis. The documentary hypothesis argues that the Five Books of Moses, is actually a compilation of four originally independent documents. Four documents, multiple contributors. One of those books, it is argued, was authored by the priests. There are lots of clues throughout the text that supports this theory. You can learn more about documentary hypothesis by clicking here, or find a copy of Who Wrote the Bible, by Richard Friedman and learn even more.
Democracy was and still is a threat to authoritarians and want-to-be authoritarians. Throughout the Torah, these two political philosophies struggle. This conflict is at the heart of this week's parashah.
Postscript: Bart Ehrman, a biblical scholar at UNC, argues that it was not uncommon for political messages to be added to passages included in the Christian Bible, giving them an apparent stamp of divine authority*. This is, perhaps, why despite the priests effort to write off Korach, later biblical contributors reclaimed him. Psalms 42-49 begin by evoking Korach's descendents. And we think misinformation is something new.
Here are two books about the amazing scholarship of Bart Ehrman on "misinformation' in the Christian Bible.
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why
Forgery and Counter Forgery