20/09/2026
Aaah, Brother Maliq.........Lies!
Muslims, you claim the Qur’an is the perfect, complete, clear, and preserved word of god.
Yet the same Qur’an is functionally useless on its own.
Without hadiths written by humans, Muslims would not know:
1▪︎ How to pray
2▪︎ How many rak‘ahs to pray
3▪︎ When to pray
4▪︎ What invalidates prayer
5▪︎ How to fast properly
6▪︎ How Hajj is performed
7▪︎ How punishments are applied
8▪︎ How vague verses are interpreted.
Can you show me in the Qur’an where it teaches how to pray step by step? You can’t. Because it isn’t there.
So the so-called “perfect word of god” had to be explained, expanded, interpreted, and legislated through human reports written generations later.
The same thing Muslims mock Christianity for.
It gets worse.
Muslims themselves admit that:
The Qur’an was compiled after Muhammad’s death
Verses were memorised orally (human memory, as if that never fails)
Textual variants existed.
Companions disagreed.
Even one caliph had to burn competing manuscripts
The standard was later enforced by state power.
So please, spare me the selective outrage.
If human involvement automatically equals “corruption”, Islam is not exempt.
If human compilation is a problem, the Qur’an has that problem.
If post-prophet interpretation is illegitimate, Islam collapses instantly.
You cannot claim
“God’s word cannot be corrupted” and accuse other people’s scripture of being corrupted because humans handled it, while your own relies entirely on human transmitters, human editors, human jurists, and human tradition just to make the book usable.
So before lecturing others about corruption, clarity, or preservation, preserve your own text first.
Musa BM Azzaman
0701 511 9394
