30/05/2026
There is evidence that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit were ideas in circulation in the early part of the second century, but it wasn’t until the third century that agreement was reached, after competing factions had wrangled over Jesus and his precise relationship to God, and had labelled each other heretics for their theories.
But all this begs the question, if Jesus had been so clear about precisely who he was, then why was the intervention of the emperor needed in the first place? Why did a disputed explanation of Jesus and the divine exist in the first place?
The answer is that Jesus hadn’t been clear, or at least that he hadn’t claimed for himself, what others later came to believe of him.
Jesus had spoken of himself as the Son of Man, or a Son of God, but these titles could be applied at the time to others of holiness and devotion.
Certainly, others asked him whether he was the Messiah, and his answers were enigmatic,
What the early church was struggling to make sense of, was what the theologian Marcus Borg termed the pre-Easter and the post-Easter Jesus.
There is evidence that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit were...