Fr Ugwu Vitus

Fr Ugwu Vitus This page will be used to preach Christ Jesus and answers burning questions about him and his Church.

17/09/2025

Myth or Fact?

One of my uncles died at Okpuje in early 90s. The custom then was that he would be taken back to Obukpa, his ancestral home, for burial. There were two major means of conveying co**ses from place to place then, namely, on head or in van. The dead was bathed and wrapped in his local bed called Okpukpo. Then, two able-bodied men of equal heights, one at the head region and the other at the feet, would lift it on their heads while others accompany them with morale-boosting songs. They walk and run as the spirit of the songs or dry gin determined. When they get tired, they were replaced by another set. That was the oldest and commonest method of transporting co**ses until early 90s when the use of van crept in.

My uncle died during the transition period from carrying co**ses on head to carrying them in pickup, Dazun or Dyna. He died at Epe in Okpuje and a pickup van was called to transport his remains to our ancestral home in Obukpa. I can still visualize how he was carried to the pickup amidst paroxysms of howling cry. But my interest today is what we were told happened on the way to Obukpa.

We received report that during the transfer of his co**se, the vehicle broke down several times between Okpuje and Obukpa. What amazed many was that the driver who saw but the wrapped co**se in the bodybag started giving the accurate description of the dead man---detailing his height, looks and size and revealing that he was repeatedly doublecrossing the road leading to the breakdown of the vehicle. His description of the physical outlook of my uncle perfectly matched all we knew about him yet the driver never saw him alive or even before he was folded in his Okpukpo.

After my relatives in the vehicle confirmed the description of the person seen by the driver as the dead man he was carrying, the driver stopped the vehicle and alighted. He then mentioned the name of my late uncle, rebuked and at the same time pleaded with him to accept to go home. He made some incantations and hopped back into his van. From then onward, the vehicle never developed any fault until they reached Obukpa.

Do people really see the dead? Let me hear your experience or thought on this question.

07/07/2025

When politicians are desperate for power, they sacrifice anything and anybody. This inordinate desperation may lead APC to enter a pact with Atiku promising him to take over power from Tinub in 2031. The same desperation may make Atiku fall for the promise and work in ADC with the covert intent to destabilize it like Wike had done to PDP.

Until you see the Presidential candidate of the Coalition party, don't celebrate yet.

26/11/2024

Why Do Catholic Priests Eat the Chickens Brought To The Church Alone?

Someone who is drowning, as they say, clutches at anything. Those who leave the Church today seek to justify their decision by holding on anything they can reach. One of such hinge reasons for leaving the Church is that material gifts given in the Church is consumed only by the priests while in African Tradition Religion (ATR), the Priest (Atama) and the presenter of the sacrifice jointly partake in the eating of the sacrificial victim. So, when they want to insult the Christian faith, they resort to calling Christians the cheated ones (ndi eriri eri) based on the above insignificant reason. For the sake of the weak and vulnerable, let us explore below why material gifts are used differently in ATR and Catholic Church.

There is nothing we can give in the Church as sacrificial victims. There is only one Victim in Christianity who made one unrepeatable and completely satisfying sacrifice for the entire human race in all generation. So, our gifts in the Church are not to be seen as sacrificial victims. They are rather freewill offerings where we attempt to donate what we have for the course of God who gave us everything. God needs nothing as God because the Lord’s is the earth and the fullness thereof. But his Church is in constant need and whatever is done for the Church redounds to his honour . Our gifts/offerings in Church are not meant to appease God because appeasement has already been done by the blood of the Lamb. Giving in in African Traditional Religion (ATR), on the other hand, has full sacrificial intent. They sacrifice animals before shrines that the blood may atone for them, appease the god, satiate disgruntled spirits, lobby their way etc. No one makes this sacrifice and stands aloof. That is why one who makes the sacrifice must go the whole hug and eat the victim. In most cases, this eating of the sacrificial victim is a condition for the effectiveness of the sacrifice because it is believed that there is an exchange between the god and the consumers in the process. It comes close to the same reason we consume Holy Communion in Christianity. As goat, chickens, rams etc are not our victims as Christians, we may not eat them when we give them in the Church. But as they are the true victims for adherents of ATR, they need to take part in the meal just like we take part in our true meal, Jesus Christ in the Holy Communion.

Giving in the Church is a free act of faith, love and hope, but giving in idolatry is motivated mainly by fear and dictate of a diviner. Christians freely come with gifts to the Church as act of love and trust in God. Catholic priests do not prescribe to the faithful the items to come with for their prayers to be heard. Instead, giving in Christianity is mostly thanksgiving for occasions that unbelievers may regard as awkward sometimes. For example, coming with gifts to the Church after burial. In virtually all instance, Christians voluntarily decide when to give, what to give, where to give, how to give, whether to give or not according to their faith, hope and love quotient. On the contrary, giving by adherent of ATR is no act of faith, hope or love. It is rather decreed by the gods and dictated by their viceroys with threats that will follow non-compliance. It is mostly a joyless sacrifice either to appease the god, to fulfil a promise made under duress or desperation, or for worshipper to bribe his way through the god etc. Because the giver in ATR is often subtly threatened into doing so, and handed the list of items to bring, it is natural that he partakes of the sacrifice as a way of testifying that no harm lurks beneath those items forcefully taken from him. He joins to eat to show that whoever eats it is safe from harm. You will recall that after the gods, the palm wine brought for offering is first served the person who brought it for sacrifice even before the Atama will drink. This suspicion is real among idol-worshipper but not among Christians. Thus, eating with the priests of deities is a safety valve from mutual distrust.

For us Catholics, our gift is somewhat our holocaust burnt entirely unto God. Christians sacrifice something, goat, fowls, ram etc as gifts given in view of total charity to the poor, in support of God-driven mission and missionaries. Thus, they do not look back to what they have given in order to get a share; instead, they hope that their gifts may make them (in)direct participants in the work of the mission. They are fed when their gifts help the poor to feed; they are fed when their gifts help the priests to be fed and be more efficient in their ministry; they are satisfied when their gifts contribute to the enhancement of the Church’s mission, etc. They know something their counterparts in ATR do not know. Thus, they do it for their priests because of their God. The one who gives in our Church is often in need, nevertheless, he feels obliged to support the needs of the Church as a member of the family. On the contrary, the orientation of those in ATR is different. The idol they worship has no mission mandate outside the shrine or stomachs of the worshippers. Therefore, there is no need to support its missionaries that are non-existent. The worshippers understood that there is no obligation imposed on them to spend material gifts in order to promote belief in their idol beyond themselves. That is why when they bring any gift, they do not hope that it will be spent in serving another person other than themselves. They have no teaching on charity to the poor, no obligation to feed their priests, and no reason to propagate their idol like Christians do. Thus, traditional priests consume their sacrificial victims with the worshippers because their worship is self-centered and not wired to serve others or promote the common good.

ATR is a consumerist religion. It is largely built around eating and drinking more than teaching and evangelization. Those who convert to it are raised to look for what to eat and drink, but Christians are raised to look for what sacrifices they can perform in order to help the course of evangelization. Thus, adherents of ATR will be content with staying under a tree and eating beef, goat meat, muttons, and drinking to stupor from what they sacrificed unto themselves in the name of the gods. But Christians may do none of these from what they offered. No! They go home sober while their priests use them judiciously to meet the missionary needs of the Church, help the poor and feed himself in readiness for the Church’s mission. Catholic priests live solely on what God provides them through his believers, and when he receives that, he reciprocates by giving himself entirely and unreservedly for the work of God. Priesthood is their sole function, and if they do another work, it is still for the sake of their priestly ministry. Catholic priests belong to the Church and not the other way round. Thus, taking care of them is obligatory on the side of the Church as a labourer deserves his wages. Gifts made over to God in Church are ways of sustaining the priests and promoting the mission of the Church. That is not so with priests of ATR. The latter own themselves even though they work for the gods. In other words, they are at liberty to fend for themselves.

When you see Churches, Cathedrals, schools, hospitals, banks, etc springing with Catholic Church and none of such from the shrines of ATR, the secret is that Christians give for the sake of these and not for self-serving goal. As Christians, we choose to take care of our priests with our gifts thereby encouraging them to focus in taking care of the needs of our souls. We do not come to Church to spy for material things offered to God. Instead, we understand that God provides for his Church through us—the poor and the rich alike—who only give from what they have received. Our Christian faith has given us foresight such that our gaze is not on the visible things we give, but on the invisible things we will receive. That is why those who have not received the gift of faith can hardly make a gift in the Church. Catholic Priests do not receive offerings unto themselves. People give because of Jesus Christ and his course which priests represent. 'They are maintained by gifts because they live to prepare men for the greater Gift—God himself. If they make men open to God, then, they may be maintained by the gifts of the beneficiaries' says Thomas Aquinas. They eat not alone, but for the sake of the Church and with the rest of men.

04/11/2024

Beggars Too Are Givers

'Once a beggar came to Mother Teresa and said, Everybody is giving you something. l also want to give you something." And he offered her a ten-paisa coin. Mother Teresa thought to herself: "If l accept the money, he would go hungry, but if l don't, he would be unhappy." So, she accepted it. She later said: "I felt within me, that this gift was greater than the Nobel Prize because he gave all that he had. I could see in his face the joy of giving."'

John Rose, Sunday Homilies, Cycle --B,( 32nd Sunday of the Year).

Giving in religious circle is spoilt by two extremes in Nigeria: those who use the Bible to extort by twisting it to their own favour; others who want to sympathize with the victims of the extortion by twisting the bible against gifts from the poor. The greater victim in all this is the harmless Bible that is used as a tool by both extremists.

30/10/2024

Dear friends, l have long reached the Facebook friend limit of 5000. It means that l can no longer accept friend request. So, to the 588 friends and more who are making Facebook friendship request on my Facebook profile, please follow me here, and l promise you will get my post whenever l make it. Thank you for you encouragement.

30/10/2024

Some parents are not parents at all

I have observed that to build a house, we look for a formally trained Engineer, to look after flowers, we employ formally trained florist, to teach in our public schools, one has to present a verifiable school certificate etc. We look for experts in so little a thing as tending to flowers. But what certificate qualifies one as a parent? Do not be quick to answer marriage certificates for no one gets Engineering certificate after three months, for instance. It takes at least four years to become a qualified Engineer with the right to build houses or roads. But building houses or roads, taking care of flowers and even teaching in our public schools, as important as they are, are not to be compared with raising children by parents in our society. This is because parents lay the foundation of who a child becomes in a society ('building' children is more important than building houses or roads) and if the foundation is faulty, the superstructure will be faulty too. How then do we insist on qualified Engineers building our private and public facilities but we go into marriage as quacks or sponsor quacks to raise our children; how come we spend fortune to train ourselves or be trained as qualified Engineers, but we spend nothing in getting formal training for raising children? How come we flaunt and require certificates in the minutest aspects of our lives and our world, but no formal certificates are required for raising of children? We know and we insist that our children go to approved schools and learn at the feet of certified teachers, but we seem not to think that our unborn children should only come to approved homes and certified parents. Thus, there are more irresponsible parents out there than responsible parents, and where we have responsible parents at all, it is mostly as a result of luck. Is it not absurd that we do not leave the growing of flowers to fate, but we leave the raising of human beings to brute chance?

I think that parenting should be a compulsory course done from our senior Secondary schools to General Studies in our universities . As a matter of fact, our undergraduates should not graduate without a good grade in parenting. Besides, parenting school has to be established, backed by laws, and intended couples should be bound to go through it and obtain good grades before being allowed to raise children. Those who are already parents should be required to go for remedial course in parenting. Childbearing is a nature's gift( even imbecile can give birth), but parenting is our gift back to nature; intentional parenting skills are man's ways of nurturing nature's undifferentiated gift to suit his needs in society.

Not everybody who has the capacity to give birth to children should be allowed to do so except the person has the license from approved parenting school. Leaving parenting to informal education or to marriage course is now a dangerous decision as we can see that many irresponsible parents are transmitting their irresponsibilty to their impressionable children and others marry without marriage course.

Newly born children are like stem cells that are undifferentiated. Parenting greatly helps in making them different from brutes. I

22/10/2024

Ekwensudinjo, Ekwensu-bu-onye iro, Ekwensu-ajoka, Chukwukekwensu, Chukwumerirekwensu; onwudinjo, onwudiwe, onwuameze, onwura, etc are drived from Ekwensu and onwu without any dimunition of goodness or approbation of evil. Such names as above are not names meant to worship Ekwensu or onwu, but names that either deny them some power by asserting what they are not (inversely saying something about God as the Alternative) or saying something which they are in order to deter people from association with them.

Besides, some names that came from the ancient time inavariably drove from the Roman gods just as most names today are Chukwu-related. One of the wisest things earlier Christians did was to replace gods with God in the significations of such names. It was not necessary to invent new and different language for Christians; instead, it sufficed that Christians have a different meaning to originally pagan names and words. For instance, Sunday, Thursday etc are derived from Roman gods (Sun-god and god of thunder), but Christians retained the names without retaining their meanings. The names of the days of the week are either simply descriptive /differentiating or they have a new meaning injected into them altogether. For instance, Sunday is not seen as the day of the son god, but as the day of the Son of Righteousness.

Thus, where a name comes from does not mean that there it remains. Wettgenstein made it clear that language is a property of the community of users and that it develops. It means that meaning changes as a community and its language develops together. A proof that language grows is even the word Ekwensu in Igbo language. It originally meant a god of war, but this meaning has been overtaken today as Ekwensu simply means evil nowadays. Thus, names that once gave glory to gods are now giving glory to God by the implicit agreement of language owners/users. That is why we do not hear Maris today and confuse it with Mars and so on.

I do not think that leaders should constitute themselves as instruments of confusion.

21/10/2024

Soon, very soon, rogue pastors will be forced to gradually abandon their habit of cheating their gullible members. They will pretend to repent from their money-driven ministry; act like they care for the long cheated members, and begin to counsel their fellow rogues to halt the cheat. This shift will be gradual or sudden depending on the constitution of the rogue involved. However it happens, note this: there is no genuine repentance from extortion except there is restitution.

18/10/2024

Should Catholics Pay Tithe or Not?

‘Three woes are now addressed to the Pharisees, those contemporaries of Jesus whose lives were strictly regulated by the interpretation of the Mosaic Law as proposed by their scribes. The first one contrasts their concern for minutiae and for the building of fences around the Law with their neglect of what is really important: they tithe tiny herbs and forget about justice and the love of God. Jesus does not do away with tithing, but says rather, “First things first”’ That was John Rose quoting Fitzmyer (Cf. John’s Weekdays Homilies, Volume 2). The quote concerns Luke 11:42-45, and it was the reading we had on Wednesday this week. ‘Fr. John Rose is the Rector Cum Parish Priest of St. Mary’s Basilica, Bangalore and the Manager and Correspondence of St. Mary’s Educational Institutions. He is also the Secretary of the Archdiocesan Board of Education.’ He is not from Nigeria, but an Indian. So, his primary audience was the Indians. His reflection on the above passage was not reactionary nor moved by populism as banal positions you find on tithe today in Nigeria.

To those who argue blindly that tithes are paid solely to Levites and that where there is no Levite, there should be no tithe, listen to St. Thomas Aquinas: ‘Now the principle of the payment of tithes is the debt whereby carnal things are due to those who sow spiritual things according to the saying of the Apostle (1 Cor.ix.11), 1f “we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great matter if we reap your carnal things”? [Thus implying that on the contrary it is no great matter if we reap your carnal things]’ (Summa, Q. 87, Art. 2). He continues: ‘The right to receive tithes is a spiritual thing, for it arises from the debt in virtue of which the ministers of the altar have a right to the expenses of their ministry, and temporal things are due to those who sow spiritual things. This debt concerns none but the clergy who have care of souls, and so they alone are competent to have this right (Q 87, Art.3).

As for the uses of tithe, and whether the poor can pay tithe, Thomas Aquinas said: ‘Tithes should be employed for the assistance of the poor, through the dispensation of the clergy. Hence the poor have no reason for accepting tithes, but they are bound to them’ (Q. 87, Art. 4, Rep.Obj.4).

He offers additional reason why tithes are paid and brings St. Augustine in as a witness: ‘[Moreover] the ministers of the New Law are more strictly forbidden to occupy themselves in money-making trades, according to 2 Tim. ii. 4, “No man being a soldier to God, entangleth himself with secular business.” Wherefore in the New Law men are bound to pay personal tithes, according to the custom of their country and the needs of the ministers: hence Augustine, whose words are quoted 16, qu.1, Cap. Decimar, says: “Tithes must be paid on the profits of soldiering, trade or craft”’ (Q.87.art.2).

Catholic priests should be courageous to swim against the current populism that imposes personal views on the Scripture; they should defend the Bible and tradition by telling the truth even if the truth is unpopular. Abuses of tithe today by Pentecostal pastors who are not even ordained priests do not render tithing completely obsolete and otiose as peddled by populists. Those priests who come to tell us how they reject tithe are simply looking for praises of men. We have never made tithe a major topic in our Church, nor do we ever make those who piously bring their tithes look stupid as some priests are incline to do today.

12/10/2024

"Those who spend their days in wealth are tempted to say to God , 'depart from us'; or to their hearts, 'depart from God'." (So says Matthew Henry on the young man who turned his back on Christ rather than turn his back on his wealth).

Note that wealth can be intelligence, money, beauty, pedigree, connections, influence etc.

Address

Catholic Diocese Of Nsukka, Enugu
Nsukka
14091981

Telephone

+2348038062920

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Fr Ugwu Vitus posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Fr Ugwu Vitus:

Share