11/29/2025
Ready or Not.
As we enter into Advent, we begin by remembering what Jesus said about the return of the Son in Matthew 24:36-44. Because we do not know when the Son is coming (v. 36), we must be ready (v. 44), even if we carry on as those in the days of Noah (vv. 37-38). From what Christ said to his disciples we see that: (1) we are to remain vigilant (vv. 42-43); and (2) we are to recognize outcomes will be different (vv. 40-41).
The question may arise as to what Jesus was alluding to in Matthew 24:40-41. Why leave it at describing the differing outcomes of those who are ready for his coming and those who are not? (The following will not be detailed this Sunday.)
1. Differing Views on the End Times and Key Texts
Among faithful, Bible-believing Christians there are multiple views on the end times, on the second coming of Christ, and on how to read major passages such as Matthew 24–25, Revelation 20, and 1 Thessalonians 4–5.
The EFCA Statement of Faith, Article 9 affirms the essential truth that “we believe in the personal, bodily and glorious return of our Lord Jesus Christ”, and it deliberately allows for a variety of eschatological viewpoints within that core. However, it does not permit a fully realized (full Preterist) view, which claims that all of Jesus’ prophetic words in Matthew 24 and all of Revelation have already occurred in the first century in such a way that there is no future second coming. Such a denial contradicts the EFCA’s foundational confession of a future, personal return.
Within that boundary, Christians hold several legitimate approaches to interpreting the crucial passages:
1) Futurist (most common in Dispensational eschatology)
Reads most of Matthew 24–25 and Revelation as future events.
Revelation 20’s 1,000 years (the Millennium) is taken literally.
2) Historicist
Sees many details in Revelation as corresponding to events in church history.
3) Idealist
Understands much of Revelation as symbolic, portraying the ongoing spiritual conflict between Christ and evil throughout the church age.
2. The Millennial Views Arising from Revelation 20
Because Revelation 20 describes a 1,000-year reign, different eschatological views arise:
Dispensational, Premillennial, Pre-tribulation
Christ returns before the 1,000 years.
Believers are “raptured” prior to a seven-year tribulation.
Holds to a literal 1,000-year earthly reign.
Historic Premillennialism (Post-tribulation)
Affirms a future Millennium but sees the Church enduring the tribulation.
Supports a reading of Matthew 24 in which Christians experience the tribulation.
Mid-tribulation Premillennialism
Similar to above, but the “rapture” occurs midway through the tribulation.
Passages such as 2 Thessalonians 2:7–12 and Daniel 7:21–25 are often used to argue that believers will see the revealing of the “man of lawlessness” and conflict with oppressive powers before Christ gathers His people.
Postmillennialism
The 1,000 years precede Christ’s return.
The gospel advances powerfully in history, leading to an extended period of blessing before Christ comes.
Amillennialism (Inaugurated Millennial View)
The 1,000 years are symbolic, not literal.
Christ now reigns from heaven; the saints’ reigning in Revelation 20 is heavenly, not earthly.
The apocalyptic battle with Gog and Magog is read symbolically in light of Ezekiel 38–39.
3. Who Is “Taken”?
Matthew 24:40–41 in Comparison with Luke 17:35–37
Premillennial readings often understand Matthew 24:40–41 (“one will be taken and one left”) as referring to the Rapture of believers.
But the text itself is ambiguous. In Luke 17:35–37, those “taken” are associated with a fate clarified by the disciples’ question, “Where, Lord?”—to which Jesus replies, “Where the vultures are gathered.” This suggests judgment, not rescue.
Thus:
Amillennial and Postmillennial interpreters may read Matthew 24:40–41 as describing the final gathering of believers corresponding to 1 Thessalonians 4:16–17, but not as a removal from the world before tribulation.
Rather, believers form a welcome party receiving the returning King, not a church raptured away to wait for a later consummation.
4. Living in Light of Christ’s Return
Despite interpretive differences, Scripture emphasizes the ethical and missional implications of the Lord’s return.
1 Thessalonians 5:9–11 and 5:14–15 call believers to:
live with hope,
encourage and build up one another,
admonish the idle,
comfort the discouraged,
help the weak,
pursue good for all.
This aligns perfectly with the EFCA affirmation:
“The coming of Christ, at a time known only to God, demands constant expectancy and… motivates the believer to godly living, sacrificial service and energetic mission.”
No matter the millennial view, the Church’s unified calling is readiness, holiness, faithfulness, and mission, as we await the personal, bodily, and glorious return of our Lord Jesus Christ.