13/08/2025
Boycotting Hindus —On one hand, a Hindu girl is forcibly married to a Muslim man, while on the other, if a Hindu boy falls in love with a Muslim girl, he is forced to convert to Islam.If he doesn’t, the entire Muslim community attacks the Hindus.
In April this year, Vishal Jain, the only son of Bharat Bhushan of Nagina, fell in love with a Muslim girl. He converted to Islam, took the name Waseem Ahmad, and married her.
Now he lives in Ballabhgarh. Even after Vishal became Muslim, the Muslims there began threatening his father. Fearing for his life, he sold his house and property and moved to Faridabad.
Because of this incident, the remaining Hindus in Nagina were openly threatened that in retaliation, one Hindu girl would be abducted.
As a result, for a long time, Hindus there stopped sending their daughters to school or college.
A fatwa was also issued that no Muslim should buy anything from a Hindu shopkeeper.
Muslim watchmen were placed outside Hindu shops to ensure that if any Muslim was found buying from a Hindu shopkeeper, they would be caught.This boycott of Hindus lasted for a long time.
Hindus in Mewat say that Hindu shopkeepers are boycotted frequently on one pretext or another. The main two purposes of this are:
(1) to drive Hindus away, and
(2) to avoid paying outstanding dues.
Muslims here often buy goods on credit from Hindu shopkeepers, and when the dues increase, they boycott them. Hindus say giving goods on credit is their compulsion —if they refuse, they also face trouble.
Why are the Sangh, BJP, judiciary, and media silent on Mewat?
A Historical Perspective —
The great historian Will Durant devoted his life to writing his massive 11-volume Story of Civilization. In the first volume, in the section on Indian history, he gave a deeply moving conclusion worth reading for every lover of India:
A thousand years ago, India was the richest and most prosperous country in the world.
Yet, invaders from outside came almost every year to plunder it. So regular were their annual raids that even the time of year for the invasions became fixed! This wealthy civilization made no arrangements to fight or repel them, and every year it was helplessly looted and ravaged.
Durant, with sorrow and amazement, wrote
that from Mahmud of Ghazni to his son Masud Ghazni,they looted India whenever they wanted,
and India — rich in knowledge, virtue, and wealth — could do nothing. Durant’s philosophical remark on this phenomenon was:
Civilization is a precious thing. It is not protected by chanting mantras of non-violence and peace to protect it, a strong system must be in place, otherwise, even minor barbarians can destroy it. Isn’t this lesson sadly relevant for us today?
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar once said:
“For Muslims, Hindus are kafirs, and a kafir is not worthy of respect. He is born of a low caste and has no social standing.Therefore, in any country where kafirs rule, it is considered Dar-ul-Harb (land of war) for Muslims.
In such a situation, there is no need for further proof to show that Muslims will not accept the rule of a Hindu government.”
