03/07/2023
21 Days to make any comments
The long-expected planning application for the Chapel was validated by CCC planning on the 26th of June.
We have I think 21 days to make any comments.
The application is for a single dwelling (4 bedrooms) with car parking for 2 cars.
In the planning application, the housing category is described as “Market Housing” which means it can be sold on the open market after completion, or upon receipt of planning consent. (If the applicant wanted to live in it, he could have opted for the self-build category which would have saved him about £71,000 in CIL charges and probably an additional £50,000 in VAT)
Based on the above, it would look likely that the applicant intends to sell the property on receipt of planning consent or after developing it. In either instance, the village will be left with whatever problems exist while the applicant “trousers” his profit and disappears into the sunset.
As an indication of the problems, we might have to face in the future, the planning application drawing of the house shows a large clear area on the ground floor, overlooked by galleries at both ends, this would be ideal for lively parties. This leads to a risk that the house could go into the short-term holiday rental market and become a “party house” leading to a reduction of our residential amenity.
One result of the research on the recently adopted Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) was that a large majority of the residents of Flushing wanted all new housing to be Primary dwellings, (A primary dwelling is a house occupied full-time by the owner or a tenant on a long-term rental agreement.) unfortunately, this was inextricably dropped from the NDP before it was adopted by Cornwall County Council.
Even though the primary housing requirement was omitted from the NDP, it represents our strongest protection against this, and other new builds being bought up by investors and used as short-term holiday rentals, which apart from the disruption they can cause to residents, do not contribute to the housing stock available for the population of Cornwall.
We will object to the application because it presumes a vehicular right of way over land which belongs to our family. (This is to access the car parking) No such right of way has been granted.
I informed the Architect who also turns out to be the applicant that we would dispute any assumption of a right of way and would only grant it if the house was restricted to being a primary dwelling.
Vincent Roberts
32 Kersey Rd