05/12/2026
ALL THINGS IN COMMON
“All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold their property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.”
These two verses from the beginning of the Book of Acts have inspired and haunted the church for 2000 years. They speak an ideal of human harmony and solidarity that we know, in our bones, should be true: that there should be no divisions of power or wealth among us. We belong to God and to each other, and that’s an end of it. This ideal survives to this day, precariously, in a thousand monasteries and convents. And if, beyond its cloisters, the Church has never been equal to this ideal, neither have we forgotten it. It haunts us still.
“All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold their property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.”
So the early disciples lived, and the only way to account for it is the fact that Jesus had recently risen from the dead, ascended into heaven, and sent his Holy Spirit upon the people. This, they felt, changed everything. The disciples held the audacious idea that, if we have God, we have everything we need. If we have God, then everything else just gets in the way. So, they thought, we might as well share. The disciples trusted that when Christ rose from the dead, all creation was made new, and that their relationships should share in that newness. If they were united in Christ, why should they be divided by mere possessions?
Let us admit that the idea makes us nervous. We think of all we own, and can’t imagine giving it all away. We sympathise with the young man in Matthew’s gospel. Jesus tells him “’If you wish to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.’ When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.” Perhaps we, like this young man, do not wish to be perfect.
It has been argued that the idea of sharing all we have with others was easier 2000 years ago because the disciples believed that Jesus would soon return to Earth, and history would come to an end. Saint Paul, in his earliest letters, clearly believed that the second Coming of Christ would be a matter of weeks or months - a year at most. All earthly things, he believed, were soon to pass away. So why save for the future when the future might be only a few more days?
Well, we know better now, and I’m sure that if we could tell young Saint Paul that the Church would still be here 2000 years later, and that we are still reading his letters, he would be astonished. It is only in his last letters that Paul accepts that the Church must settle in for the long haul. As the years passed and the church grew in numbers, it had to start planning for the future. The church, when it was not suffering persecution, began to invest in real estate and property, and to ordain deacons and priests - people like me - and pay them a living wage. It was understood that the church, though its purpose is heavenly, must also learn how to live sensibly upon the earth.
The church therefore is a human institution, bound by history and time and circumstance. But we are also called to live in the light of eternity, as citizens of heaven. We insist that Jesus, through his Holy Spirit, has already returned to us, and that our eternal lives have already begun, on this side of heaven. So it is that the promise of heaven and the demands of earth continually come into conflict.
Consider the issue addressed by our Diocesan Synod last week. We have a Cathedral in Fredericton, very beautiful, very precious, that will cost us 20 million dollars to maintain. This we do not have, and the question, obviously, is should we keep it? Do we own the Cathedral, or does the Cathedral own us? Maybe we should just give the building away, to a secular foundation. Like the early disciples, maybe we should share it with everyone?
Or is it possible that we can be loyal to both a building made of stone, and a Kingdom made of human souls? Perhaps. Such was the uneasy decision we reached at our meeting. But it is a difficult question: how do we balance our earthly needs and our divine purpose? It is a perennial question, one that has shaped Christian history for the last 2000 years. It is also a deeply personal question, one that you and I will wrestle with for the rest of our lives. As Jesus said, “Where your treasure is, there your heart is also.”
”All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold their property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.”
These verses have rarely been lived out by a community over a long time. But they have been lived by a few extraordinary individuals. So far as we know, Jesus in his adult life had no earthly home. He did not own land. He had no bank account, no Visa card. Instead, he lived on charity, which is another word for “love.” He gave away all he had, trusting his Heavenly Father to provide everything he would need, and this allowed him an extraordinary freedom.
“Let tomorrow’s problems wait for tomorrow” he counsels us. “Why do you worry about clothes? Look at the flowers of the field. They do not labour or spin. Yet not even Solomon in all his glory was dressed like one of these. If this is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you?” If today we celebrate Jesus as our Good Shepherd, it is because he promises to care for us in the same way.
Beyond Jesus, I suppose Saint Francis comes to mind. One day, in central Italy, back in the 13th century, wealthy young Francesco Bernadone went for a ride in the countryside on his horse. When it began to rain, horse and rider turned and headed for home, a warm fireplace, and a hot meal. But on his way, Frances met a poor man on the side of the road. He was cold and wet, and at the sight of him Francis felt his heart divide. Why should this man have nothing when he, Francis, had everything? So he climbed off his horse, gave the man his cloak, and rode away, shivering cold but happy. And why? Because the giving gave him joy.
”All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold their property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.”
It should be joy, not guilt, and not the heavy burden of obligation, that we hear in these astonishing verses. Why should we love our neighbours? Well, maybe because it will make us happy. Francis later gave away his property so freely that his father, a wealthy cloth merchant, confronted him in the village square and threatened to disown him. Whereupon Francis took off all his clothes and said that from that moment on he would possess nothing, absolutely nothing. “Give them to the poor,” he said about the clothing at his feet. The Bishop of Assisi, witnessing the argument, hurried over, took off his cloak and covered Francis with it - whereupon Francis, famously, walked off into the woods, singing a French folk song.
And there I think we’ll leave them, Jesus and Francis, you and I, and the Christian church throughout the world and throughout the ages, with the generosity that brings joy, and the faith that brings freedom. Amen
Send a message to learn more