St Nicholas Church

St Nicholas Church Cublington's village church, a central part of our community and a visible symbol of our Christian fa

A cracking good cream tea today, and raised funds for StreetVet and our church
30/08/2026

A cracking good cream tea today, and raised funds for StreetVet and our church

The heatwave may be over by the end of August but the Cream Teas will be served at St Nicholas,  Cublington.  Join us an...
09/08/2026

The heatwave may be over by the end of August but the Cream Teas will be served at St Nicholas, Cublington. Join us and raise funds for StreetVet and our church. Craft and homemade preserves will be on sale!

https://www.facebook.com/share/1SKFJ9PbbT/
30/06/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1SKFJ9PbbT/

THE LEADERSHIP THINGY

An extract from the diary of Mr Horse Palmer, Very Odd Job Man.
(Found on a pew at the back of the church. I thought it might be of interest to the Faithful. Judith.)

I have been watching the business at Downing Street, because every time I learn who is in charge, someone appears at a black door looking haunted and promises further announcements.

It put me in mind of St Faithful’s.

Not because Tim Keen looks like a Prime Minister. He does not. He looks like a man who has remembered a funeral is about to start while halfway through a cheese sandwich. But I wondered whether the same principle might apply. When a parish gets restless, it looks at the vicarage curtains and wonders whether a different silhouette might bring renewal.

So I decided to take soundings, which is what politicians call asking people what they already think, hoping to discover they were right all along.

I began with Dobbs, who was in the boiler room making a noise like an elderly hippo falling downstairs.

“Dobbs,” I said, “would St Faithful’s benefit from a change of leadership at the top?”

He emerged from behind the boiler, holding a spanner and looking like a man who had personally negotiated with carbon monoxide.

“Depends,” he said. “Would the new vicar know about the crack in the north wall?”

“I doubt that would be in the person specification.”

“Then no. No good changing vicars if the new one doesn’t understand the crack in the wall.”

Dobbs explained that Tim knew which doors stuck, which radiators lied, which light switches did nothing, and which parishioners must never be allowed near a folding table. A new vicar would arrive full of vision, ask why the noticeboards were at four different angles, not realising the answer was “because the walls are frightened of Judith.”

“We’ve actually got Tim fairly well house-trained now,” Dobbs said. I wondered how long it would take to get a new vicar to the same state of slightly enthusiastic yet cheerful compliance.

“So you’re against change?” I said.

“No,” said Dobbs. “I’m against pretending change has happened because somebody different is confused.”

I proceeded to the parish office, where Judith Crowther was arranging papers into piles according to urgency, despair, and things Tim had promised to deal with “after coffee.”

“Judith,” I said, “would a new vicar inject fresh energy into St Faithful’s?”

Judith looked over her glasses.

“Fresh energy into whom?”

“The parish.”

“By which you mean us?”

“I suppose.”

“That,” said Judith, “is precisely the problem.”

“Everybody wants a lively parish, Horse. But quite a lot of people mean: ‘I would like someone else to make the parish lively, while I sit in the same pew, object to unfamiliar hymns, forget my Gift Aid envelope, and welcome young families, provided their children are silent.’”

“That seems harsh,” I said.

“It is only harsh because it is accurate.”

Judith observed that changing the vicar would not make the coffee urn fill itself, the flower rota become comprehensible, the website update itself, the west door close properly, or the evangelism thingy become less...well, thingy.

“Leadership matters,” she said. “But leadership is not magic. It is direction. People still have to choose to follow.”

My next interview was with Lionel Hargreaves, who was at the organ practising something French and disapproving.

“Lionel,” I shouted, “would a new vicar improve St Faithful’s?”

“A new vicar,” he said, “might choose worse hymns.”

“Or better.”

Lionel looked at me for a long time.

“No. Tim knows exactly which hymns I like, and which ones will get me sighing and playing deliberately slowly.”

Then he added that a conductor matters, but even the finest conductor cannot rescue a choir if the tenors think rhythm optional and the basses are searching for notes last seen in 1974.

I moved on before the metaphor became libellous.

By lunchtime I had reached the Little John, where I consulted those parishioners most likely to have an opinion and least likely to have read the agenda.

Several people said change was essential. When I asked what change they had in mind, they said “more outreach,” “better welcome,” “proper youth work,” “more Bible studies,” and “something with social media.” When I asked whether they were volunteering, they became interested in their crisps.

In my experience, opinion is plentiful. Volunteers are scarcer, and usually need bringing back from the kitchen.

This, I reflected, is where parishes and governments resemble each other. Everyone wants renewal. Everyone wants courage. Everyone wants a fresh start. But most people mean they would like someone at the top to do something inspiring, so that no one at the bottom has to move very much. After all, I thought, everyone has an opinion - but the percentage of voters in the country who are actively engaged in politics is roughly similar to the number of parishioners willing to do more than turn up to church now and again.

Changing the captain of the Titanic will not stop the ship sinking if the iceberg is already in the bow and the passengers are drilling holes in the deck to improve ventilation.

In the afternoon I met Sybil Rachett by the charity shop, carrying a box labelled BRIC-A-BRAC / POSSIBLY LITURGICAL.

“Are you trying to get Tim sacked?” she asked.

“Not exactly. I am researching leadership.”

“Good,” she said. “Then research followership as well.”

Sybil said Tim was not perfect, which is true, though I would not say it near him in case he agreed too readily. He forgets names, over-explains notices, and sometimes speaks about hope in a way that makes people realise they have confused it with optimism. But Sybil said a parish cannot outsource its soul to the vicar and then complain when holiness is not delivered before lunch.

“If St Faithful’s wants change,” she said, “St Faithful’s must change. The people who say ‘someone should’ must discover that someone is often them.”

I carried that thought home like a dangerous parcel.

So here is my conclusion.

A new vicar might bring fresh ideas, fresh sermons, and fresh confusion about why the church hall key lives in a biscuit tin marked PALM CROSSES 2008. But unless the rest of us decide to become different too, we shall only have changed the person standing in front of the same old reluctance.

The parish does not need a messiah in a clerical collar. It needs a congregation willing to pull its weight. It needs welcomers who welcome, singers who sing, givers who give, pray-ers who pray, and committees that do the thing they were formed to do.

Same with countries, I suppose. Leaders matter. Captains matter. Vicars matter. But if everyone sits in steerage saying the bridge ought to do something, we should not be surprised when our feet get wet.

So I am sticking with Tim.

Not because he is the answer.

Because none of us is allowed to pretend he is.

---

Enjoyed your visit to Havnot?

St Faithful’s is fictional. The affection is real. The meetings, regrettably, are plausible.

If you would like more parish life, more Dobbs, more Judith, more theology smuggled in under nonsense, more books, more chaos, or a mug that quietly suggests you have survived a PCC meeting, everything begins here:
[https://tinyurl.com/4k9jtpbe](https://tinyurl.com/4k9jtpbe)

That link will take you to Canon Tom’s books, e-books, audiobook, merchandise and Substack, all gathered together in one alarming but useful place.
Print books are also available — in person only — from St Faith’s Charity Shop, 4 North Street, Havant.

A note on AI: ChatGPT — known in Havnot as Artie Fischal — is often deployed to help shape, sharpen and illustrate these posts. The drafting, judgement, theology, bad parish memories, and publishing responsibility remain entirely human.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1N4dyR91sm/
24/05/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1N4dyR91sm/

UNLOCKING THE DOORS...PENTECOST UNLEASHED
---
Canon Tom Kennar is taking some time off. But if he had been preaching today, this is what he would have said:
---

Pentecost is one of those great feasts of the Church which, if we are honest, we have tidied up a bit.

We have made it red and respectable. We have given it proper hymns, a place in the calendar, and a tasteful dove on the service sheet, looking calm and holy, as though the Holy Spirit were mainly in the business of gliding gently over laminated notices.

But the first Pentecost was not tasteful.

It was noisy, confusing, and faintly alarming. It involved wind, fire, public speaking, allegations of drunkenness, and a group of Galileans suddenly becoming comprehensible to people from everywhere. In parish terms, it was less “well-planned festival Eucharist” and more “the flower rota has caught fire and the PCC is speaking Welsh.”

Pentecost is not the birthday of the Church in the sense that God founded a calm religious institution with minutes, policies, and a subcommittee for biscuits. Pentecost is the moment when the Spirit of God blows through frightened people and turns them outward.

The disciples had been waiting. They had seen Jesus crucified. They had encountered him risen. They had been told to stay where they were until power came from on high. And then, suddenly, the house cannot contain what God is doing.

That is the first thing Pentecost says to us: God is not easily contained.

We try, of course. We contain God in buildings, doctrines, traditions, and respectable behaviour. We contain God in the sentence, “We’ve always done it this way,” which must be one of the most spiritually dangerous sentences ever uttered, usually just before someone moves a pew.

But the Spirit comes as wind. Not as a memo. Not as a diocesan initiative. Wind. Breath. Movement. The thing you cannot grasp, cannot own, cannot put in the safe with the silver chalice.

And the Spirit comes as fire. Not fire that destroys, but fire that rests on each person. Fire that gives courage. Fire that warms cold hearts and burns away fear. Fire that is not reserved for the religiously impressive. It rests on all of them.

Pentecost is not God saying, “I have selected the most competent disciples.” Thank goodness. If competence were required, the Church would have ended somewhere around Acts chapter two. Pentecost is God saying, “These people will do. These frightened, muddled, argumentative, hopeful people. I can work with them.”

Which is good news, because, looking at us all, here today, that appears still to be the recruitment policy.

Then comes the miracle of languages. And notice what the miracle is not. It is not that everyone suddenly speaks one holy language. It is not that diversity is flattened into uniformity. It is not that everyone becomes the same, thinks the same, worships the same, votes the same, or agrees about the temperature of church coffee.

The story is that people hear good news in their own language.

Some commentators have said that Pentecost is the reversal of the Tower of Babel. But, I’m not so sure. Pentecost is not the reversal of diversity. It is the sanctifying of it. The Spirit does not erase difference. The Spirit communicates across difference. Parthians, Medes, Elamites — and lots of other unpronounceable nationalities — all hear the mighty works of God in the language of home.

Home matters. Culture matters. Accent matters. The particular words by which people understand love, mercy, justice and hope matter.

So whenever Christianity becomes obsessed with making everyone conform — whenever it mistakes uniformity for unity, control for holiness, nostalgia for faithfulness — it has wandered a very long way from Pentecost.

But Peter stands up and explains that this is what the prophet Joel promised: sons and daughters shall prophesy, young people shall see visions, old people shall dream dreams, and even slaves — those right at the bottom of the social order — shall receive the Spirit.

That little word “even” is where the revolution begins.

Pentecost says that God is not the private possession of the powerful. God is not locked behind priesthood, privilege, gender, age, class, education, respectability, or any of the other barriers human beings are so wonderfully inventive at constructing. The Spirit is poured out on all flesh.

All flesh. Not approved flesh. Not familiar flesh. Not flesh with a DBS certificate and a sensible cardigan. All flesh.

And then we hear the Gospel reading from John. The disciples are behind locked doors, afraid. Jesus comes among them and says, “Peace be with you.” Then he breathes on them and says, “Receive the Holy Spirit.”

In Acts, the Spirit is wind and flame and public astonishment. In John, the Spirit is breath in a locked room. One is dramatic; the other is intimate. One is a gale; the other is a whisper close enough to feel.

We need both.

Sometimes the Spirit throws open the doors and sends us into the street. Sometimes the Spirit comes to us when the doors are locked, when we are frightened, when all we can do is sit in the ruins of what we thought we understood. Sometimes the Spirit is not fireworks. Sometimes the Spirit is breath enough for the next hour.

Jesus does not shame the frightened disciples. He comes among them. He gives peace. He breathes Spirit. Then he sends them.

That is the rhythm of Pentecost: peace, breath, sending. Not peace as avoidance. Not breath as private comfort. Not sending as religious busyness. But peace that heals fear, breath that restores life, and sending that carries love into the world.

So perhaps Pentecost asks us a simple question: where have we locked the doors?

Where have we decided God cannot possibly be speaking? Through that person? Through that generation? Through that culture? Through that awkward new possibility? Through that change we would rather avoid because it will involve a meeting, and probably flipchart paper?

And where might the Spirit already be making herself inconveniently known?

Perhaps in voices we have not listened to. Perhaps in young people dreaming a Church that looks different from the one we inherited. Perhaps in old people dreaming dreams we have mistaken for memories.

Pentecost does not give us a tame God. It gives us wind, fire, breath, courage, speech, listening, peace and movement.

It gives us a Church that begins not with certainty, but with astonishment.

“They were amazed and perplexed,” says Acts. Honestly, that may be the most faithful response to God most of us can manage.

Amazed and perplexed. Slightly singed. Unexpectedly hopeful. Doors unlocked. Hearts warmed. Tongues loosened. And discovering, to our surprise, that the Spirit of God is not finished with us yet.

Amen.

A wonderful service today with three baptisms, (2  adults and baby Phillippa).
26/04/2026

A wonderful service today with three baptisms, (2 adults and baby Phillippa).

05/04/2026

Easter Sunrise live on Jane's page

Address

High Street
Cublington
LU70

Opening Hours

9am - 10am

Telephone

+441296715660

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when St Nicholas Church posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to St Nicholas Church:

Shortcuts

Share

Category