Gwinnett Fellowship

Gwinnett Fellowship New Testament Church in Gwinnett County

05/30/2026

The Inside/Out Church is a work in progress. Here is Chapter 10 for you to enjoy/critique.

CHAPTER 10 - LEADERSHIP: WHO LEADS?

One of the first questions people ask when they begin to reconsider the institutional model of church is who will lead if the traditional structure is removed. The question is understandable because most believers have spent their entire Christian lives within systems where leadership is concentrated in the hands of a few individuals. For many, church has become almost inseparable from the person standing at the front of the room. The leader teaches, casts vision, answers questions, resolves problems, directs ministry, and often becomes the central point through which nearly everything flows. When people hear discussions about participatory gatherings, house churches, or shared ministry, they often assume that leadership is being diminished or discarded altogether. Yet the question itself reveals a deeper assumption that has quietly shaped much of modern church life. We have come to believe that leadership is the source from which the life of the church flows.

The New Testament presents an entirely different picture. The life of the church was never intended to flow from leadership. The life of the church flows from Jesus Christ Himself. Before we can have a meaningful discussion about leaders, we must first settle the question of who is truly leading. Scripture answers that question repeatedly and without ambiguity. Jesus Christ is the Head of His church. Paul writes that God "put all things in subjection under His feet, and gave Him as head over all things to the church." He later declares that Christ is "the head of the body, the church." These statements are not theological ornaments placed on top of Christian doctrine. They describe a present reality. The church belongs to Jesus. The church receives its life from Jesus. The church remains under the authority of Jesus.

This truth has enormous implications because it immediately places every other form of leadership into its proper place. Leadership exists beneath Christ, not alongside Him. Leadership serves His purposes rather than replacing them. Leaders are not spiritual intermediaries standing between God and His people. They are members of the Body whose purpose is to help others grow into maturity under the leadership of Christ Himself. Whenever leaders become the practical source of direction, wisdom, growth, or ministry, something has shifted away from the New Testament pattern. The issue is not whether leadership exists. The issue is whether leadership points people toward dependence upon Christ or toward dependence upon itself.

This distinction lies at the very heart of the Inside-Out Church vision. Throughout this book we have repeatedly returned to the question of source. In the Garden of Eden, humanity's fall was not merely an act of disobedience. It was a relational betrayal in which mankind turned away from God as the source of life and sought life elsewhere. The serpent's temptation was ultimately an invitation to find life apart from God. Ever since that moment, humanity has been searching for substitutes. Sometimes we seek life through possessions. Sometimes through power. Sometimes through pleasure. Sometimes through religion. Yet the pattern remains the same. Whenever we seek from something created what can only be found in our Creator, we move from an inside-out relationship with God toward an outside-in existence governed by substitutes.

This battle did not end in the Garden. It continues today. The enemy still seeks to redirect our trust and allegiance away from God as our source. The substitutes may look different, but the strategy remains remarkably familiar. Buildings can become substitutes. Programs can become substitutes. Traditions can become substitutes. Personalities can become substitutes. Even leadership itself can become a substitute. None of these things are inherently wrong. Problems arise only when they begin occupying a place that belongs exclusively to Christ. Healthy leadership continually points beyond itself. Unhealthy leadership gradually gathers attention to itself. Healthy leadership helps people depend more deeply upon Christ. Unhealthy leadership creates dependence upon leaders, institutions, and systems.

This is why the New Testament places such extraordinary emphasis upon the direct relationship every believer has with God. Under the New Covenant, the veil has been torn. The Spirit has been given. Every believer has access to the Father through Jesus Christ. The church is not a collection of spectators watching spiritual professionals perform ministry on their behalf. The church is a living family filled with the Spirit of God. It is also a living body in which every member possesses a function. It is also an army advancing the Kingdom of God into a world still held captive by darkness. These three pictures—family, body, and army—help us understand why leadership exists and how it is intended to function.

In a family, mature members help younger members grow. In a body, healthy parts help weaker parts function. In an army, experienced soldiers train younger soldiers for the mission ahead. None of these pictures suggest passive spectatorship. All of them assume participation, growth, responsibility, and multiplication. Leadership exists because people need guidance, protection, encouragement, and maturity. Yet leadership was never intended to replace the participation of God's people. Leadership exists to help God's people become everything He designed them to be.

Paul describes this beautifully when he explains that Christ gave apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers "for the equipping of the saints for the work of service, to the building up of the body of Christ." This single statement challenges many assumptions that have become deeply ingrained within modern church culture. The purpose of leadership is not to perform all the ministry. The purpose of leadership is to equip the saints to perform the ministry. Leaders succeed when the people around them become increasingly capable of serving, ministering, and participating in the work of the Kingdom. Their success is measured not by how much ministry they personally accomplish but by how effectively they help others mature into functioning members of the Body.

This principle becomes even clearer when we examine the role of apostles. In many modern settings, apostles are viewed as powerful figures occupying the highest levels of spiritual authority. Yet the New Testament paints a very different picture. Apostles were pioneers. They were foundation-layers. They were gospel proclaimers sent by Christ to establish believers and expand the reach of the Kingdom. Jesus called the Twelve so that they might be with Him and then sent them out. Their ministry was fundamentally outward-facing. They entered places where Christ was not yet known. They proclaimed the gospel. They gathered disciples. They established foundations. They strengthened believers. They raised up leaders and then moved on to new fields.

Paul describes this apostolic heart when he writes that he aspired to preach Christ where Christ had not yet been named. The apostolic calling was never primarily about maintaining existing structures. It was about advancing the Kingdom into new territory. Apostles continually reminded the church that it existed for more than its own comfort. Families naturally care for one another, but healthy families also grow. Bodies naturally care for their own health, but healthy bodies also function. Armies naturally care for their soldiers, but healthy armies also advance their mission. Apostles helped keep the church focused outward, reminding believers that the Kingdom of God was continually advancing and that the gospel was meant to spread into new territory.

What is especially interesting is that the apostles do not appear to have been establishing independent organizations wherever they traveled. The New Testament repeatedly speaks of the church in a city. Paul writes to the church in Corinth, the church in Ephesus, and the church in Philippi. At the same time, believers gathered in various homes throughout those cities. Multiple gatherings existed, yet they were viewed collectively as one church. The emphasis falls not upon separate organizations but upon one family, one body, and one people expressed through many gatherings.

As apostles established believers, they also raised up local leadership. Acts records that Paul and Barnabas appointed elders among the believers they had established. Later Paul instructed Titus to appoint elders in every city. The pattern is remarkably consistent. Apostles laid foundations and strengthened believers. Elders provided ongoing shepherding and care.

This brings us to one of the most misunderstood aspects of leadership in the church. If apostles were pioneers and foundation-layers, elders were shepherds. The dominant image Scripture uses for elders is not executive, administrator, manager, or chief executive officer. The dominant image is shepherd. A shepherd knows the sheep. A shepherd cares for the sheep. A shepherd protects the sheep. A shepherd helps the sheep mature and remain healthy. Everything about the image is relational because everything about God's design for His church is relational.

This relational emphasis explains why the qualifications for elders focus so heavily upon character. When we read the qualifications in First Timothy and Titus, we discover that Scripture says remarkably little about organizational skill and remarkably much about personal maturity. An elder must be above reproach. He must demonstrate self-control. He must be hospitable. He must lead his family well. He must possess a good reputation. The reason is simple. One of the elder's primary responsibilities is not merely teaching truth but embodying truth.

This is where many modern discussions of leadership fall short. We often assume that teaching occurs primarily through information transfer. A leader speaks, people listen, and discipleship takes place. Yet Scripture presents a much richer picture. Information certainly matters, but information alone rarely produces transformation. God designed discipleship to occur through relationship, observation, imitation, participation, and practice.

Jesus Himself demonstrated this principle. He did not merely deliver sermons and then disappear. He lived among His disciples. For three years they watched Him. They watched Him pray. They watched Him trust His Father. They watched Him love difficult people. They watched Him respond to opposition. They watched Him serve. They watched Him forgive. They watched Him suffer. They watched Him remain faithful. The disciples were not merely learning Jesus' teachings. They were learning Jesus' life.

This helps us understand one of the most profound statements Jesus ever made about discipleship: "A pupil is not above his teacher; but everyone, after he has been fully trained, will be like his teacher." Notice the goal. The goal is not merely learning what the teacher knows. The goal is becoming like the teacher. Kingdom discipleship aims at transformation, not merely information.

Paul embraced this same principle. He repeatedly invited believers to imitate his example. "Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ." At first glance, such a statement can seem startling. Yet Paul understood something that many modern believers have forgotten. God often uses visible examples as one of His primary tools for producing maturity. Paul was not drawing attention to himself. He was pointing to the life of Christ that had become visible through him. His life provided believers with a practical picture of what following Jesus looked like in everyday reality.

This is why the New Testament repeatedly emphasizes example as a central aspect of leadership. Peter instructs elders not to lord authority over others but to prove themselves examples to the flock. The writer of Hebrews encourages believers to observe the outcome of their leaders' lives and imitate their faith. Scripture consistently presents mature believers as living demonstrations of Kingdom Life.

People can argue with sermons. They can debate theology. They can forget information that was taught from a pulpit. Yet it is difficult to dismiss years of visible faithfulness. A mature believer who consistently demonstrates humility, love, patience, generosity, faithfulness, and trust in God becomes a living testimony to the reality of Christ's work. His life validates his words. In many ways, the elder's greatest contribution is not simply the information he communicates but the life he demonstrates. His marriage becomes a lesson in faithfulness. His family becomes a lesson in discipleship. His humility becomes a lesson in Christlikeness. His generosity becomes a lesson in trusting God. His perseverance becomes a lesson in enduring faith. Long before he opens his mouth to teach, his life is already teaching.

Perhaps this is one reason house gatherings fit so naturally within the New Testament vision. Shared life creates opportunities for observation. Believers see one another in ordinary circumstances. They witness how mature disciples handle conflict, suffering, parenting, marriage, finances, hospitality, and ministry. Discipleship moves beyond information transfer and becomes life transfer. Truth is no longer merely taught. It is seen. It is observed. It is imitated. It is practiced. The church becomes a family in which spiritual maturity can be witnessed up close rather than admired from a distance.

This understanding also helps explain why New Testament leadership was generally plural rather than singular. The church is strengthened when multiple mature believers provide examples worth following. Shared leadership provides accountability, balance, wisdom, and protection against unhealthy dependence upon a single personality. Most importantly, it helps preserve the reality that Christ alone remains the Head of His church. The more leadership functions as a team of mature servants, the easier it becomes for attention to remain fixed upon Christ rather than any individual leader.

The discussion naturally raises questions about finances. How should leaders be supported? Once again, Scripture provides principles rather than elaborate systems. Paul writes, "So also the Lord directed those who proclaim the gospel to get their living from the gospel." Those who devote themselves to gospel ministry possess a legitimate right to receive material support. Yet Paul immediately demonstrates that possessing a right and exercising a right are not always the same thing. Throughout much of his ministry he supported himself through tentmaking, choosing at times not to receive support in order to remove obstacles to the gospel.

The same principle appears in relation to elders. Paul writes that elders who labor faithfully, especially those devoted to preaching and teaching, are worthy of double honor. He then adds, "The laborer is worthy of his wages." Scripture clearly allows believers to support those who devote substantial time and energy to gospel ministry and shepherding. Yet Scripture never presents financial support as the defining feature of leadership. Nor does it establish a universal compensation system for every elder.

What Scripture consistently emphasizes is motive. Peter warns elders not to shepherd for sordid gain. Paul repeatedly warns against greed. Ministry is not a means of financial advancement. Leadership is not a career path designed for personal enrichment. Resources are tools intended to support people and advance God's purposes. This perspective aligns perfectly with the broader pattern we see throughout the New Testament. Resources supported gospel workers. Resources cared for widows. Resources relieved suffering. Resources met practical needs. Resources advanced the spread of the gospel. The financial system existed to serve people and mission. People and mission did not exist to serve the financial system.

As we step back and view the entire picture, we begin to see how beautifully these pieces fit together. Apostles serve the life of the family by helping it grow. They serve the life of the body by helping it expand into new territory. They serve the mission of the army by keeping it advancing. Elders serve the life of the family by providing care and maturity. They serve the life of the body by helping every member function properly. They serve the mission of the army by preparing believers to stand firm and remain faithful. Resources serve all of these purposes by strengthening people and supporting the mission. None of these things were ever intended to become the source. They were designed to serve the Source.

This brings us back to the central theme of this book. The issue has never been buildings versus homes. The issue has never been large gatherings versus small gatherings. The issue has never been whether leadership exists or whether finances are necessary. The issue is, and always has been, source. The same spiritual battle that began in the Garden continues today. The enemy still seeks to convince people to look somewhere other than God for life. Sometimes the substitute is obvious. Sometimes it is remarkably religious. Yet the result is always the same. Whenever leadership becomes the source, the church begins drifting outside-in. Whenever institutions become the source, the church begins drifting outside-in. Whenever finances become the source, the church begins drifting outside-in. Whenever programs become the source, the church begins drifting outside-in.

Yet when Christ remains the Head and the sole source of life, everything finds its proper place. Leadership becomes service rather than control. Finances become tools rather than masters. Gatherings become places of participation rather than performance. Mature believers become examples rather than celebrities. Apostles strengthen the expansion of the Kingdom. Elders strengthen the health of the Body. Resources strengthen people and mission. Jesus remains at the center, and His life flows freely through His people.

Imagine a city filled with gatherings of believers meeting in homes and sharing life together. Imagine mature elders quietly serving as examples worth following. Imagine younger believers learning not merely what Jesus taught but what it looks like to follow Him in everyday life. Imagine apostolic workers strengthening the church and helping the gospel spread into new neighborhoods, cities, and nations. Imagine resources flowing naturally toward people in need and toward opportunities for the Kingdom to advance. Imagine every member participating rather than spectating. Imagine children growing up surrounded by living examples of faith. Imagine believers encouraging one another, teaching one another, praying together, eating together, serving together, and growing together under the leadership of Jesus Christ.

That vision is not primarily about structure. It is about life. It is the life of Christ flowing through His family, functioning through His body, and advancing through His army. It is leadership in its proper place. It is discipleship as Jesus intended. It is the church becoming once again what God designed it to be from the beginning—a living family under the lordship of Jesus Christ, growing together into His likeness and expressing His life to the world from the inside out.

05/27/2026

If God Doesn't Change His Mind, Then Why Does He Change His Mind?

One of the most common objections raised against the Bible goes something like this: "The Bible says God doesn't change His mind, but then it repeatedly shows Him changing His mind. Which is it?" It is a fair question, and if we are honest, it can feel like a contradiction at first glance. On one page we read, "God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind" (Numbers 23:19). Yet on another page we find God relenting from destroying Nineveh. We see Him extending Hezekiah's life after announcing his death. We watch Abraham intercede for S***m and Moses plead for Israel after the golden calf. If God doesn't change His mind, then why does He seem to change His mind?

The answer is surprisingly beautiful because working through this apparent paradox leads us beyond a philosophical problem and into a deeper understanding of who God really is. It reveals not merely a God who is powerful or sovereign, but a God who is relationally perfect.

Part of the problem may be that many of us unconsciously define perfection in a way that Scripture never does. We often imagine perfection as immovability. A perfect God, we assume, would never respond, never engage, never adjust, never interact. He would simply execute an eternal blueprint while everything else moves around Him. In this view, relationship becomes little more than an illusion. Prayer changes nothing. Repentance changes nothing. Intercession changes nothing. Human interaction with God becomes a predetermined script in which the outcome is fixed regardless of what anyone says or does. Yet that is not the picture we encounter when we open the pages of Scripture.

The God revealed throughout the biblical story is certainly unwavering in His character, but He is also astonishingly relational. He listens. He speaks. He invites. He warns. He comforts. He disciplines. He grieves. He rejoices. He enters into genuine relationship with the people He created. The question, therefore, is not whether God changes. The question is what kind of change Scripture is actually talking about.

When we look carefully at Numbers 23, we discover that the passage is not addressing whether God responds to prayer, listens to repentance, or engages relationally with people. The context is entirely different. Balak, the king of Moab, wants Balaam to curse Israel. Money is offered. Pressure is applied. Manipulation is attempted. Balak believes God can somehow be persuaded to reverse His blessing and change sides. God's response is straightforward: "I am not like that." He is not a man who says one thing and then changes because someone applies enough pressure. He is not corruptible. He is not deceptive. He does not bless today and curse tomorrow because someone offers a better deal. The point of the passage is not that God never responds relationally. The point is that God never compromises His character. He never ceases to be who He is.

This distinction between character and relationship unlocks the entire issue. God's character never changes. His holiness never changes. His love never changes. His justice never changes. His mercy never changes. His faithfulness never changes. Yet because these things never change, God responds consistently to different relational conditions. The sun provides a helpful illustration. The same sunlight that melts wax hardens clay. The sun has not changed. What changes is the condition of what is exposed to it. In a similar way, God's character remains constant while people move toward Him or away from Him. They repent or rebel. They trust or harden themselves. They surrender or resist. God's responses flow from His unchanging nature, but the relational circumstances are constantly changing. The change is not in God's character. The change is in the relationship.

This becomes especially clear in the story of Jonah. Jonah announces, "Yet forty days and Nineveh will be overthrown." The city repents. The king humbles himself. The people turn from their evil ways. God relents from the announced judgment. Many readers immediately conclude that God changed His mind, but Jonah himself reveals what is really happening. He becomes angry because he knew this was likely to happen. Why? Because he knew God's character. Jonah tells God, "I knew that You are a gracious and compassionate God, slow to anger and abundant in lovingkindness." In other words, Jonah understood that the warning was never merely about destruction. The warning was about repentance. God's goal was not to destroy Nineveh. His goal was to rescue Nineveh. The announced judgment was the means by which He intended to bring the city to repentance. Nothing in the story suggests that God was surprised or that He learned something new. Instead, the story reveals a God whose mercy is greater than people expected.

The story of Hezekiah points in the same direction. Through Isaiah, God tells the king, "Set your house in order, for you shall die." Hezekiah immediately turns his face to the wall and prays. God then grants him fifteen additional years of life. Did God make a mistake the first time? Did He discover information He previously lacked? The text gives no indication of either. Instead, it presents prayer as something meaningful and significant. God draws Hezekiah into dependence, humility, and communion. The prayer matters because the relationship matters, and the relationship matters because God is relational.

The account of Abraham interceding for S***m may be even more revealing. God announces judgment, and Abraham begins asking questions. What if fifty righteous people are found in the city? What about forty-five? What about forty? The conversation continues until Abraham reaches ten. What is remarkable is not simply that Abraham asks these questions. What is remarkable is that God welcomes the discussion. He participates in the conversation. He allows Abraham to wrestle with justice, mercy, righteousness, and judgment. The story reveals that God is not merely interested in accomplishing outcomes. He is interested in forming people. The conversation itself becomes part of God's purpose. Abraham is learning God's heart, and God delights in the relationship.

This is where the entire discussion becomes transformative. Many people imagine perfection as the absence of relationship, but Scripture presents perfection as the fullness of relationship. A perfect father does not become more perfect by ignoring his children. A perfect husband does not become more trustworthy by refusing conversation with his wife. A perfect friend does not become more reliable by remaining distant and inaccessible. The opposite is true. The most trustworthy relationships are often the most engaged and responsive. Relationship is not a weakness. Relationship is a strength. If God were incapable of responding, incapable of listening, incapable of engaging, or incapable of genuine interaction, He would not be more perfect. He would be less relational. Yet the God revealed in Scripture is not merely morally perfect. He is relationally perfect.

At this point it is worth pausing to consider something that many theologians, including Greg Boyd, have emphasized. Too often we approach these passages asking, "How do I protect my philosophical model of God?" when Scripture seems to be asking a different question altogether: "What kind of God is being revealed here?" When we read these stories, we repeatedly encounter a God who invites dialogue, welcomes prayer, responds to repentance, and enters into authentic relationship with human beings. Whether one agrees with every conclusion Boyd reaches or not, his emphasis on taking the relational language of Scripture seriously can be tremendously helpful. These stories are not presented as divine theater. They are presented as real encounters between a loving God and the people He desires to know Him.

The inside-out lens helps us see something even deeper. In nearly every story where God appears to change His mind, His ultimate goal is not the external outcome. His goal is the heart. Nineveh's destruction was not the point; repentance was. Hezekiah's death announcement was not the point; dependence was. Abraham's negotiation was not the point; transformation was. Even Moses' intercession after the golden calf was not merely about avoiding judgment. Through that encounter Moses' heart was being shaped into deeper alignment with God's own heart for His people. Again and again, God works beneath the surface. He is pursuing the inner person. He is not merely managing events. He is restoring relationship. The external circumstances become the stage upon which a deeper work is taking place. The real story is not about altered outcomes. The real story is about changed hearts.

There is another layer to these stories that is easy to miss. From Genesis onward, Scripture presents humanity's fundamental problem as a relational rupture. The serpent's temptation in the garden was not merely about eating fruit. It was an invitation to stop trusting God as the source of life and to seek life apart from Him. Ever since then, humanity has been attempting to find security, identity, wisdom, fulfillment, and control apart from the One who created us. God's work throughout history has been aimed at restoring that broken relationship. When He warns, He is calling people back. When He disciplines, He is calling people back. When He relents, He is calling people back. When He responds to prayer, He is drawing people deeper into dependence and trust. Everything is moving toward restored relationship.

At this point some readers may wonder about God's foreknowledge. Does God eternally know every detail of every future event? Or do some passages reveal a genuine openness within God's relational dealings with humanity? Thoughtful believers have debated these questions for centuries. What is interesting, however, is that Scripture often seems less concerned with answering philosophical questions than with revealing God's character. Whether one emphasizes exhaustive foreknowledge or genuine relational openness, the central truth remains unchanged. The God revealed in Scripture is not distant, cold, detached, or uninterested. He is not conducting fake conversations to create the illusion of relationship. He genuinely desires relationship with the people He has created.

This is why the apparent paradox is not really a paradox at all. If by "changing His mind" we mean that God becomes someone different, then no, God does not change His mind. If we mean that He abandons His character, compromises His integrity, or becomes unreliable, then no, God does not change His mind. But if by "changing His mind" we mean that the unchanging God genuinely responds to changing human conditions, then the answer is yes. Repentance matters. Prayer matters. Intercession matters. Relationship matters. Numbers 23 is not describing a frozen deity who never responds. It is describing a faithful God who never ceases being Himself.

And perhaps this is where the paradox finally gives way to wonder. The God of Scripture is not less personal than we imagined. He is more personal. He is not less relational than we hoped. He is more relational. The God who walked with Adam in the garden, spoke with Abraham under the stars, listened to Moses on the mountain, answered Hezekiah's tears, spared Nineveh when it repented, and ultimately came to us in Jesus is not a God reluctantly tolerating relationship. Relationship is at the very center of who He is.

The greatest irony is that the passages people often use to argue for a distant and impassive God actually reveal the exact opposite. They reveal a God whose love is so steadfast that He never changes in character, and whose love is so perfect that He continually engages with those He loves. He is faithful enough to be trusted and relational enough to be known. He is unwavering enough to be our foundation and personal enough to be our Father. Far from creating a contradiction, these passages reveal one of the most beautiful truths in all of Scripture: the God who never changes is precisely the God who can always be trusted to respond according to His perfect love, perfect wisdom, and perfect relational faithfulness. That is not a paradox. That is good news.

The final question, then, is not whether God changes His mind, but how we should respond to a God who has been so relentlessly faithful to us. What do we do with a God who remained faithful when we were unfaithful? A God who continued pursuing us when we ran from Him? A God who never stopped calling us back, even when we repeatedly sought life, identity, security, and fulfillment apart from Him? The story of Scripture is not primarily the story of humanity searching for God, but of God searching for humanity. From the garden onward, He has been pursuing the very people who betrayed Him. He has been calling prodigals home. He has been seeking the lost, rescuing the captive, and restoring the broken. His unchanging character is seen most clearly at the cross, where He demonstrated His love for us while we were still sinners in open rebellion against Him. Rather than abandoning us to the consequences of our rebellion, He entered our world, confronted the powers of sin and death that held us captive, and through the death and resurrection of Jesus defeated the enemy who enslaved us. He did all of this so that the relationship we walked away from could be restored. The only fitting response to such a God is not mere agreement with theological facts, but repentance, a turning away from every false source of life, and faith, a wholehearted turning toward God in humility and childlike surrender, placing ourselves into the hands of the One who has proven Himself trustworthy. The God who never changes has never stopped inviting us home. The question is whether we will finally stop running and trust the One who has loved us all along.

Address

Atlanta, GA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Gwinnett Fellowship posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Place Of Worship

Send a message to Gwinnett Fellowship:

Share

Category