04/21/2026
Is the church called to be relevant?
"My reign is NOT of this order" - John 18:36
In the passion according to John, Jesus and Pilate have a discourse on the nature of kingship that is often overlooked, glossed over for the more dramatic scenes, yet this dialogue contains the kernel of the church's identity and so her mission (the word translated as church - not a good translation- is always in the feminine).
Pilate asks if Jesus sees himself as a monarch (the embodiment of power) of Judea (in John's Gospel the word mis-translated as Jews should be Judeans referring only to the tribe of Judah, the collective term Hebrew is used for all of Israel, hence letter to the Hebrews).
Jesus replies that his reign is not of this "order" and this is an important distinction to bear in mind. In the Greek, the word 'cosmos' does not mean the physical world (atoms, particles, galaxies, trees, gases, etc.,) rather the origin of the word is the verb, "to put in order, to adorn, to arrange in a sequence." What Jesus is here stating is the incompatibility of the way in which God governs and every (fallen) human order or government.
Christ makes it clear: "No one can serve two masters" and this is said without exception. It is an error to view that as followers of Christ we are called to "render unto Caesar the things that belong to Caesar and to God the things that are God's" as if these are compatible, they are NOT. For both lay claim to the same space, namely the human heart, mind, will, strength. When Jesus gave this reply to his interlocuters, he knew their allegiance was not to God to but Caesar, evidenced by the coin (silver denarius) they carried, that bore the image of the emperor.
What is overlooked here is that this coin was forbidden inside of the temple - the 2nd commandment - so whoever had the coin was in violation of these laws. Outside of the temple, the coin was banned from uses in places of "ill repute" such as brothels as a form of payment as the coin was linked to the person of the emperor. To use the coin in such places was regarded as "treason" punishable by death. The choice is thus always, "Christ or Caesar" not "Christ and Caesar" for that is not a choice.
Either the church lives out the reign of God or she participates in this present (fallen) order, that as Paul tells us is fated to perish. Either the church is called to be relevant to a dying order, groaning under the weight of sin, subjected to the power of death OR is she called to follow the resurrected Lord who reigns, awaiting his return upon the clouds, bringing about a new creation, free from disobedience and death?
The angels asked a question of the women who came to the tomb on Resurrection Sunday, "Why do you seek the living among the dead?" In the same way, why are we concerned with serving an order that is in its death throws?
The church is called to be faithful and NOT relevant. The church is called to persevere NOT to succeed. The church is called to preach Christ and him crucified NOT to be "useful" to a fallen order, preaching "cheap grace"
The church is an outpost of the kingdom of God, that invades this present order, revealing its wisdom as foolishness, is wealth as poverty, its strength as weakness. Its life as death.
The church is not called to reform this order but to witness to its enmity with God and its eventual destruction by His righteous judgment. If this is the case, then this order cannot be "of God," that is God "willed by God" , nevertheless he does allow it, to reveal it as a fraud and usurper.
As for the often referenced Romans 13, it is helpful to see this within the paradigm or ethic of love, "pray for those who persecute you, do not repay evil for evil, etc.," and not to place the emperor within some other, special category. Laws may be just or fair and NOT. For the church to obey unjust laws is to participate in the rebellion of this fallen order.
That the reign of God and the order of humanity are inherently oppositional, and so incompatible, is revealed in that Christ was crucified (for claiming to be a king) that Paul was beheaded in Rome, that Peter and the other disciples (save one) were ultimately put to death by Rome. So much for the "tolerance" and "religious freedom."
When Rome looked at the church, she saw a threat to her status as the "light of the world" and the figure of the emperor as "the Chosen One" given a divine mandate (in the case of Rome the god Jupiter) to bring peace (through conquest) and prosperity (by enslavement and extraction).
The church cannot bless such a state, any state, even if that state identifies as "Christian" (It is not - for every follower of Christ is part of the body of Christ, hence nations cannot be "Christian" in any sense).
The church is called to stand and witness to a kingdom that is not of this fallen order, where love, truth, beauty, compassion, forgiveness, generosity, joy, selflessness, radiate from the soul outward. Where sins are forgiven and there is newness of life.
The church cannot seek power, nor entrance to the halls of power, but in humility, serve her Sovereign, until she hears the words,
"Come, you who are blessed by my Father; inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world."