17/07/2026
QUESTIONS ARE WELCOME
The Tenth and Final Vicarage Discussion
exploring the Statement of Doctrinal Certainty
By the tenth Vicarage Discussion, Tim Keen had stopped pretending the kitchen table would ever return to normal.
It was now covered with the archaeological remains of theological enquiry: the red love-heart balloon, the Limits of God card, the rewritten Bible clause, the cardboard Son of God box, salvation slides, the Doctrinal Trampoline, the Fruit of the Spirit satsuma, the battered Faith bag, and the Vicarage Table Seating Plan.
Sybil Ratchet had looked at it all and said, “When I move in properly, are we keeping the evidence?”
Tim had said, “It is not evidence. It is theology.”
“That,” said Sybil, “is what people say when they have lost the receipt.”
Tonight’s card read:
"Clause 10: Questions are welcome.
Answers may be provisional."
Judith Crowther stared at it for some time.
“May be?” she said.
“Yes,” said Tim.
“Not shall be?”
“No.”
“Not must be?”
“No.”
“Not subject to review by an appointed panel?”
“No.”
Judith looked genuinely troubled. “Then how will we know when we have finished?”
“We won’t,” said Sandy Lintel.
Lionel Hargreaves folded his hands. “There is an honourable tradition of provisionality. The Church has always developed doctrine. Though preferably with care, memory, and less stationery.”
Horse Palmer looked up. “So being provisional doesn’t mean making it up as we go along?”
“No,” said Tim. “That is improvisation.”
“Like Messy Church,” said Dobbs.
“Or clergy rotas,” said Sally Tiredwell.
“Provisional,” said Tim, “means we are honest about the limits of our seeing. We give the best answer we can, in faith, with Scripture, tradition, reason, experience, prayer, and the occasional flapjack. But we do not mistake our answer for God. Nor do we demand that everyone around us must believe the same thing.”
Paula Jenkins nodded. “That matters. Because people who think they have final answers often become dangerous around people who are still forming the question.”
Jack Malik turned his mug slowly. “I like questions. Buildings begin with questions. What is this for? Who will use it? What weight must it carry? Where is the light coming from? What has cracked, and why?”
Sandy smiled. “And theology?”
“The same, probably. What is this for? Who is carrying the weight? Where is the light? What has cracked?”
Tim looked at him. “You realise I may steal that.”
“I assumed you already had.”
Perry Wainwright lifted his glass. “But surely some answers are not provisional. God is love. Christ is Lord. The resurrection. The Creed. The Commandments. One cannot run a Church on question marks alone.”
“No,” said Tim. “But one can kill a Church by banning them.”
There was a small silence.
Tim continued. “We are not saying every answer is equally true, or that nothing matters. We are saying that questions are not enemies of faith. They are often how faith breathes.”
Sybil said, “I wish the Church had said that more often.”
Tim looked at her.
She shrugged. “I mean it. If more churches had said, ‘Bring your questions,’ instead of ‘Here are the answers, stop fidgeting,’ I might have arrived sooner.”
“That,” said Sally, “is quite a sentence.”
Judith wrote it down before anyone could stop her.
Lionel looked at the card. “There is also a difference between questions asked in good faith and questions asked merely to dismantle.”
“Yes,” said Tim. “Some questions are honest. Some are weapons. Some are avoidance. Some are love letters. Some are smoke bombs. The work of a community is discernment.”
Horse raised a hand. “Mine are mostly smoke bombs.”
“We know,” said Judith.
Paula said, “But even awkward questions may protect people. ‘Who decided this?’ ‘Who benefits?’ ‘Who is being excluded?’ ‘Why is this called tradition when it only started in 1987?’”
Dobbs sat up. “The brass flower pedestals.”
“Exactly,” said Paula.
Judith’s pen paused. “I feel attacked on behalf of the entire flower team.”
Sandy said, “The Faithful have asked whether this whole Statement is now less certain than when we began.”
Tim looked at the table. “I hope so.”
Perry looked startled.
Tim smiled. “Not less faithful. Less brittle. There is a difference. Brittle certainty shatters when struck. Faith can bend, learn, repent, and still hold.”
Jack said, “Like old timber.”
“Exactly.”
“Unless there is beetle,” said Dobbs.
“Yes. Thank you, Dobbs.”
Sandy scrolled through her notes. “So what have we learned?”
Horse counted on his fingers. “God is love, but not a balloon.”
“God is bigger than our ideas,” said Sally.
“The Bible is inspired, but not to be thrown,” said Paula.
“Jesus is the Son of God, but not for administrative convenience,” said Judith.
“Salvation is not a machine,” said Jack.
“The Spirit is not a management chart,” said Sybil.
“Being right is not fruit,” said Dobbs.
“Faith is a bag, not a box,” said Horse.
“Doubt is not apathy,” said Sandy.
Lionel looked at the card. “And questions are welcome.”
There was a pause. It felt like a final chord, and for once Lionel did not identify the composer.
Tim said, “That may be the whole Statement, really. Not certainty as possession, but faith as hospitality. We welcome questions because God is not frightened by them. We welcome doubters because Christ did. We welcome provisional answers because the Spirit is still at work.”
Judith looked down at her notes. “There is a problem.”
“Of course there is,” said Tim.
“If answers may be provisional, then the Statement itself may require revision.”
“Yes,” said Tim.
“Possibly repeated revision.”
“Yes.”
“Possibly without notice.”
Tim smiled. “That is already in the small print.”
Judith turned to the printed Statement. At the bottom it read:
This Statement may be revised without notice, should further reflection, prayer, lived experience, or divine interruption require it.
She read it aloud, very slowly.
Horse said, “Divine interruption is my favourite kind, unless it happens during lunch.”
Perry said, “I still think certainty has its place.”
“So do I,” said Tim. “But perhaps not on the throne. Certainty can serve faith. It must not replace it.”
Sybil looked at him. “And questions?”
“Questions keep faith honest.”
Jack said, “And alive.”
Paula added, “And safe for people who have been harmed by other people’s answers.”
Tim nodded.
Judith wrote the agreed note.
Clause Ten: Questions are welcome. Answers may be provisional. The Church is not weakened by honest enquiry, but by fear of it. Questions asked with humility, courage, pain, curiosity, or love may deepen faith and protect the vulnerable. Provisional answers are not failed answers; they are faithful attempts to speak truth while remaining open to Scripture, reason, experience, repentance, and the living God.
Tim read it back.
For once, no one immediately improved it.
Then Judith underlined “provisional answers are not failed answers” and said, “I can live with that.”
“Provisionally?” asked Sandy.
Judith looked at her.
Then, very slowly, she smiled. “Obviously.”
Perry raised his glass. “To the Statement.”
“To the questions,” said Sybil.
“To answers that can breathe,” said Jack.
“To divine interruption,” said Paula.
“To the living God,” said Tim.
“To flapjacks,” said Dobbs.
“To not revising anything else tonight,” said Judith.
Horse looked at the table, with all its cards, drawings, crumbs, mugs, and small brave attempts at theology.
“So,” he said, “are we certain now?”
Tim leaned back in his chair.
“No,” he said. “But I think we may be faithful.”
And because nobody had a better answer, and because the kettle was still warm, they let that stand.
Provisionally.
---
The fully expanded version of the Statement will be released tomorrow at 1700 (BST)
---
Enjoyed your visit to Havnot?
St Faithful’s is fictional. The affection is real. The meetings, regrettably, are plausible.
If you would like more parish life, more Dobbs, more Judith, more theology smuggled in under nonsense, more books, more chaos, or a mug that quietly suggests you have survived a PCC meeting, everything begins here:
https://tinyurl.com/4k9jtpbe
That link will take you to Canon Tom’s books, e-books, audiobook, merchandise and Substack, all gathered together in one alarming but useful place. Print books are also available — in person only — from St Faith’s Charity Shop, 4 North Street, Havant.
A note on AI: ChatGPT — known in Havnot as Artie Fischal — is often deployed to help shape, sharpen and illustrate these posts. The drafting, judgement, theology, bad parish memories, and publishing responsibility remain entirely human.
