LOGOS Olongapo

LOGOS Olongapo Church

04/02/2026

The End of the "Airport Aray" Is FINALLY Here (And Why It’s About Time)

Alam mo yung feeling na naka-score ka ng Piso Fare, tapos feeling mo nanalo ka sa lotto?

Pero pagdating sa payment o sa airport, biglang may panira ng mood: The Philippine Travel Tax.

₱1,620 (economy) or ₱2,700 (first class). Just like that.

Parang ang hassle, 'di ba? You worked hard to save on tickets, only to be hit by a fee that feels like a penalty just for leaving the country.

But if House Majority Leader Sandro Marcos gets his way with his newly filed House Bill No. 7443, that era might finally be over.

Here is why this proposal hits different
- and why his rationale behind his proposed bill show he gets the modern Filipino traveler.

1. Real Talk: Travel isn't a "Luxury" Anymore

Yung batas na nag-impose niyan (PD 1183) was signed way back in 1977. Panahon pa ng bell-bottoms 'yun. Back then, air travel was basically for the ultra-rich.

Pero ngayon? Necessity na siya. Rep. Sandro Marcos hit the nail on the head when he said the tax was created in a “very different economic context”.

He emphasized the reality for many of us today:

“Travel is not a luxury for many Filipinos. It is part of how families stay connected and how workers sustain their livelihoods.”

“Today, it has become an added cost that restricts mobility and weighs heavily on ordinary Filipinos who simply want to travel for work, family or opportunity.”

2. The "Family Walang Iwanan" Math

Kung solo flight ka, masakit na sa bulsa ang ₱1,620. Pero paano kung pamilya kayo?
Rep. Sandro broke down the math in his explanatory note, pointing out that:

“At present, the Philippines imposes a fiscal burden on travelers by charging ₱2,700.00 for first-class passage and ₱1,620.00 for economy class. These rates disproportionately affect lower-income households.”

For a family of four, that travel tax may reach ₱6,480.00. Instead of that money vanishing into a tax fund, Rep. Sandro argues:

“This amount could have been allocated to essential household needs or reinvested in the local economy.”

“Lowering the cost of travel allows Filipino families to allocate their money where it matters most.”

3. Why Are We Penalizing Ourselves?

Here’s the frustrating part: We are an outlier. Karamihan ng kapitbahay natin sa ASEAN, nagtanggal na ng similar travel levies. Tayo na lang yata ang naglalagay ng toll gate sa sarili nating citizens.

Rep. Sandro Marcos warned that this policy is actually hurting us:

“Taxation on personal travel and online bookings suppresses demand, dampens tourism growth, and discourages mobility.”

“When travel becomes more expensive, fewer people move, fewer people spend and fewer opportunities circulate through the economy.”

Simple lang ang logic niya:

“A tax that discourages travel also discourages growth. If our neighbors are opening doors and reducing barriers, we should not be holding on to policies that place us at a disadvantage.”

4. Mas Maraming Byahe = Mas Masiglang Ekonomiya

Some might ask, "Sayang naman yung tax revenue, 'di ba?" But Rep. Sandro Marcos argues that removing the tax will actually boost the economy because more people will travel.

“Increased traveler volume will stimulate tourism-dependent sectors, including hotels, transportation services, tour operations, and retail establishments, resulting in broader economic activity and job creation.”

5. A Smarter Way to Fund Projects

Don’t worry about the tourism and culture projects currently funded by the tax (like TIEZA, CHED, and NCCA). The bill doesn't abandon them.

Instead, Rep. Sandro proposes shifting their funding directly to the General Appropriations Act (the national budget). Why is this better? Because public programs should be funded by the state, not by charging passengers a surprise fee at the airport.

He calls this approach "transparent budgeting":

“Public programs should be sustained through transparent budgeting, not through charges that disproportionately affect travelers. This approach ensures continuity of funding while removing an unnecessary burden on the public.”

Why This is a Win for Travelers

It’s rare to see a bill that immediately makes life easier for the average Pinoy. This isn’t just about saving a few thousand pesos; it’s about modernizing our laws to fit the reality of 2026.
It’s time to say goodbye to the "Airport Aray."

Sandro Marcos Gets It. Period.

House Majority Leader Sandro Marcos is proving that true leadership is about breaking barriers. By pushing to abolish the travel tax, he is opening doors for Filipino families and boosting our local economy.

Hindi lang ito simpleng batas dahil ito ay pagmamalasakit. It’s about giving every Filipino the freedom to move without unnecessary burdens.

This is the kind of forward-thinking governance we deserve.

Tara, sama-sama nating suportahan ang pagbabago!

30/01/2026

AN OPEN LETTER TO CONGRESSMAN LEANDRO LEVISTE



Dear Cong. Leandro Leviste,

“De facto Martial Law,” you say.
In fact, but not in name.

Allow us - those who actually lived through Martial Law - to correct the record.
Not as a debate.
Not as a narrative exercise.
But as a REALITY CHECK.

Martial Law was not a mood.
Not a metaphor.
Not a press line used to deflect controversy.

Martial Law was when you did not get to speak - you were seized.
You did not get to explain - you were detained without charges.
You did not get interviews - you got blindfolds.
You did not get critics - you got disappearances.

There were no rebrands then.
No social media threads.
No “let me clarify my position.”

There was only FEAR.

Had President Bongbong Marcos been anything like his father, your voice would have been silenced long before it reached the airwaves.
You would be in a stockade - muzzled, isolated, forgotten.
Or worse.

So please - stop insulting history.

The closest thing this country experienced to de facto Martial Law was not today.
It was under the Duterte regime -

- Tokhang.
- Extrajudicial killings.
- Red-tagging as state policy.
- Fear as governance.
- Silence enforced by death.

Let’s be blunt: Duterte took more Filipino lives than Marcos Sr. ever did.

The only difference?
- Quieter.
- More excuses.
- Total impunity.

Your parents know this.
Your mother lived through Martial Law.

If she taught you anything, it should have been this:
- Oppression is NOT the same as Inconvenience.
- Accountability is NOT Dictatorship.
- And criticism is NOT Tyranny.

When a man born into wealth, access, and immunity cries “Martial Law” the moment he is questioned,
that is not courage.
➖ That is ENTITLEMENT MISTAKING SCRUTINY FOR PERSECUTION.

So if you truly want to redeem your name, here is some unsolicited but necessary advice:

- Learn history - properly.
- Act in good faith.
- Honor contracts.
- Compete on a level playing field.
- Pay your ₱24 billion fine to the government.
- Detach yourself from inherited privilege.
- Your last name is not a feeding bottle - stop sucking from it.

In short:
- Be a man.
- Be accountable.
- Be a public servant.

Because not every challenge to power is tyranny.
Not every investigation is Martial Law.
And not every criticism is oppression.

Sometimes -
You are not being silenced.
You are simply being asked to be ACCOUNTABLE.

Because accountability is not persecution - it is DEMOCRACY working.

Respectfully,
Those who remember what real Martial Law looks like



















30/01/2026
29/01/2026
29/01/2026
26/01/2026
26/01/2026

Indeed, systematic plunder is part of the Duterte legacy. If flood control corruption had gone unnoticed in his time, it could only have been overshadowed by more flagrant cases.

26/01/2026

Sa tama lang Tayo at evidence so true 🤣😂 Blue Ribbon Committee Chairman Ping Lacson, Senate President Tito Sotto and Secretary Jonvic Remulla say that there's no evidence that links former Speaker Martin Romualdez to the flood control scandal.

In fact, the former Speaker faced the ICI investigations. He also voluntarily submitted a 100 page affidavit. And above all, he never left the country making himself available for any other proceedings.

Only the DDS insist that the former Speaker is involved. Why? It's because the DDS have fake news in their DNA.

It's all about hate. The DDS hate him because under his speakership Sara was impeached by the House and the Davao Mafia was brought to light.

Address

Olongapo
2200

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when LOGOS Olongapo posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to LOGOS Olongapo:

Share

Category