06/16/2026
In our 39th episode of “Men Who Understood the Times,” we discuss: Can the Supreme Court legislate (im)morality? 1. Roe v Wade/Dobbs – abortion; 2. Obergefell v Hodges – gay “marriage”; 3. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission – refusal of services for LGBTQ+; 4. Chiles v. Salazar – therapists performing “conversion therapy”.
We examine four major Supreme Court cases to discuss what effects these decisions have had on both Christians and unbelievers. How has legalizing abortion normalized an act that Christians consider a sin? How did legalizing gay “marriage” redefine a divinely ordained institution? How did the court uphold the concept that the government cannot force a citizen to say, write, or create something that violates their conscience? How did the court protect a therapist’s right to speak according to their conscience as a vital safeguard against government tyranny?
Find the MWUTT podcast by searching for RWJ Daily in your favorite podcast app. Search for Men Who Understood The Times on YouTube. Please subscribe, like, comment, and share these podcasts and YouTube videos.
And, as a corollary: Should Christians take an interest in the Supreme Court? Continue the conversation with comments or questions: [email protected]