Fruit Bearers Evangelicals

Fruit Bearers Evangelicals Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Fruit Bearers Evangelicals, Religious organisation, Yola.

Fruit Bearers Evangelicals is a spiritual citadel fraught with the spiritual onus of dispensing the knowledge of the True Light to the end that the hearts of all men will be illumined by the incandescence of this light.

True christianity also implies keeping a pure conscience.
25/02/2025

True christianity also implies keeping a pure conscience.

Don't discriminate among those who come to Jesus, for Jesus receives all who come to Him through your life.
27/12/2024

Don't discriminate among those who come to Jesus, for Jesus receives all who come to Him through your life.

Favour does not always guarantee ease, but God's pleasure.
26/12/2024

Favour does not always guarantee ease, but God's pleasure.

Dead Works Vs Good Works
20/10/2024

Dead Works Vs Good Works

You can learn to please God
26/09/2024

You can learn to please God

19/08/2024

A LYING SPIRIT FROM THE PRESENCE OF GOD?

Part (1 of 2)
In 1 Kings 22:19-24, there is a disturbing narrative in which God used a lying spirit to deceive Ahab through his false prophets.
Yes, we could conclude that they were not prophets of God for the following reasons:
1. From Jehoshaphat's statement of dissatisfaction, “Is there not another prophet of the Lord here whom we may ask?”.
2. In verse 24, these acclaimed prophets antagonized a true prophet of God — Micaiah
3. These prophets were deceived by a lying spirit. A true prophet like Micaiah knew better.
4. These prophets despite Ahab's unrepentant wickedness, never fell out of favour with him. A true prophet like Micaiah will never remain likable by a wickedly unrepentant ruler.

Now, the scriptures account, "Ahab also made the Asherah. Ahab did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel than all the kings of Israel who were before him.
1 Kings 16:33

Thus, Ahab was morally culpable, and deserving of God's just punishment for his sins. He was unrepentant even after the great Carmel contest between Elijah and the prophets of Baal. The question now is:
Why would God use such a means— lying spirits to do His bidding?
To be continued...

Goodluck Oraegbune



19/06/2024


QUESTION: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE "KINGDOM OF GOD " AND THE "KINGDOM OF HEAVEN"

NB. A lengthy theological perspective.
Answer:

Answer:
The phrases, "the kingdom of God" and "Kingdom of Heaven" are two phrases employed in scriptures as the message of Jesus Christ.
The word translated “kingdom” is the Greek word "basileia", which means “the realm/domain in which a king rules.”

Throughout the New Testament, the word kingdom consistently makes reference to the rule/dominion of Christ in the hearts of believers, and a future messianic dispensation of the rule/dominion of God over the nations of this world.

I would love to attempt an answer to this question by presenting two schools of thought worth your consideration. Then present a perspective on which I think is more plausible and why.

FIRST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT:
According to this school of thought, the phrases "Kingdom of God" and "Kingdom of Heaven" are references to the same reality.
​The phrase “kingdom of God” occurs 68 times in 10 different New Testament books, while “kingdom of heaven” occurs only 32 times, and only in the Gospel of Matthew.

Let's look at a strong argument for this school of thought.
Speaking to the rich young ruler, Jesus Christ uses “kingdom of heaven” and “kingdom of God” interchangeably.
“Then Jesus said to his disciples, ‘I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven’” (Matthew 19:23).
In the very next verse, Christ proclaims, “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (verse 24).
Conceptually, Jesus makes no distinction between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of heaven but seems to consider them synonymous.

Also, Mark and Luke frequently used “kingdom of God” whereas Matthew used “kingdom of heaven” in parallel accounts of the same parable.
Compare:
👉Matthew 11:11-12 with Luke 7:28
👉Matthew 13:11 with Mark 4:11 and Luke 8:10
👉Matthew 13:24 with Mark 4:26
👉Matthew 13:31 with Mark 4:30 and Luke 13:18;
👉Matthew 13:33 with Luke 13:20
👉Matthew 18:3 with Mark 10:14 and Luke 18:16
👉Matthew 22:2 with Luke 13:29

In each instance, Matthew used the phrase “kingdom of heaven” while Mark and/or Luke used “kingdom of God.”

The above juxtapositions, clearly show that the Bible authors referred to the same reality when they wrote of the "Kingdom of God" and the "Kingdom of Heaven".

SECOND SCHOOL OF THOUGHT:
According to this group, there exists a dichotomy between the two phrases. They claim that given Matthew’s exclusive use of the phrase "Kingdom of Heaven" and the Jewish audience of his Gospel, some interpreters have concluded that Matthew was writing concerning the coming millennial kingdom while the other New Testament authors were referring to God's universal kingdom —throughout all times and His rule in the hearts of men.

The Kingdom of God seems to be universal, and includes God’s reign over all people, including angels, the church, and those in the Old and New Testament, while the Kingdom of Heaven seems to be a Messianic term that refers to the coming Kingdom.

The Kingdom of God can only be entered by the new birth (John 3:3;5-7), while the Kingdom of Heaven is entered by the coming rule of Jesus Christ on earth. According to this school of thought, the Kingdom of Heaven is futuristic while the Kingdom of God both was and also now is

The Kingdom of God does not “come outwardly” (Luke 17:20), but is an inward and spiritual rule (Rom. 14:17), while the Kingdom of Heaven is an outward rule whereby Jesus Christ will put “all things under His feet,” and He shall “deliver the kingdom to God the Father,” (1 Cor. 15:24-28).

Conclusion:
Given the strength of the arguments presented by both schools of thought, I find the first school of thought to be more plausible than the second, and concerning the nuances implied by the second school of thought, I think that:

1. The kingdom of Heaven —coming messianic reign— will also be God's universal rule over the church, all people and all nations.
2. Being born again —coming into the Kingdom of God— is also the means by which a person is granted an entrance into the kingdom of Heaven. Belonging to the kingdom of God, is secured citizenship in the Messianic reign of Christ. So, by implication, the kingdom of heaven is the kingdom of God.

It is also plausible that the term "Kingdom of Heaven" being recorded in Matthew's account of the gospel is a best-fit for the cultural-historical understanding of the gospel of the kingdom of God by his Jewish audience. Thus, not necessarily a reference to a distinct reality from the "kingdom of God"

Goodluck Oraegbune Theapologeticchristian
Chief Scribe,
Fruit Bearers Evangelicals

We're not good enough to be saved!
17/06/2024

We're not good enough to be saved!

Address

Yola

Telephone

+2349038322367

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Fruit Bearers Evangelicals posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Fruit Bearers Evangelicals:

Share