24/05/2026
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ "๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐" ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐?
(By The Catholic Faith Guardian)
Many Protestants celebrate Pentecost every year. They preach about Acts 2, the coming of the Holy Spirit, and the birth of the Church. Yet many do not realize an uncomfortable historical and biblical fact:
The term โPentecostโ itself comes from the Greek Old Testament tradition embraced by the early Church โ the same tradition that included the seven Deuterocanonical books later rejected by Protestantism.
In fact, the word โPentecostโ appears in the Greek Scriptures (Septuagint) and in the biblical tradition preserved by Catholics, not in the shortened canon adopted centuries later by Reformers.
One example is:
2 Maccabees 12:32
โAfter the feast called Pentecost, they hastened against Gorgias the governor of Idumea.โ
This verse is from the book of 2 Maccabees โ one of the seven books Protestants removed from their Old Testament.
Think about the irony.
Many Protestants passionately celebrate Pentecost while rejecting the very biblical books that explicitly preserve the terminology and historical Jewish usage connected to it.
The word โPentecostโ comes from the Greek word Pentฤkostฤ, meaning โfiftieth,โ referring to the feast celebrated fifty days after Passover. The apostles themselves used this Greek terminology because the early Christians primarily used the Septuagint โ the ancient Greek version of the Old Testament.
And what books did the Septuagint contain?
It contained the Deuterocanonical books:
1. Tobit
2. Judith
3. Wisdom
4. Sirach
5. Baruch
6. 1 Maccabees
7. 2 Maccabees
along with portions of Daniel and Esther.
These books were not โCatholic additions.โ They were part of the Bible used by the early Christians for over 1,500 years.
๐The early Church accepted them.
๐The apostles inherited the Septuagint tradition.
๐The Church Fathers quoted them.
๐Ancient Christian Bibles contained them.
๐Councils of the early Church recognized them.
Yet many Protestants today reject them because of decisions made during and after the Reformation.
Historically, the removal came much later.
The Deuterocanonical books were recognized in early Church councils such as Rome (382 AD), Hippo (393 AD), and Carthage (397 AD). These councils listed the same Old Testament canon preserved today in the Catholic Church.
Even Martin Luther did not completely remove the books at first. He placed them in a separate section. Early Protestant Bibles still printed them.
The widespread removal from Protestant Bibles only became common in the 19th century, especially after the British and Foreign Bible Society stopped funding their printing in 1826.
So the historical question must be asked:
โWho truly preserved the Bible of the early Christians?
The Catholic Church preserved the canon continuously from antiquity.
The Protestant canon represents a later reduction.
And Pentecost itself points toward that ancient biblical tradition.
The apostles did not preach from a stripped canon.
They preached from the Scriptures received through the Septuagint tradition โ the same scriptural world that included Wisdom, Sirach, and Maccabees.
The same Church that preserved the Gospel of Matthew also preserved the Deuterocanonical books.
The same Church that defended the Trinity and the divinity of Christ also read these books in liturgy and doctrine.
To accept the New Testament canon handed down by the early Church while rejecting part of the Old Testament canon preserved by that same Church is historically inconsistent.
Pentecost is therefore more than a feast.
It is evidence of continuity.
Continuity between Israel and the Church.
Continuity between the Septuagint and apostolic Christianity.
Continuity between the early Church and the Catholic canon.
The seven Deuterocanonical books were not inventions.
They were inspired Scriptures preserved by the historic Church and only rejected many centuries later.
The historical evidence is undeniable:
The fuller canon is the ancient canon.