My Reaction Videos

My Reaction Videos This page is about my reaction to specific videos about religions, God's words, or any related topic.

this is all about my reaction videos regarding erroneous doctrines of religions.

In this video, we dive into a story that powerfully challenges one of the most popular teachings in modern Christianity:...
29/10/2024

In this video, we dive into a story that powerfully challenges one of the most popular teachings in modern Christianity: the prosperity gospel. If you’ve ever wondered why good people sometimes face suffering, or questioned whether faith really guarantees a life of health, wealth, and success, this message is for you.

https://youtu.be/D4QX4NSL-kQ?si=DPKgWhwHFMpS5CBR

Who is the True God In 1 John 5:20?Follow the link for the exegetical Interpretation.https://www.facebook.com/j2eformed/...
23/05/2024

Who is the True God In 1 John 5:20?
Follow the link for the exegetical Interpretation.
https://www.facebook.com/j2eformed/posts/pfbid031VRi6kuxcf7cRnFYSzHXe4T25gM5VVjcC4uGUor3ApsMvvzNS2PKrwxNyEzW9CcNl

👨‍🏫 Different Views on the Interpretation of 1 John 5:20

1 John 5:20 is a verse in the New Testament that has been the subject of theological debate, particularly regarding whether "the true God" mentioned in the verse refers to Jesus Christ or to God the Father. Here is the verse in question:

"And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true; and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life." (1 John 5:20, ESV)

There are two main interpretations:

1. **Referring to God the Father:**
- Some scholars and theologians interpret "the true God" as referring to God the Father. They argue that the verse distinguishes between "him who is true" (the Father) and "his Son Jesus Christ." In this interpretation, the phrase "he is the true God and eternal life" points back to God the Father. This view is consistent with the broader biblical theme that God the Father is often referred to as "the true God" (e.g., John 17:3).

2. **Referring to Jesus Christ:**
- Other scholars and theologians believe that "the true God" in this verse refers to Jesus Christ. They argue that the immediate antecedent is "Jesus Christ," and thus the phrase "he is the true God and eternal life" directly refers to Jesus. This interpretation is supported by the structure of the sentence and the immediate context, which emphasizes Jesus' role in providing eternal life.

**Arguments for each interpretation:**

- **For God the Father:**
- The phrase "him who is true" is understood to refer to God the Father, consistent with other New Testament references (e.g., John 17:3).
- The distinction between "him who is true" and "his Son Jesus Christ" suggests two distinct persons, making it more natural to read "the true God" as the Father.
- The theological tradition that generally attributes the title "true God" to the Father more frequently than to Jesus.

- **For Jesus Christ:**
- The immediate grammatical antecedent of "he is the true God" is "Jesus Christ."
- The phrase "eternal life" is often associated with Jesus in John's writings (e.g., John 1:4; John 11:25; 1 John 1:2).
- The early Christian confession of Jesus' divine nature aligns with the attribution of the title "true God" to him.

Ultimately, the interpretation can depend on one's theological perspective and the broader context of John's writings. Some Christian traditions emphasize the unity of the Trinity and see no conflict in referring to both the Father and the Son as "true God," while others maintain a distinction in terms of how these titles are applied.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

👨‍🏫 Examining the Greek grammar and context of 1 John 5:20.

In examining the Greek grammar and context of 1 John 5:20, we can gain some insights into whether "the true God" refers to Jesus Christ or to God the Father.

Here is the verse in Greek:

καὶ οἴδαμεν ὅτι ὁ Υἱὸς τοῦ Θεοῦ ἥκει καὶ δέδωκεν ἡμῖν διάνοιαν ἵνα γινώσκωμεν τὸν ἀληθινόν, καὶ ἐσμέν ἐν τῷ ἀληθινῷ, ἐν τῷ Υἱῷ αὐτοῦ Ἰησοῦ Χριστῷ. Οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ ἀληθινὸς Θεὸς καὶ ζωὴ αἰώνιος.

Transliteration:
"kai oidamen hoti ho Huios tou Theou hêkei kai dedôken hêmin dianoian hina ginôskômen ton alêthinon, kai esmen en tôi alêthinôi, en tôi Huiôi autou Iêsou Christôi. houtos estin ho alêthinos Theos kai zôê aiônios."

Breaking down the Greek text:
- "ton alêthinon" (the true one) appears twice: once in reference to "ginôskômen ton alêthinon" (we may know him who is true), and then "en tôi alêthinôi" (in him who is true).
- "houtos" (this one) is a pronoun that can refer to the nearest antecedent.

In this context, "houtos" (this one) could grammatically refer to "Iêsou Christôi" (Jesus Christ), the nearest antecedent. Therefore, from a purely grammatical perspective, the phrase "houtos estin ho alêthinos Theos kai zôê aiônios" (this one is the true God and eternal life) most naturally refers to Jesus Christ.

**Contextual Considerations:**
1. **Immediate Context:**
- The immediate context mentions Jesus Christ as the one who has come and given understanding. The structure of the sentence places Jesus as the subject closest to the pronoun "houtos."

2. **Broader Johannine Context:**
- In the Johannine writings (the Gospel of John and the Johannine epistles), Jesus is often identified with terms like "eternal life" (John 1:4, 11:25, 14:6) and closely associated with the nature and revelation of God.

3. **Early Christian Interpretation:**
- Some early church fathers, such as Irenaeus and Augustine, interpreted this verse as referring to Jesus Christ as the "true God." This suggests an early understanding of the verse in a way that highlights the divinity of Christ.

**Conclusion:**
While there is a theological case for either interpretation, the Greek grammar and immediate context of 1 John 5:20 most naturally support the view that "the true God" refers to Jesus Christ. This aligns with the pronoun "houtos" pointing to the nearest antecedent, "Jesus Christ." However, interpretations can vary based on theological perspectives and broader biblical context.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

👨‍🏫 The Credibility of the Greek Scholars: Irenaeus and Augustine.

Irenaeus and Augustine were influential early Christian theologians, but their backgrounds and primary languages differed, impacting their expertise in Greek.

**Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD):**
- Irenaeus was originally from Asia Minor (modern-day Turkey) and likely spoke Greek as his first language. He later moved to Lyons (in modern-day France), where he became the bishop.
- He wrote primarily in Greek, and his works, such as "Against Heresies" (Adversus Haereses), were originally composed in Greek.
- Given his background and the language of his writings, Irenaeus would have had a solid understanding of Greek.

**Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD):**
- Augustine was born in North Africa (modern-day Algeria) and primarily wrote in Latin.
- He had some knowledge of Greek but was not as proficient in it as he was in Latin. Augustine himself admitted to struggling with Greek in his youth, and most of his theological works were composed in Latin.
- Despite his limited proficiency in Greek, Augustine's theological insights and interpretations were highly influential.

**Conclusion:**
- **Irenaeus** was well-versed in Greek, as it was his primary language and the language of his theological writings.
- **Augustine** had a limited proficiency in Greek and primarily worked in Latin. His theological interpretations were influential, but his insights into Greek texts were not as profound as those of native Greek speakers like Irenaeus.

Thus, while Irenaeus can be considered a Greek scholar, Augustine, although influential, would not be classified as a Greek scholar. However, both contributed significantly to early Christian theology and its interpretation of scriptural texts.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
👨‍🏫 Here is a relevant passage from Irenaeus's "Against Heresies":

English:
"For no one can know the Father, unless through the Word of God, that is, unless by the Son revealing Him; nor can he have knowledge of the Son, unless through the good pleasure of the Father." (Against Heresies, Book IV, Chapter 6, Section 3)

Latin:
"Nemo enim potest cognoscere Patrem, nisi per Verbum Dei, hoc est per Filium eum manifestantem; neque potest cognoscere Filium, nisi per beneplacitum Patris." (Adversus Haereses, Liber IV, Caput VI, Section 3)

((Author's note:
Due to the lack of the original Greek manuscripts for some of Irenaeus's works, the exact Greek text for this particular quote isn't readily available. The primary source material we have is the Latin translation. If the original Greek does exist in some critical editions, it would typically be found in specialized academic collections or critical editions of Irenaeus's works that include Greek fragments.))

This quote demonstrates Irenaeus's belief in the mutual revelation of the Father and the Son, consistent with the interpretation that Jesus, in revealing the Father, is himself "the true God and eternal life.

"Have you seen my latest video on My Reaction Video Live? I dive into the viral claim by Iglesia ni Cristo that only the...
18/05/2024

"Have you seen my latest video on My Reaction Video Live? I dive into the viral claim by Iglesia ni Cristo that only their members can achieve salvation. If you haven't watched it yet, check it out now!"

Go to this link for the replay:

"Welcome back to my live reaction video! Tonight, we're diving into a viral reel that's been making waves, featuring a member of Iglesia Ni Cristo teaching t...

Title: "Pagsasaliksik sa Usapin: Pag-unawa sa mga Tungkulin ng Kababaihan sa Pangangasiwa sa Simbahan sa Pamamagitan ng ...
08/05/2024

Title: "Pagsasaliksik sa Usapin: Pag-unawa sa mga Tungkulin ng Kababaihan sa Pangangasiwa sa Simbahan sa Pamamagitan ng Interpretasyon ng Bibliya"

Title: "Navigating the Controversy: Understanding Women's Roles in Pastoral Ministry through Biblical Interpretation"

The topic of women serving as pastors in the church today remains deeply contentious, often framed as a debate between genders. However, it's crucial to view this issue through the lens of biblical interpretation rather than as a matter of gender discrimination. There are women who firmly believe in the limitations on women's ministry roles as outlined in the Bible, just as there are men who advocate for women serving as pastors without restrictions.

The Scriptures state, “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent” (1 Timothy 2:11–12). According to this perspective, God assigns distinct roles to men and women within the church, reflecting the order of creation and the consequences of sin (1 Timothy 2:13–14). Paul, guided by divine revelation, sets forth these guidelines, restricting women from roles involving teaching or spiritual authority over men. Consequently, this understanding prohibits women from serving as pastors, given the inherent responsibilities of preaching, teaching publicly, and exercising spiritual authority within pastoral roles.

This interpretation encounters several objections, one of which suggests that Paul's restrictions were specific to the women of Ephesus due to the prevailing cultural context. Ephesus was renowned for its temple dedicated to Artemis, where women held authoritative positions in pagan worship. Hence, some argue that Paul aimed to counter these female-led customs, emphasizing a different model for the church. However, the absence of any explicit reference to Artemis or her worship practices in 1 Timothy undermines this theory. Paul's directives in 1 Timothy 2:11–12 are not explicitly linked to local cultural norms but are presented as universal principles applicable beyond the confines of Ephesus.

Despite objections, the biblical structure in 1 Timothy 2:11–14 maintains clarity on the rationale behind restricting women from pastoral roles. Verse 13 provides the basis for Paul's injunctions by referring to the order of creation: "Adam was created first, then Eve." Moreover, verse 14 underscores Eve's deception as an additional reason for these restrictions. This is not to imply women's inherent gullibility but to establish a divine order wherein men are entrusted with primary teaching authority within the church.

Critics often cite examples from the Old and New Testaments, such as Miriam, Deborah, Priscilla, and Phoebe, to challenge this interpretation. While these women played significant roles in God's plan, their experiences do not negate the principles outlined in 1 Timothy 2 regarding pastoral ministry. Instead, they reflect specific contexts and divine appointments outside the normative structure for church leadership.

In conclusion, while women are encouraged to exercise their spiritual gifts in various capacities within the church, including teaching and leadership, the biblical framework reserves positions of pastoral authority for men. This delineation is not indicative of women's inferiority but aligns with God's ordained structure for spiritual leadership. Women are vital contributors to the body of Christ, called to minister effectively within the parameters established by Scripture.

In conclusion, the debate over women serving as pastors in the church is multifaceted and deeply rooted in differing interpretations of scripture. While some advocate for a strict adherence to biblical guidelines that restrict women from pastoral roles, others argue for a more inclusive approach that recognizes women's capabilities and callings. Throughout history, this debate has sparked impassioned discussions and theological reflection, yet consensus remains elusive.

Regardless of one's stance on this issue, it's essential to approach it with humility, recognizing the complexities involved and the diverse perspectives held within the body of Christ. As we engage in dialogue and study, let us prioritize love, mutual respect, and a commitment to seeking God's truth above all else.

Ultimately, whether women serve as pastors or not, their contributions to the church are invaluable. They are called to minister, teach, lead, and serve alongside their male counterparts, utilizing their God-given gifts for the edification of the body of Christ. While humbly submitting to the orders design by God. For God is not the God of disorders.

TAGALOG version:

Title: "Pagsasaliksik sa Usapin: Pag-unawa sa mga Tungkulin ng Kababaihan sa Pangangasiwa sa Simbahan sa Pamamagitan ng Interpretasyon ng Bibliya"

Ang usapin ng mga kababaihang naglilingkod bilang mga pastor sa simbahan sa kasalukuyan ay nananatiling malalim na debate, kadalasang inilalarawan bilang isang usapin sa pagitan ng mga kasarian.
Gayunpaman, mahalagang tingnan ang isyung ito sa pamamagitan ng tamang interpretasyon sa Bibliya kaysa sa isang usapin ng diskriminasyon sa kasarian.
May mga kababaihan na mariin na naniniwala sa mga limitasyon sa mga tungkulin sa ministeryo ng mga kababaihan tulad ng nakalista sa Bibliya, gayundin ang mga lalaki na nagtutulak para sa mga kababaihang naglilingkod bilang mga pastor nang walang mga hadlang.

Sinasabi ng Kasulatan, "Ang babae ay dapat mag-aral sa katahimikan at buong pagsuko. Hindi ko pinapahintulutan ang isang babae na magturo o magkaroon ng awtoridad sa lalaki; dapat siyang tahimik" (1 Timoteo 2:11–12).
Ayon sa pananaw na ito, itinatalaga ng Diyos ang mga iba't ibang tungkulin sa mga lalaki at kababaihan sa loob ng simbahan, na sumasalamin sa kaayusan ng paglikha at sa mga bunga ng kasalanan (1 Timoteo 2:13–14).
Tinutukoy ni Pablo, ang mga gabay na ito, na nagbabawal sa mga kababaihan mula sa mga tungkuling kasama ang espiritwal na awtoridad sa mga lalaki.
Dahil dito, pinipigilan ng pang-unawa na ito ang mga kababaihan mula sa paglilingkod bilang mga pastor, dahil sa mga likas na responsibilidad ng pangangaral, pagtuturo sa publiko, at pagsasagawa ng espiritwal na awtoridad sa loob ng mga tungkuling pastoral.

Nakakatagpo ng ilang mga pagtutol ang interpretasyong ito, kabilang na ang paniwalang ang mga paghihigpit ni Pablo ay partikular sa mga kababaihan ng Efeso dahil sa umiiral na kontekstong kultural. Kilala ang Efeso sa kanyang templo na kultong Artemis, kung saan nagtataglay ng awtoridad ang mga kababaihan sa pagsamba sa diyosang pagano.
Kaya, sinasabing nilayon ni Pablo na labanan ang mga kaugalian ng mga kababaihan sa paglilingkod, na nagpapalakas ng isang ibang modelo para sa simbahan.
Gayunpaman, ang kakulangan ng anumang malinaw na pagkahayag sa Artemis o sa kanyang mga gawi sa pagsamba sa 1 Timoteo ay kontra sa teoryang ito.
Ang mga direksiyon ni Pablo sa 1 Timoteo 2:11–12 ay hindi eksplisit na kaugnay ng mga lokal na kaugalian sa kultura kundi ipinapakita bilang mga unibersal na prinsipyo na naaangkop sa labas ng mga hangganan ng Efeso.

Sa kabila ng mga pagtutol, pinapanatili ng istruktura sa Bibliya sa 1 Timoteo 2:11–14 ang kalinawan sa mga batayan sa likuran ng mga kababaihan mula sa mga tungkuling pastoral.
Binibigyang-katwiran ng talata 13 ang mga batayan para sa mga direktiba ni Pablo sa pamamagitan ng pagtukoy sa kaayusan ng paglikha: "Si Adan ay nilikha muna, saka si Eba." Bukod dito, ipinapakita ng talata 14 ang pagpapahalaga sa panloloko kay Eba bilang karagdagang dahilan para sa mga paghihigpit na ito. Hindi ito upang ipahiwatig ang kahinaan ng kababaihan kundi upang itatag ang isang banal na kaayusan kung saan ipinagkakatiwala sa mga lalaki ang pangunahing awtoridad sa pagtuturo sa loob ng simbahan.

Madalas na binabanggit ng mga kritiko ang mga halimbawa mula sa Lumang at Bagong Tipan, tulad nina Miriam, Deborah, Priscilla, at Phoebe, upang hamunin ang interpretasyong ito. Bagaman ang mga kababaihang ito ay naglaro ng mahalagang papel sa plano ng Diyos, hindi nito nililihis ang mga simulain na nakalista sa 1 Timoteo 2 tungkol sa ministeryong pastoral. Sa halip, nagpapakita ito ng mga tiyak na konteksto at mga ordinasyong pang-diyos sa labas ng pangkaraniwang estruktura para sa pamumuno sa simbahan.

Sa konklusyon, bagaman hinihikayat ang mga kababaihan na gamitin ang kanilang espirituwal na mga kaloob sa iba't ibang kapasidad sa loob ng simbahan, kabilang ang pagtuturo at pamumuno, inilalaan ng istrukturang Biblika ang mga posisyong may awtoridad sa pangangasiwa para sa mga lalaki lamang.
Ang pagkakagulong ito ay hindi nagpapahiwatig ng kahinaan ng mga kababaihan kundi sumasalamin sa itinakdang kaayusan ng Diyos para sa espirituwal na pamumuno.
Mahalagang mga kontribyutor ang mga kababaihan sa katawan ni Cristo, tinatawag na maglingkod nang epektibo sa loob ng mga pamantayan na itinakda ng Bibliya.

Sa pagtatapos, ang usapin sa paglilingkod ng mga kababaihan bilang mga pastor sa simbahan ay may maraming aspeto at malalim na nakatanim sa iba't ibang interpretasyon ng mga kasulatan. Samantalang ang ilan ay nagtutol para sa isang mahigpit na pagsunod sa mga gabay ng Bibliya na nagbabawal sa mga kababaihan mula sa mga tungkuling pastoral, ang iba naman ay nagtatanggol sa isang mas maluwag na paraan na kinikilala ang kakayahan at mga tawag ng mga kababaihan. Sa buong kasaysayan, ang usapin na ito ay nagtulak ng mga mainit na pag-uusap at teolohikal na pagmumuni-muni, ngunit ang isang payakang kasunduan ay nananatiling mahirap abutin.

Anuman ang posisyon ng sinuman sa usaping ito, mahalaga na itong lapitan nang may kababaang-loob, na kinikilala ang kumplikasyon na kasama at ang iba't ibang pananaw na hawak sa loob ng katawan ni Kristo. Habang nakikisangkot tayo sa diyalogo at pagaaral, bigyang prayoridad natin ang pagmamahal, ang pantay-pantay na paggalang, at ang pangako na paghahanap ng katotohanan ng Diyos sa lahat ng bagay.

Sa bandang huli, kahit na ang mga kababaihan ay naglilingkod bilang mga pastor o hindi, ang kanilang mga kontribusyon sa simbahan ay hindi mapapantayan. Sila ay tinatawag na maglingkod, magturo, mamuno, at maglingkod kasama ang kanilang mga kapwa lalaki, gamit ang kanilang mga biyayang ibinigay ng Diyos para sa pagpapalakas ng katawan ni Kristo. Habang nagpapaalab sa mga utos na itinakda ng Diyos. Sapagkat ang Diyos ay hindi ang Diyos ng kaguluhan.

*Invitation: Weekly Bible Study Online via Zoom (9:30 pm)*To join, just click the invitation link below Dear Friends,You...
03/05/2024

*Invitation: Weekly Bible Study Online via Zoom (9:30 pm)*
To join, just click the invitation link below

Dear Friends,
You are cordially invited to join our Weekly Bible Study Online, where we delve into the depths of Scripture to enrich our understanding and grow together in faith. Our study sessions will be conducted via the Zoom platform.
*Subjects:*
1. *Soteriology:*
- Basic Principles
- Advanced Theological Insights
2. *Hermeneutics:*
- Understanding Bible Interpretation
- How to Interpret Scripture in a Theological way?
3. *Ministerial Leadership Training*
- Practical Ministry training.
- How to know your calling?
- Getting involve (Actual Ministry)

NOTE: We will give Certificate of Accomplishment/ Completion to every completed course.
*Schedule:* Every Saturday
*Time:* 9:15 PM (UTC)

To maintain the integrity and security of our study group, there will be a password required to join the Zoom meeting. Please PM me for the password.
We look forward to your participation and meaningful discussions as we journey through these enriching subjects together.
Warm regards,
Ptr. Ramil Delos Reyes

Details:
Topic: TLYM Weekly Bible Study
Time: Apr 13, 2024 09:00 PM Singapore
Every week on Sat, until May 18, 2024, 6 occurrence(s)
Apr 13, 2024 09:30 PM
Apr 20, 2024 09:30 PM
Apr 27, 2024 09:30 PM
May 4, 2024 09:30 PM
May 11, 2024 09:30 PM
May 18, 2024 09:30 PM

Join Zoom Meeting | Invitation link: CLICK this link to join
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84317323257?pwd=9xEQw6G8iyiuvk5Tirj9sQb3NySSpc.1

Meeting ID: 843 1732 3257
Passcode: tlym (tentative)

Visit our site: https://j2eformed.com/

"Welcome back to another exciting episode of My Reaction Video Live! Tonight, I'm diving into a hot topic that's been bu...
09/02/2024

"Welcome back to another exciting episode of My Reaction Video Live! Tonight, I'm diving into a hot topic that's been buzzing around: Senator Robin Padilla's intriguing take on leadership and lawmaking. He argues that it's not about being the smartest in the room, but something else entirely. What could this mean for the future of our laws and amendments? Join me live at 10 pm right here on my YouTube channel as we unpack this thought-provoking discussion. Don't miss out – your insights are invaluable! See you there!"

Go to this link for the live stream:
https://youtube.com/live/O-IkGSWu22I?feature=share

05/02/2024

""Welcome to another exciting episode of 'Usapang Bibliya'! Tonight, we dive deep into the profound topic of Baptism – a journey that promises insights, clar...

"But what does the Bible really teach? Does the power of our words truly influence outcomes? Can we make things happen b...
07/01/2024

"But what does the Bible really teach? Does the power of our words truly influence outcomes? Can we make things happen by what we say? Find out the answers by joining me this Wednesday at 9 pm on my YouTube program 'Usapang Bibliya.' Follow the link in the comment box for the live stream. See you there!"

"In the upcoming episode of 'Usapang Bibliya,' I'll delve into the intriguing realm of 'Positive Confessions Theology.' This teaching advocates the power of ...

Address

Brgy Fairview
Baguio City
2600

Telephone

+639253957723

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when My Reaction Videos posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share